kenwong

Member
Messages
46
Reaction score
32
Location
Cambridge, UK
This thread is to share the current options I've considered as potential upgrades from my E-M10, based on the picture I have of my shooting needs. I have not decided whether I want to upgrade my camera body at all, I've just done this assessment based on my current knowledge and reading of what's available, to see if the idea of a body upgrade would make sense.

I'm hoping that sharing this would be of help to someone, and stimulating discussion wouldn't be bad, either, considering what came up in the last thread I started :-)

For my hobby-shooting, I mainly like doing street photography. When on holiday, my love for photography (and practice) comes in for holiday/street/culture/landscape image making. Video is very much a secondary feature for me.

In terms of glass, I mostly use primes in my street shooting (and also travel): 12/2, 14/2.5, 20/1.7, 45/1.8. I recently picked up a 14-140 II for travelling, thanks to much help from this forum.

What I would like as an upgrade for the E-M10:
  • Better image quality/resolution
  • Improved IBIS over E-M10 3-axis IBIS (2-3 stops)
  • Improved EVF over E-M10
  • Better and less fiddly on/off switch positioning
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Bluetooth pairing with phone for real-time geotagging
Without regressing on these features:
  • Smaller/lighter than a DSLR
  • High ISO performance (I'm happy with E-M10 up to 3200)
  • No shutter shock
  • Reasonably good wireless remote function through phone
How some current models have stacked up:

EM1.1
For
:
  • Improved IBIS (4.5 stops)
  • Improved EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Affordable for a top-end body (can get 12-40 kit around £1000)
Against:
  • Older model than E-M10
  • Same sensor as E-M10
  • Not sure about having that on/off switch on the other side
  • No Bluetooth
EM5.2
For
:
  • Improved IBIS (5 stops)
  • Improved EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Almost as small/light as E-M10
  • High Res mode sounds useful for tripod based landscape shooting
Against:
  • Grip is thin, buying modular grips costs more
  • Expensive (£700) compared to direct rival Panasonic G80 (£600)
  • Same sensor as E-M10 (as far as I can tell)
  • No Bluetooth
  • On/Off switch position
G80
For
:
  • OLED EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Auto panorama
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Can have dual IS with my 14-140 II
  • More affordable of the mid-range m43 bodies
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
Against:
  • Reviews mixed on whether sensor is better than E-M10's sensor (DxOMark says E-M10 has better high ISO performance)
  • Feedback I've read on Panasonic's iOS app is not encouraging
  • Can't find much info on how good IBIS is on its own
  • No Bluetooth
EM1.2 -not tried in hand
For:
  • Improved EVF, but still LCD
  • Improved IBIS (5 stops)
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • 20MP sensor
Against:
  • Expensive
  • On/Off switch position
  • No Bluetooth
G9 -not tried in hand
For:
  • OLED EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Improved IBIS (4-5 stops from what I've read)
  • Can have dual IS with the 14-140 II
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Nice on/off switch position
  • 20MP sensor
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
  • Bluetooth connection
Against:
  • Expensive
  • As bulky/heavy as a DSLR body (bigger than Pentax K-30, last DSLR I owned)
 
I just went through the "upgrade from E-M10" process and ended up going with the G9. Since I had originally been set on the E-M1 mark II as my next camera, cost was less of a factor in my thinking process than yours appears to be -- I was already prepared for the big pricetag. It certainly ticks all of your hoped for improvements and avoids some of your regression points. If you were happy with the E-M10 through ISO 3200 you should be happy with the G9 through at least ISO 6400. I never went over ISO 1600 on the M10 and have bumped that to 3200 on the G9. The difference is that my lens stable is nowadays mostly zooms (either fast/heavy or big), so the larger size of the camera is actually a plus from a handling standpoint. I needed the grip with the M10 to feel comfortable with my lenses but the better grip and larger body size of the G9 makes a grip unnecessary from an ergonomic standpoint.
 
This thread is to share the current options I've considered as potential upgrades from my E-M10, based on the picture I have of my shooting needs. I have not decided whether I want to upgrade my camera body at all, I've just done this assessment based on my current knowledge and reading of what's available, to see if the idea of a body upgrade would make sense.

I'm hoping that sharing this would be of help to someone, and stimulating discussion wouldn't be bad, either, considering what came up in the last thread I started :-)

For my hobby-shooting, I mainly like doing street photography. When on holiday, my love for photography (and practice) comes in for holiday/street/culture/landscape image making. Video is very much a secondary feature for me.

