Disappointed in Tamron material quality on G2 lenses....and....

While waiting for 70-200mm to come back I wrapped my 24-70mm G2 in vinyl.



7f317ff30c13484f87d0a5821d86b393.jpg



--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
 
While waiting for 70-200mm to come back I wrapped my 24-70mm G2 in vinyl.

7f317ff30c13484f87d0a5821d86b393.jpg

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Are you happy with the images and focus speed and accuracy?

Thanks

--
Wishing You Good Light.
 
While waiting for 70-200mm to come back I wrapped my 24-70mm G2 in vinyl.

7f317ff30c13484f87d0a5821d86b393.jpg

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Are you happy with the images and focus speed and accuracy?

Thanks

--
Wishing You Good Light.
Yes. But I was almost happy with G1 version too. But G2 is a little more accurate because I adjust it on the Tap-in.

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
 
While waiting for 70-200mm to come back I wrapped my 24-70mm G2 in vinyl.

7f317ff30c13484f87d0a5821d86b393.jpg

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Are you happy with the images and focus speed and accuracy?

Thanks

--
Wishing You Good Light.
Yes. But I was almost happy with G1 version too. But G2 is a little more accurate because I adjust it on the Tap-in.

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Thanks I am reading up on these now as I need to replace my old Tokina 29-70 2.8 AF-D which is having focusing issues.

I am seeing some users say that focus is not great in low light but then I see images from others of stage performances in low light etc.

What are your thoughts on the AF? i.e, Speed, lock on, accuracy and low light.

Thanks!

--
Wishing You Good Light.
 
Last edited:
While waiting for 70-200mm to come back I wrapped my 24-70mm G2 in vinyl.

7f317ff30c13484f87d0a5821d86b393.jpg

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Are you happy with the images and focus speed and accuracy?

Thanks

--
Wishing You Good Light.
Yes. But I was almost happy with G1 version too. But G2 is a little more accurate because I adjust it on the Tap-in.

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Thanks I am reading up on these now as I need to replace my old Tokina 29-70 2.8 AF-D which is having focusing issues.

I am seeing some users say that focus is not great in low light but then I see images from others of stage performances in low light etc.

What are your thoughts on the AF? i.e, Speed, lock on, accuracy and low light.

Thanks!

--
Wishing You Good Light.
There are many different cameras and many different light situations and many different subjects. It is almost impossible to ascertain every single situation. That said I have problems sometime in very drabby light on people faces that are too dark or too light or in back lit situations.

For example this was taken with the flash but if I was not using flash I would have to use ISO 12800 or higher with these parameters. The camera wanted to focus on the background for some reason.



60944a69ec9c4d7ba755b8c748cfa5d3.jpg



cadf24e3d50844ab9a81c59b929b3a6f.jpg

On the next one camera focused just fine albeit at slow pace only because there was some contrast.



7bf45420fc69481699fb9dc92c9804e7.jpg

Other than that lens focuses very accurately and fast even in low light.

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
 
While waiting for 70-200mm to come back I wrapped my 24-70mm G2 in vinyl.

7f317ff30c13484f87d0a5821d86b393.jpg

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Are you happy with the images and focus speed and accuracy?

Thanks

--
Wishing You Good Light.
Yes. But I was almost happy with G1 version too. But G2 is a little more accurate because I adjust it on the Tap-in.

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Thanks I am reading up on these now as I need to replace my old Tokina 29-70 2.8 AF-D which is having focusing issues.

I am seeing some users say that focus is not great in low light but then I see images from others of stage performances in low light etc.

What are your thoughts on the AF? i.e, Speed, lock on, accuracy and low light.

Thanks!

--
Wishing You Good Light.
There are many different cameras and many different light situations and many different subjects. It is almost impossible to ascertain every single situation. That said I have problems sometime in very drabby light on people faces that are too dark or too light or in back lit situations.

For example this was taken with the flash but if I was not using flash I would have to use ISO 12800 or higher with these parameters. The camera wanted to focus on the background for some reason.

60944a69ec9c4d7ba755b8c748cfa5d3.jpg

cadf24e3d50844ab9a81c59b929b3a6f.jpg

On the next one camera focused just fine albeit at slow pace only because there was some contrast.

7bf45420fc69481699fb9dc92c9804e7.jpg

Other than that lens focuses very accurately and fast even in low light.

--
If I don't respond to your post after you responded to my with NEGATIVE remarks that means you are on my Ignore list.
Photography Director for Whedonopolis.com
Thanks, appreciate the response.

--
Wishing You Good Light.
 
"The camera wanted to focus on the background for some reason."

You should be using single point af preferably using one of the center cross focus points. Focus on the eye. If you can't get focus lock them you should be using the IR focus assist on your speedlight, if you don't want to light up with flash just turn the flash all the way down and point it back over your head, your can still use af assist.

Hth
 
"The camera wanted to focus on the background for some reason."

You should be using single point af preferably using one of the center cross focus points. Focus on the eye. If you can't get focus lock them you should be using the IR focus assist on your speedlight, if you don't want to light up with flash just turn the flash all the way down and point it back over your head, your can still use af assist.
It looks like you think he's a beginner. This isn't the beginner's advice forum. Don't you recognise the situation he's photographing in?
 
"The camera wanted to focus on the background for some reason."

You should be using single point af preferably using one of the center cross focus points. Focus on the eye. If you can't get focus lock them you should be using the IR focus assist on your speedlight, if you don't want to light up with flash just turn the flash all the way down and point it back over your head, your can still use af assist.
It looks like you think he's a beginner. This isn't the beginner's advice forum. Don't you recognise the situation he's photographing in?
Thank you.
 
