What features do you want in your camera?

Tlon

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
284
Reaction score
33
Location
IL
Hi,

I've long been maintaining a list of features I'd like to see in cameras. Many of them have appeared in new models (for example, the Sony A6300 records the focus point in the EXIF). Some of them, however, are still missing. Here is my list:

- Very long exposure (up to an hour at least). it would save me carrying a remote and using a stopwatch (app).

- Record the virtual horizon in the EXIF (if possible, at a resolution > 0.1 degrees). The camera is not always level when you press the shutter, but this would make post processing easier.

- DNG instead of a proprietary raw format.

- Show a countdown on the screen using long exposures, and again during dark frame subtraction. the digits should be small so they won't kill your night vision.

- Support for multiple exposures in camera, without any moving parts (so the camera does not move between exposures). This will enable mimicking lower ISOs (for example, if you average 10 exposures at ISO 100, you get the same amount of light as ISO 10). Not only will this reduce the need for ND filters, it will also improve IQ because it won't throw away information (for example, a 3-stop ND filter throws away 7/8 of the photons). you get better SNR and higher DR*.

- Support for in-camera raw averaging. this is an addition to the previous point, but it will enable doing *long* exposures. You don't want to keep 1,000 nearly-identical files on your card instead of using a 10-stop ND filter. Instead, the camera should keep the first raw file (just to be safe) and an average of all of the exposures in the sequence. The bit depth of the average file should be higher (for example, 10 bits more for a 1,000 exposure average)**.

- An easily accessible information screen so you can get the camera back should you lose it.

I'm curious to know if you thought of any other features.

Even you don't like a feature, please don't try to convince people it's useless - different people have different needs and I, for one, would love to have all of the above features in my A6300***. However, if you have a suggestion for a feature that improves on another feature, please explain.

So, what cool features would you like to see?

* I once averaged 80 exposures of a Canon A710 (a compact from 2006) at ISO 80. I could see the noise difference not just from a single ISO 80 exposure, but also from an average of 10 ISO 80 exposures.

** It might not be 10 stops, but the bit depth is certainly higher. Cameras have minimum ISOs because the sensors behind each pixel can record only a limited number of photons, but averaging them in the camera solves this problem (the result will not be identical but it will be very close). This will simulate much lower ISOs (for example, averaging 100 exposures at ISO 100 will give the camera the same amount of information as ISO 1).

*** And also the ability to see the frame number in the camera. why isn't this information available anywhere in the A6300?!?
 
I would like a nice, simple user interface and menu system without hundreds of options that I will never use.
 
Silent “quiet shutter” mode

More accurate/consistent AF.

Multi distance, multi focal length, auto adjusting auto focus fine tune.

I guess cleaner high ISO and greater bit depth at high ISO.
 
Pure film-like image quality. Everything else is just a bonus.
 
"Support for multiple exposures in camera, without any moving parts (so the camera does not move between exposures)."

Camera movement is not a big problem. Most multi-image algorithms include auto alignment of the images in the set -- for instance, Sony's "Hand Held Twilight". I see Affinity Photo offers some multi-image methods too, as does the subscription Photoshop.
 
Silent “quiet shutter” mode
Sony's top models can be completely silent.
More accurate/consistent AF.

Multi distance, multi focal length, auto adjusting auto focus fine tune.
Any good mirrorless camera does this. Only SLRs need focus adjustments.
I guess cleaner high ISO and greater bit depth at high ISO.
Difficult because in bad light there really are not enough photons for a smooth image. A bigger sensor helps.
 
Pure film-like image quality. Everything else is just a bonus.
That depends on what features of which film you want to simulate. Converting a raw file to B&W and then applying a suitable curve can get you close, in my opinion.



3b9f07b30094414d8a7942c4eb22d95c.jpg
 
Last edited:
Silent “quiet shutter” mode
Sony's top models can be completely silent.
but they’re Sony.
More accurate/consistent AF.

Multi distance, multi focal length, auto adjusting auto focus fine tune.
Any good mirrorless camera does this. Only SLRs need focus adjustments.
I guess when Nikon brings out their full frame mirrorless, i’ll be covered then. Then I’ll probably wish for an OVF.
I guess cleaner high ISO and greater bit depth at high ISO.
Difficult because in bad light there really are not enough photons for a smooth image. A bigger sensor helps.
So because it’s difficult I should take it off my list? I’m using as big a sensor as is practical for what I do. Yes, that’s right. Even if medium format was cheaper for a full system than 35mm, I still wouldn’t use it because of the lens size/weight that would be required.
 