In terms of glass, I mostly use primes in my street shooting (and also travel): 12/2, 14/2.5, 20/1.7, 45/1.8. I recently picked up a 14-140 II for travelling, thanks to much help from this forum.

What I would like as an upgrade for the E-M10:
  • Better image quality/resolution
  • Improved IBIS over E-M10 3-axis IBIS (2-3 stops)
  • Improved EVF over E-M10
  • Better and less fiddly on/off switch positioning
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Bluetooth pairing with phone for real-time geotagging
Without regressing on these features:
  • Smaller/lighter than a DSLR
  • High ISO performance (I'm happy with E-M10 up to 3200)
  • No shutter shock
  • Reasonably good wireless remote function through phone
How some current models have stacked up:

EM1.1
For
:
  • Improved IBIS (4.5 stops)
  • Improved EVF
Yes, much larger and with higher resolution. The S-OVF function added in a firmware update is occasionally useful, too.
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Affordable for a top-end body (can get 12-40 kit around £1000)
Against:
  • Older model than E-M10
  • Same sensor as E-M10
It's actually NOT the same sensor as the E-M10, but a Panasonic-produced one (for this model only). It's something I don't like quite as much in the E-M1, actually - it seems a tad noisier to me, and it handles the (very useful and additional over your E-M10 original) silent shutter mode less well than the Sony-sensor models - a slow speed limit of 1/8 sec for silent shutter, an ISO 3200 ceiling for it, and a horrible magenta shift at the top of the frame if used at ISO 3200 in low light.
  • Not sure about having that on/off switch on the other side
I like that position personally, but appreciate that not everyone else does.

The E-M1 comes with the FL-LM2 camera-powered flash, a black unit which folds flat to turn off; you raise it to turn it on. Aside from its separateness (not really a word, I know!) it is pretty much like a built-in flash. It's weatherproof and uses the Accessory Port to make its connections, whilst mounting in the hot shoe for purely physical location.
  • No Bluetooth
EM5.2
For
:
  • Improved IBIS (5 stops)
  • Improved EVF
Same model/design as the E-M1 EVF, but strangely it is subtly clearer.
  • Weather proofing
  • Almost as small/light as E-M10
It is close in size, but somewhat heavier. I have a very soft spot for this model - I think it is beautifully designed (a purely subjective opinion of course) and has a really nice, quality feel to it.
  • High Res mode sounds useful for tripod based landscape shooting
I find it particularly useful for incredibly detailed close up or product shots - haven't tried it for landscape.

The E-M5 II comes with the lovely little FL-LM3 camera-powered flash in the box - weatherproof, but unlike the earlier FL-LM2 of the E-M1, it is conventionally-shaped (but tiny) and with a power switch - but best of all, with full tilt and swivel. It is a lovely little thing. It uses an additional contact in the hot shoe to power it - only some Olympus bodies (and Panasonics, which require the FL-LM3's foot to be filed a bit to fit their unusually short hot shoe) can use it.
Against:
  • Grip is thin, buying modular grips costs more
  • Expensive (£700) compared to direct rival Panasonic G80 (£600)
  • Same sensor as E-M10 (as far as I can tell)
This one does use a Sony sensor, so the limitations on silent shooting that the E-M1 has are absent with it. I find the jpg output (and even the image fed to the EVF) seem to be subtly improved compared with earlier models, having a satisfying clarity to them.
  • No Bluetooth
  • On/Off switch position
Again, I don't mind this at all, but maybe you would.
G80
For
:
  • OLED EVF
It is a very good EVF - no distortion or anything, which is sadly not always the case with Panasonics I've used. This is down to a good design for the EVF optics, which Olympus always seem to use, thankfully.
  • Weather proofing
  • Auto panorama
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Can have dual IS with my 14-140 II
  • More affordable of the mid-range m43 bodies
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
Though it does have EFCS mode available optionally too (a first for Panasonic). The sound level of the shutter is very similar to the E-M5 II, which was the first Olympus to use TRUE EFCS rather than the simulated variety of the earlier models with 0-sec Anti Shock feature (i.e. the first curtain doesn't physically run at all in 0-sec AS on the E-M5 II, though the Olympus still doesn't use it above 1/320; the G80 uses it up to 1/2000 and that's the top speed in EFCS mode, rather than the usual mechanical 1/4000).

