Glamor Headsots

kilofox

Leading Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
975
Location
Spring Lake, US
Westcott Eyelighter with Rotolight Aeos. A7Riii with 85GM
C&C Welcome

0ca83b004a934c42ab79ebb996d5f00d.jpg



bb174d82052a43c29502bf35df4ea81a.jpg



d29046f7e7d347b9b595ce9fc2f00c47.jpg



db841578fb5e47e285ab17ac818b73f1.jpg



f4da7302e7b440819ef2b806bcb1618c.jpg



fc02b74fcdeb4413951d17a7dba940f6.jpg



3c58851c637346c1b6b176d7e576d5a2.jpg
 
#3 #4 eyes slightly out of focus. Did you use eye focus or manual focus? Very nice headshots. I like all of them.
 
Wow, that lighting is flat....

and a little bit hot too.

Tedolph
 
As noted by others- my main thoughts are, you have quite a lot of shine/hot spots on foreheads/cheeks & noses. I think it's a combination of too shiny makeup & smallish hard front lighting. I'd run some tests & find the best way to combat that. All the best P
 
Last edited:
Ted and Farg... I agree with you both. Too hot and too much shine.

It was a rushed thing..... and it shows.

Thanks for your feedback.
 
I won't repeat the other observations, though I am surprised you say you used EyeAF and didn't quite nail some. It's usually very reliable for me...

The thing that looked odd to me were the little U shaped crescent catch lights - at first I thought it was contact lenses. Just a matter of taste I suppose. :-/

Makeup and softer light would help those hot spots. A bit of retouching wouldn't hurt but that light and reflector combo light be limiting what you can achieve.

--
- Karen
http://www.karenengelphotography.com
Follow us on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/karenengelphotography/
 
Last edited:
I’m going to put aside the lighting issues. For the most part, you got really good poses out of amateurs. The shots are well composed. From that perspective, we’ll done.
 
Westcott Eyelighter with Rotolight Aeos. A7Riii with 85GM
C&C Welcome

0ca83b004a934c42ab79ebb996d5f00d.jpg
How far away were you from the model in this shot?

tedolph
 
With a fixed 85mm it's pretty easy to figure how far away they were, unless they have cropped a great deal.

This FOV calculator works well - https://www.pointsinfocus.com/tools/depth-of-field-and-equivalent-lens-calculator/#{"c":[{"f":13,"av":"8","fl":85,"d":3048,"cm":"0"}],"m":0}

The "Nikon" FF is a Sony FF sensor so the same thing more or less.

10-12 feet is the probable answer at the minimum...
Assuming that the camera was in portrait orientation and the vertical filed was about three feet I get a distance of about seven feet using that website.

A little bit too close.
TEdolph
 
Last edited:
With a fixed 85mm it's pretty easy to figure how far away they were, unless they have cropped a great deal.

This FOV calculator works well - https://www.pointsinfocus.com/tools/depth-of-field-and-equivalent-lens-calculator/#{"c":[{"f":13,"av":"8","fl":85,"d":3048,"cm":"0"}],"m":0}

The "Nikon" FF is a Sony FF sensor so the same thing more or less.

10-12 feet is the probable answer at the minimum...
Assuming that the camera was in portrait orientation and the vertical filed was about three feet I get a distance of about seven feet using that website.

A little bit too close.
 
With a fixed 85mm it's pretty easy to figure how far away they were, unless they have cropped a great deal.

This FOV calculator works well - https://www.pointsinfocus.com/tools/depth-of-field-and-equivalent-lens-calculator/#{"c":[{"f":13,"av":"8","fl":85,"d":3048,"cm":"0"}],"m":0}

The "Nikon" FF is a Sony FF sensor so the same thing more or less.

10-12 feet is the probable answer at the minimum...
Assuming that the camera was in portrait orientation and the vertical filed was about three feet I get a distance of about seven feet using that website.

A little bit too close.
TEdolph
That sounds about right. Maybe 8 feet.
I shot these at a learning workshop. I was trying for a high-keyish glamor headshot. I obviously "cooked" the models somewhat. Things were a little rushed. I'll do better next time.
Well, seven feet is too close For a tight head shot. I am seeing some very unattractive perspective distortion especially in the first shot.

Tedolph
 
Watch your lighting. You have bad hotspots on most of them. Drop the camera, it’s too high for headshots. Claw hands are bad, bad, bad. Every one with hands, it takes away from the shot.

You are about halfway there. I can see potential, you need a lot of technical improvement for these to work. Better models will help too. It looks like they really don’t know how to pose or what looks good for them.
 
With a fixed 85mm it's pretty easy to figure how far away they were, unless they have cropped a great deal.

This FOV calculator works well - https://www.pointsinfocus.com/tools/depth-of-field-and-equivalent-lens-calculator/#{"c":[{"f":13,"av":"8","fl":85,"d":3048,"cm":"0"}],"m":0}

The "Nikon" FF is a Sony FF sensor so the same thing more or less.

10-12 feet is the probable answer at the minimum...
Assuming that the camera was in portrait orientation and the vertical filed was about three feet I get a distance of about seven feet using that website.

A little bit too close.
 
With a fixed 85mm it's pretty easy to figure how far away they were, unless they have cropped a great deal.

This FOV calculator works well - https://www.pointsinfocus.com/tools/depth-of-field-and-equivalent-lens-calculator/#{"c":[{"f":13,"av":"8","fl":85,"d":3048,"cm":"0"}],"m":0}

The "Nikon" FF is a Sony FF sensor so the same thing more or less.

10-12 feet is the probable answer at the minimum...
Assuming that the camera was in portrait orientation and the vertical filed was about three feet I get a distance of about seven feet using that website.

A little bit too close.
 
With a fixed 85mm it's pretty easy to figure how far away they were, unless they have cropped a great deal.

This FOV calculator works well - https://www.pointsinfocus.com/tools/depth-of-field-and-equivalent-lens-calculator/#{"c":[{"f":13,"av":"8","fl":85,"d":3048,"cm":"0"}],"m":0}

The "Nikon" FF is a Sony FF sensor so the same thing more or less.

10-12 feet is the probable answer at the minimum...
Assuming that the camera was in portrait orientation and the vertical filed was about three feet I get a distance of about seven feet using that website.

A little bit too close.
 
These are great portraits. I see good model to photographer interaction. Tiny technicals details will be perfected over time and with your taste and intuituon you will define your own style, but ability working with models allowing them to show emotion is a gift. I believe you have a talant.

As for the lighting, personally I love natural light as I find it most pleasing to look at, therefore I try to imitate it in the studio.
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top