Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Having used the X-T20 for 4 months now, i can tell you it is a very capable camera. So is the X-T2 of course.About to pull the trigger on one of these. Are the only real differences between the two the size and the the weather resistance factor? Same processor, same everything else?
Generally good summary but the X-T2's handling advantage is not simply a matter of fit/feel. No accessories can add an ISO dial or an AF joystick. The extra control points do significantly affect the shooting experience. The AF joystick in particular is very important to me. Which brings me back to my suggestion that the OP handle both and take pictures to decide if the steep premium for pretty much the same performance is worthwhile for their circumstances/preferences.So it all comes down to WR and EVF, and the price you pay for that. Size depends more on the lens than body to be honest,
I would go big. Get a Godox v860ii-f or tt685f. Not only do these flashes have bigger guid numbers, they also have bigger flash heads so that you will have an easier time of mounting light modifiers.I use fill flash LOTS of the time when shooting outdoors.
What flash would you X-T2 fans recommend for someone who will keep it nearly permanently mounted?
Always the best piece of advice....fully agree.Which brings me back to my suggestion that the OP handle both and take pictures to decide if the steep premium for pretty much the same performance is worthwhile for their circumstances/preferences.
To be fair I don't think anyone has said or implied that the video is the same (in fact there's an earlier post pointing out the differences there). For stills they are the same. But if the OP has video as a high priority I doubt the XT20 would be on their list anyway.Everyone keeps saying they have the same processor and same resolution so they produce the same video but it’s not correct. The XT2 oversamples and the XT20 subsamples. Watch the videos to see for yourself
X-T20 has touchscreen if that is important. It also can be purchased with XC kit lenses very inexpensively, $1,100 for body, 2 lenses and a grip. Great value and lightweight setup.
X-T2 is professional grade with XF lens kit options and 2 or 3 times more expensive. Better quality, heavier, faster, aperture rings.
So if you plan on making money with your camera the X-T2 is the way to go. As an amatuer your budget must decide.
The X-T20 won out for me, no regrets. Really wanted lighter weight body and lenses. Will add some primes as needed.
Why? The X-T20 shoots pretty good 4k video albeit at a low recording limit of 10 minutes. Yes it's line skipping and a hair softer then the X-T2 but it's no slouch and uses the full sensor in terms of field of view.To be fair I don't think anyone has said or implied that the video is the same (in fact there's an earlier post pointing out the differences there). For stills they are the same. But if the OP has video as a high priority I doubt the XT20 would be on their list anyway.Everyone keeps saying they have the same processor and same resolution so they produce the same video but it’s not correct. The XT2 oversamples and the XT20 subsamples. Watch the videos to see for yourself