You might count the built-in flash of the G80 as a plus - it's always nice to have. However, it cannot use a camera-powered flash, unlike some Panasonics. This rules out obtaining a £69 Olympus FL-LM3 and filing the foot to use it with the Panny.
Against:
  • Reviews mixed on whether sensor is better than E-M10's sensor (DxOMark says E-M10 has better high ISO performance)
  • Feedback I've read on Panasonic's iOS app is not encouraging
  • Can't find much info on how good IBIS is on its own
For me, the E-M5 II handles my particular "shake" frequencies a little better than the G80 - I can hand hold to lower speeds. However, individual examples of any camera can actually vary (I once tested that out, side by side).

The G80's typical (till now and the G9) G-series power switch position (like on Canon's EOS lower end DSLRs, sprouting from the base of the mode dial) is arguably OK or awkward, depending on your taste.
  • No Bluetooth
EM1.2 -not tried in hand
For:
  • Improved EVF, but still LCD
It's really pretty much the same unit as the original E-M1 and the E-M5 II, so the same size and resolution (which are pretty much the same as in the G80, but less contrasty).
  • Improved IBIS (5 stops)
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • 20MP sensor
It's not often noted, but the G80 and E-M1 Mark II are actually pretty much an identical size, though the Olympus is a bit heavier (more metal in the construction). They are also surprisingly close in outline (size of grip etc.).
Against:
  • Expensive
At least it's come down in price just lately to £1499 or less, to compete directly with the G9!
  • On/Off switch position
Again, the same as the other recent Olympuses, so either awkward for some or fine for others (like me).
  • No Bluetooth
G9 -not tried in hand
For:
  • OLED EVF
It's big and very high res (and adjustable to two smaller sizes) but I do find that the corners can smear and distort (I wear glasses, which may play a part, but some of it is the design) - and there is the slight pincushion distortion many have mentioned. Individual cameras may even vary, at least with respect to the corner smearing. I have learned to ignore it, most of the time, but the eyepiece quality is annoyingly not quite as good as the G80, whilst the EVF panel itself is even better. Strange...
  • Weather proofing
  • Improved IBIS (4-5 stops from what I've read)
It is the best Panasonic IBIS I've used, and is quieter than the G80 (similarly, the E-M1 II is quieter than earlier Olympuses too - for comparison, the G80 sounds like an earlier Olympus when the latter has ramped up on half-press of the shutter button, if the camera is so set, but all the time).
  • Can have dual IS with the 14-140 II
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Nice on/off switch position
Yes, probably the most natural position of all. Annoyingly, I find I prefer the around-the-shutter-button front dial design of the Olympuses and the G80 to the Canon-style vertical front dial of the G9, but you cannot have their dial design with its power switch, since they occupy the same position!
  • 20MP sensor
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
As with the G80, it does have an EFCS setting too (top speed on that is 1/2000 again) so they must think it has a purpose. The shutter's a bit sharper/louder than the G80, but not much.
  • Bluetooth connection
Against:
  • Expensive
Yes, as with the E-M1 II.
  • As bulky/heavy as a DSLR body (bigger than Pentax K-30, last DSLR I owned)
Yes, it is bigger than all the others. Nice grip and grippy cover material, you can sort of forget the size/weight when holding it.

Note that no flash is supplied with this model, and it cannot use an FL-LM3, so you may need to budget for a decent flash if you don't have one - or any dedicated flash, if you have only relied on built-in before (and only needed a flash to that level).

Hope those thoughts help - they're really subjective of course so they may not apply to you.
 
... Pen F a consideration?
 
For E-M1ii you can swap the on/off switch with the function lever surrounding the AFL/AEL button. This way you should be able to operate it with one hand, and make other people think your battery is dead or something.
 
For E-M1ii you can swap the on/off switch with the function lever surrounding the AFL/AEL button.
Unfortunately, for some bizarre reason that lever is reversed in a way that makes it hard and uncomfortable to switch (unless you have a long thumb I guess).
 