I'm assuming they don't let girls past the barriers on the red carpet to photograph hobbit stars with their iPhones. If they did there probably wouldn't be any pieces of them left to photograph.
 
Last edited:
"The camera wanted to focus on the background for some reason."

You should be using single point af preferably using one of the center cross focus points.
I do, but not center. Will explain below.
Focus on the eye.
I do.
If you can't get focus lock them you should be using the IR focus assist on your speedlight, if you don't want to light up with flash just turn the flash all the way down and point it back over your head, your can still use af assist.
I have to use flash because room is very dark. It is over 100 feet long 50 feet wide and so high that chandeliers that are 30 years old and dirty don't produce much light. And unlike normal red carpet they don't use back lights, ever, because there are many rooms like these and every hour another press conference going on so it would cost too much for workers to move the lights from room to room. And ComicCon can't afford to buy lights for every room. But this particular room can accommodate a large amount of people like photographers, video people (5 times as many as photographers) and table interviewers, 10x as many as photographers. Oh, and this room does not have windows. Other smaller rooms have windows (still no lights in the back) and I don't have problems there.

And we ALL have an hour!!!!!

So 20 or so photographers get like 5 minutes between all of us. And talent is basically walking. I maybe get 10 seconds to take all my photos. That is full length and close up. And for women maybe over the shoulder. And in this time I have to take 10 to 15 pictures.

If I use center point on the face and refocus not only it takes time but because I am standing close there is no guaranty that the face is going to be in DOF. Yes I could stop down to F8 (notice that I use F3.2 1000 ISO, 1/160) but that creates another problem.

Many talents are sensitive to light. I and all others already blinding the talent with the flashes and I would have to use stronger flash setting if I stop down. Benedict Cumberbatch walked away after about 10 photogs (luckily I was in the first group) and he requested no more than 5 pictures per photog. Peter Capaldi was wearing sun glasses just like in the show. Very smart.

1/160 shutter speed is minimum. I normally use 1/250. If I use less than 1/160 I get motion blur, more blinks etc....so I can't go slower and I can increase flash power.

Now, I hope this explains the situation. If you read the other post of my I said that the problem is with white skin, blond people with blue or light grey eyes. Elijah Wood fits right in to this category.
 
I'm assuming they don't let girls past the barriers on the red carpet to photograph hobbit stars with their iPhones. If they did there probably wouldn't be any pieces of them left to photograph.
They do sometimes have separate area for the fans behind the barrier and with a lot of security. But we get talent first.
 
Well you did miss the shot. Maybe you should stick up for yourself instead of letting your fanboi do it for you. The situation your shooting in could be some comic Con I didn't care to look. Just trying to help you. Merry Christmas.
 
Well you did miss the shot. Maybe you should stick up for yourself instead of letting your fanboi do it for you. The situation your shooting in could be some comic Con I didn't care to look. Just trying to help you. Merry Christmas.
One shot but I took 15 or more.
 
Sounds like a tough job. I'll stick with photography as a hobby. Thanks for the detailed explanation.
 
Well you did miss the shot. Maybe you should stick up for yourself instead of letting your fanboi do it for you. The situation your shooting in could be some comic Con I didn't care to look. Just trying to help you. Merry Christmas.
One shot but I took 15 or more.
Member obviously can't handle the back and forth of the internet, and retreats into weak sarcasm in responses.

Probably just naivety and inexperience that someone with a cute hipster camera can not recognise a shot in a jobbing professional situation when they see it.

By the way, 'fanboy' is not better for writing it as 'fanboi' and was still used as a term of abuse.
 
Last edited:
Nice response about what a professional photographer faces.

About your picture, I do not know what AF mode you used, but I have a feeling that the patterns on the background may have confused the AF system. This could have happened easier if the AF points where spread on all the image. But the D5 has its points more on the center that Elijah actually standing and the patterns are not so obvious.
 
Nice response about what a professional photographer faces.

About your picture, I do not know what AF mode you used, but I have a feeling that the patterns on the background may have confused the AF system.
Normally I use single point but sometimes I use 9 depending on the distance. If I use single I focus on the eye and slightly recompose. If I use 9 I focus on the face which in most cases ends up focusing on the eye anyway because the eyes are the most contasty feature of the face as long as the person is not blond with blue eyes. I have tried focus priority on D5 and it works great in the dark as long as the talent acts normal. But if someone points toward me it becomes a disaster. Few months ago I was at the small theater also dark with only small lights on the ceiling. They did not bring big lights because there was no room. And it was Stan Lee awards. He likes to point fingers at people so all my shots pointing at me were blurry because camera was focusing on his hand. Luckily all other shots him pointing at photographers next to me came out OK.

And yes at ComicCon background can confuse the camera on the wide shots but tight shots are no problem.
This could have happened easier if the AF points where spread on all the image. But the D5 has its points more on the center that Elijah actually standing and the patterns are not so obvious.
I don't know why this happening in these particular rooms. I asked around and other photogs have exactly the same problem. I can even hear that others have a problem because they constantly asking for re-shoots. I just got new flash brackets with a room for a small battery operated video light. I am thinking using it in these rooms just for focusing. Oh, and pattern generated by the flash in AF-S does not work either for some reason.
 
After starting the "switch guard project" to protect the lens (A022) I used a self adhesive tape...........when removing the tape several points about full stop size points of paint came off with the tape......

.. does Tamron use a primer under the black paint?......I see no sign of it.......that's a bit of a "no no" on aluminium, where it is normal to use an acid etch primer.

"So watch protecting the switches with sticky tape"!

Shades of Pentax's FA* silver painted lenses?

--
Dave's clichés
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top