Photoshop Elements 11 Photo Editor has 3 levels for the user: Quick, Guided or Expert, why not on a camera.
 
- Minimum shutter speed management with 3 modes. Manual. Auto 1, for user motion : shutter speed would be set depending on the equivalent focal length, OIS/IBIS measured user movements, OIS/IBIS efficiency. Auto 2, for subject motion : shutter speed would be set depending on moving subjects apparent speed (would work along with AF tracking).

- TAv mode (M + auto ISO) full implementation : on many cameras it is not possible to use exposure compensation or auto exposure lock in this mode.

- Raw histogram.

- Light meter features. For example display the total dynamic range of a scene. Display the difference in EV between two successive metering.

- Display the apparent speed of a tracked subject. This would make it possible to set the shutter speed without relying on empirical methods.

- Separate exposure control for raw and JPEG, with separate exposure compensations. Raw would be ETTR by default.

- Multiple spot metering for multiple off camera flash. This would allow for example metering separately for key and fill light.
 
Last edited:
I would like a camera with two eyepieces, viewing two screens.

If you have switched from a monocular microscope to a binocular one, you will know how much more comfortable the viewing is, even though the image is flat.

Better still would be a stereo mirrorless camera with two eyepieces.
 
- Very long exposure (up to an hour at least). it would save me carrying a remote and using a stopwatch (app).
Not very useful for the kind of stuff I do, but obviously of use to many people.
- Record the virtual horizon in the EXIF (if possible, at a resolution > 0.1 degrees). The camera is not always level when you press the shutter, but this would make post processing easier.
I'd like to see that info recorded, but not for PP. I often take photos at various non-level angles, I'd like to be able to sort or organize based on that. Very interesting.
- DNG instead of a proprietary raw format.
Not a bad idea. I think some cameras do that already?
- Show a countdown on the screen using long exposures, and again during dark frame subtraction. the digits should be small so they won't kill your night vision.
This would also be a candidate for info on a top LCD panel that many camera have.
- Support for multiple exposures in camera, without any moving parts (so the camera does not move between exposures). This will enable mimicking lower ISOs (for example, if you average 10 exposures at ISO 100, you get the same amount of light as ISO 10).
...
- Support for in-camera raw averaging. this is an addition to the previous point, but it will enable doing *long* exposures.
I'd have to think of that math a bit more on those. It would appear that somewhat similar features are being released on some newer cameras, so this might be something we see at some point soon?
- An easily accessible information screen so you can get the camera back should you lose it.
What did you have in mind?
I'm curious to know if you thought of any other features.
I think some cameras record the distance as focused. My camera might, but I have not (yet) figured out how to mine that info.
 
- Very long exposure (up to an hour at least). it would save me carrying a remote and using a stopwatch (app).
Not very useful for the kind of stuff I do, but obviously of use to many people.
- Record the virtual horizon in the EXIF (if possible, at a resolution > 0.1 degrees). The camera is not always level when you press the shutter, but this would make post processing easier.
I'd like to see that info recorded, but not for PP. I often take photos at various non-level angles, I'd like to be able to sort or organize based on that. Very interesting.
- DNG instead of a proprietary raw format.
Not a bad idea. I think some cameras do that already?
- Show a countdown on the screen using long exposures, and again during dark frame subtraction. the digits should be small so they won't kill your night vision.
This would also be a candidate for info on a top LCD panel that many camera have.
- Support for multiple exposures in camera, without any moving parts (so the camera does not move between exposures). This will enable mimicking lower ISOs (for example, if you average 10 exposures at ISO 100, you get the same amount of light as ISO 10).
...
- Support for in-camera raw averaging. this is an addition to the previous point, but it will enable doing *long* exposures.
I'd have to think of that math a bit more on those. It would appear that somewhat similar features are being released on some newer cameras, so this might be something we see at some point soon?
- An easily accessible information screen so you can get the camera back should you lose it.
What did you have in mind?
Simple: it'd be nice if the start-up screen of the camera showed my details. Pressing any of the keys would show you the normal screen, but if somebody wanted to return the camera to you it'd be very useful.
I'm curious to know if you thought of any other features.
I think some cameras record the distance as focused. My camera might, but I have not (yet) figured out how to mine that info.
 
with customizable cropping. Also customizable menu à la smartphone or if that's too much at least intelligible headings.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top