This thread is to share the current options I've considered as potential upgrades from my E-M10, based on the picture I have of my shooting needs. I have not decided whether I want to upgrade my camera body at all,
In that case, wait it out until E-M5 Mark II comes out later this year. With E-M1 being a serious action shooting flagship, I would expect Olympus will push E-M5 Mark III more towards landscape / studio shooting (and possibly video). It might be just what you are after.
What I would like as an upgrade for the E-M10:
  • Better image quality/resolution
  • Improved IBIS over E-M10 3-axis IBIS (2-3 stops)
  • Improved EVF over E-M10
  • Better and less fiddly on/off switch positioning
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Bluetooth pairing with phone for real-time geotagging
You just basically described GX9 that people here were expecting but didn't get. :-)

If you are willing to give up weather resistance (you don't have WR lenses anyway) and don't mind buying an accessory grip for larger lenses (I think the Panny one is cheap), the GX9 ticks all the other boxes. Not sure about real time geo-tagging, but I'm sure there's something similar at least.
Without regressing on these features:
  • Smaller/lighter than a DSLR
  • High ISO performance (I'm happy with E-M10 up to 3200)
  • No shutter shock
  • Reasonably good wireless remote function through phone
Yep, that's also good with GX9.
How some current models have stacked up:

EM1.1
For
:
  • Improved IBIS (4.5 stops)
  • Improved EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Affordable for a top-end body (can get 12-40 kit around £1000)
Against:
  • Older model than E-M10
This is insignificant.
  • Same sensor as E-M10
It's not the same sensor. E-M1 uses Panasonic sensor. Stay away if you are interested in long exposures, your E-M10 will perform better for that.
  • Not sure about having that on/off switch on the other side
  • No Bluetooth
EM5.2
For
:
  • Improved IBIS (5 stops)
  • Improved EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Almost as small/light as E-M10
  • High Res mode sounds useful for tripod based landscape shooting
Against:
  • Grip is thin, buying modular grips costs more
But I think it's better shaped than the one on E-M10.
  • Expensive (£700) compared to direct rival Panasonic G80 (£600)
Buy during cashback promotions. :-) They happen fairly regularly and can save you 100 pounds or more.
  • Same sensor as E-M10 (as far as I can tell)
  • No Bluetooth
  • On/Off switch position
G80
For
:
  • OLED EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Auto panorama
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Can have dual IS with my 14-140 II
  • More affordable of the mid-range m43 bodies
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
Against:
  • Reviews mixed on whether sensor is better than E-M10's sensor (DxOMark says E-M10 has better high ISO performance)
It's definitely worse in terms of long exposures. The BULB mode is even limited to 2 minutes only. And using dark frame subtraction is a pretty much a must (very annoying when using that often).
  • Feedback I've read on Panasonic's iOS app is not encouraging
Olympus isn't any better.
  • Can't find much info on how good IBIS is on its own
Not as good as Olympus. And it was essentially broken on release and needed a firmware update. Performance before update was very poor (google translate).
  • No Bluetooth
EM1.2 -not tried in hand
For:
  • Improved EVF, but still LCD
  • Improved IBIS (5 stops)
  • Weather proofing
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • 20MP sensor
Against:
  • Expensive
  • On/Off switch position
  • No Bluetooth
And also poor startup time, which might be an issue for street. It's a bit worse compared to E-M10.

And seems like an overkill from what you write about your use cases.
G9 -not tried in hand
For:
  • OLED EVF
  • Weather proofing
  • Improved IBIS (4-5 stops from what I've read)
  • Can have dual IS with the 14-140 II
  • Easier to grip with large(r) lenses
  • Nice on/off switch position
  • 20MP sensor
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
  • Bluetooth connection
Against:
  • Expensive
  • As bulky/heavy as a DSLR body (bigger than Pentax K-30, last DSLR I owned)
Another overkill.

Basically, there is nothing in Micro 4/3 right now that meets your requirements. I am 99% sure that the upcoming E-M5 Mark III will be exactly what you are looking for, however:
  • I would not expect it before Photokina in September
  • It will be rather expensive, most likely around 1100-1200 pounds
At this moment, PEN-F and GX90 seem like pretty good candidates.
 
Thank you very much Helen. It is really helpful to hear from someone who has handled and used so many different camera bodies.

I didn't know about the E-M1.1 sensor being different from the other Olympus models - I guess I assumed that all the 16MP models used the same sensor, perhaps with some tweaks.

Truth be told, I don't know how bothered I'd be with the new OM-D model on/off switch positions. The E-M10 has its on/off switch on the back panel, in the bottom right corner, a small switch that I sometimes find hard to toggle, and that's probably the only aspect of its control layout I don't like.
 
Thank you very much Helen. It is really helpful to hear from someone who has handled and used so many different camera bodies.

I didn't know about the E-M1.1 sensor being different from the other Olympus models - I guess I assumed that all the 16MP models used the same sensor, perhaps with some tweaks.

Truth be told, I don't know how bothered I'd be with the new OM-D model on/off switch positions. The E-M10 has its on/off switch on the back panel, in the bottom right corner, a small switch that I sometimes find hard to toggle, and that's probably the only aspect of its control layout I don't like.
Yes, that position was a bit weird and only found on the original E-M5 and E-M10. I too found it a bit tricky at times. With the style on the E-M1, E-M5 II and E-M1 II, I just use my left thumb and it seems quite easy but a fair few people seem to find it awkward.
 
I think the advice of waiting for the E-M5iii is probably wise. And of current cameras, I'd probably agree with taking a close look at the GX9. None of the cameras meet all of the OPs parameters. One thing I'd say to the OP is to really think about size for the stated purposes. I have an E-M1i and an E-M10ii. The overall ergonomics and handling of the E-M1 are clearly better, especially with larger lenses. And it's the camera I take if I go out to "do photography." But the 10ii goes with me everywhere. We did a trip to Europe last spring and were doing quite a bit of moving around. My E-M1 stayed home. I took the 10ii, a Panasonic 14-140, a 17 f/1.8, a few spare batteries and SD cards, and polarizing filters for both lenses. I really value the smaller size and lighter weight when traveling, or when walking around town, etc. None of the 16mp cameras are going to give you significantly better IQ. I really like the looks of the new GX9 as that kind of light weight companion. My biggest concern is the EVF. The E-M5iii is likely to bring some meaningful upgrades. FWIW, I upgraded from the E-M10i to the 10ii. I had no intention of doing so until I found out that the OLED EVF in the 10ii would work with polarized sunglasses. Since I'm old and can't read anything up close without correction, that was important to me. The EVF in the 10ii is bigger and brighter than in the 10i. It was actually a pretty nice upgrade to the 10i in several ways. If the OP wants a short term inexpensive solution, he might consider finding a gently used 10ii.
 
Thank you for the replies so far. Some of you have suggested looking at the GX90 and/or the PEN-F, while pointing out that I don't actually have any weather-sealed lenses. I see your point: if I think about choosing a body according to my lens collection, it makes sense to consider those models, since, with the exception of the 14-140, all my lenses are small and light.

Which leads to the question of how to think about the options. Does one choose a body based on the existing lens collection, around planned future lens purchases (which may be years in the future), or some combination of both?

My thoughts on the GX9 and PEN-F, based on what I've seen on-paper (well, online):

PEN-F

For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS
  • Improved EVF (OLED is good, so I've read)
  • Small/light
  • High Res mode
  • Majority of reviews I read, particularly in street photographers' blogs, had the photographer falling in love with it.
  • Looking at one makes me want to pick it up and take pictures with it. Appeals to the part of me that wants a Fuji X100T :-P
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Expensive; only E-M1.2 and G9 cost more
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
  • No Bluetooth
GX9
For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS (? - need to wait for reviews) + dual IS support
  • Improved EVF with tilting
  • Small/light
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • Probably going to be cheaper than the PEN-F, at least
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
I think I can definitely wait at least until the GX9 becomes available to buy (which may or may not motivate a price drop on the PEN-F too), or maybe even wait for the E-M5.3 whenever that comes. :-)
 
Thank you for the replies so far. Some of you have suggested looking at the GX90 and/or the PEN-F, while pointing out that I don't actually have any weather-sealed lenses. I see your point: if I think about choosing a body according to my lens collection, it makes sense to consider those models, since, with the exception of the 14-140, all my lenses are small and light.

Which leads to the question of how to think about the options. Does one choose a body based on the existing lens collection, around planned future lens purchases (which may be years in the future), or some combination of both?

My thoughts on the GX9 and PEN-F, based on what I've seen on-paper (well, online):

PEN-F

For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS
  • Improved EVF (OLED is good, so I've read)
  • Small/light
  • High Res mode
  • Majority of reviews I read, particularly in street photographers' blogs, had the photographer falling in love with it.
  • Looking at one makes me want to pick it up and take pictures with it. Appeals to the part of me that wants a Fuji X100T :-P
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Expensive; only E-M1.2 and G9 cost more
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
  • No Bluetooth
GX9
For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS (? - need to wait for reviews) + dual IS support
  • Improved EVF with tilting
  • Small/light
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • Probably going to be cheaper than the PEN-F, at least
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
I think I can definitely wait at least until the GX9 becomes available to buy (which may or may not motivate a price drop on the PEN-F too), or maybe even wait for the E-M5.3 whenever that comes. :-)
All three vv woul be great choices. Well any of the ones mentioned

Regarding the Pen F, is it available as a refurbished itemi In the UK? That would offer considerable savings

Regarding the GX9, if the viewfinder is the Gx85 combative getting the alternative eye cup. I personally didn't for the vf on the GX85
 
Thank you for the replies so far. Some of you have suggested looking at the GX90 and/or the PEN-F, while pointing out that I don't actually have any weather-sealed lenses. I see your point: if I think about choosing a body according to my lens collection, it makes sense to consider those models, since, with the exception of the 14-140, all my lenses are small and light.

Which leads to the question of how to think about the options. Does one choose a body based on the existing lens collection, around planned future lens purchases (which may be years in the future), or some combination of both?

My thoughts on the GX9 and PEN-F, based on what I've seen on-paper (well, online):

PEN-F

For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS
  • Improved EVF (OLED is good, so I've read)
  • Small/light
  • High Res mode
  • Majority of reviews I read, particularly in street photographers' blogs, had the photographer falling in love with it.
  • Looking at one makes me want to pick it up and take pictures with it. Appeals to the part of me that wants a Fuji X100T :-P
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Expensive; only E-M1.2 and G9 cost more
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
  • No Bluetooth
GX9
For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS (? - need to wait for reviews) + dual IS support
  • Improved EVF with tilting
  • Small/light
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • Probably going to be cheaper than the PEN-F, at least
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
I think I can definitely wait at least until the GX9 becomes available to buy (which may or may not motivate a price drop on the PEN-F too), or maybe even wait for the E-M5.3 whenever that comes. :-)
All three vv woul be great choices. Well any of the ones mentioned

Regarding the Pen F, is it available as a refurbished itemi In the UK? That would offer considerable savings

Regarding the GX9, if the viewfinder is the Gx85 combative getting the alternative eye cup. I personally didn't for the vf on the GX85
 
Thank you for the replies so far. Some of you have suggested looking at the GX90 and/or the PEN-F, while pointing out that I don't actually have any weather-sealed lenses. I see your point: if I think about choosing a body according to my lens collection, it makes sense to consider those models, since, with the exception of the 14-140, all my lenses are small and light.

Which leads to the question of how to think about the options. Does one choose a body based on the existing lens collection, around planned future lens purchases (which may be years in the future), or some combination of both?

My thoughts on the GX9 and PEN-F, based on what I've seen on-paper (well, online):

PEN-F

For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS
  • Improved EVF (OLED is good, so I've read)
  • Small/light
  • High Res mode
  • Majority of reviews I read, particularly in street photographers' blogs, had the photographer falling in love with it.
  • Looking at one makes me want to pick it up and take pictures with it. Appeals to the part of me that wants a Fuji X100T :-P
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Expensive; only E-M1.2 and G9 cost more
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
  • No Bluetooth
GX9
For:

  • 20MP sensor
  • Improved IBIS (? - need to wait for reviews) + dual IS support
  • Improved EVF with tilting
  • Small/light
  • New shutter design mitigates/eliminates shutter shock without requiring EFCS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • Probably going to be cheaper than the PEN-F, at least
Against:
  • No WR. But if it's 'no WR' like my E-M10 (which I use in the rain from time to time), maybe not an issue, but I did put WR on my list of wants :-P
  • Potential handling issues with large(r) lenses
I think I can definitely wait at least until the GX9 becomes available to buy (which may or may not motivate a price drop on the PEN-F too), or maybe even wait for the E-M5.3 whenever that comes. :-)
All three vv woul be great choices. Well any of the ones mentioned

Regarding the Pen F, is it available as a refurbished itemi In the UK? That would offer considerable savings

Regarding the GX9, if the viewfinder is the Gx85 combative getting the alternative eye cup. I personally didn't for the vf on the GX85
 
All three vv woul be great choices. Well any of the ones mentioned

Regarding the Pen F, is it available as a refurbished itemi In the UK? That would offer considerable savings

Regarding the GX9, if the viewfinder is the Gx85 combative getting the alternative eye cup. I personally didn't for the vf on the GX85
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top