My Pen-F Love Story - or the long awaited delivery on the Panasonic L1 concept

BrianY

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
259
Reaction score
58
Location
OK, US
Man, is it a good time in photography! I've generally stayed behind the bleeding edge as it is smarter for my pocketbook and I'm glad to let others sort out the headaches on the new stuff. I like to see real word experience from others before I smack down my hard-earned dough. Picking up lightly used gear is how I roll, and I was hanging out here and learning so much when the Oly forum was dominated by the effusive curmudgeon Bill Turner! I even think I sold some pieces of kit to Bill back in the day.

My first DSLR was the Oly E-500 which then led me to buy a used E-1. That camera was an ergonomic masterpiece and opened my eyes to the joy of photography. I later bought the Panasonic L1 and had great hopes for it, but it simply was a design before its time. The rangefinder concept was novel, but the bulk defeated the design in practice. I sold it to someone year's ago who was teaching their daughter photography. The manual controls would be good for that, but it failed to deliver on the promise of four thirds with respect to size.

Fast forward to a stent with the Canon 5D and 7D, which were amazing tech, but big bodies with even bigger lenses! Then came the Oly E-P1. One of the few things I have bought brand spankin' new. It was a strong move toward the right form factor, but no built in EVF and poor AF left me handicapped. Then I picked up a GX1 with it's external EVF (which I still have and use with the still amazing LX7). Better still, but not there yet.

Finally, prime time arrived with the E-M5 and the E-M1. I still have and use both, as my skill set is well matched to these cameras and they continue to generally do everything I need. I took two E-M1 bodies on a photo safari to Yellowstone and was absolutely thrilled at their performance. I honestly lacked for nothing. But the E-M5 shows its age a little these days and I've been waiting all along for that rangefinder concept to be fulfilled. The promise of the old Pana L1 still tugged at me. The E-M1 is practical and utilitarian in design and will do anything I need, but If photography is art, then I guess I've been waiting for the tool to become an inspiring part of the art itself. I've been waiting for the heir to L1.

Enter the Pen-F. I wanted one the second I saw it, but could certainly not justify the ambitious price tag when I already had great equipment and no intentions of selling my current gear (I regret selling my original E-1 to this very day!) So I patiently waited. And waited. And waited. And last week I found it. Lovingly used. Black. Pristine. Dials and buttons abounding. It called to me and I finally answered.

Everything feels right to me with this camera (while plenty of others would disagree - that's why this is such a wonderful time, as there are abundant options for every budget and taste). I first played around with the 17mm f1.8 and took a few pics. So far, not much luck with subject matter. Then I pulled out my forlorn 45mm f1.8 from the bottom of the bag. I rarely use it, as I have always favored the fast zooms on the E-M1. And there it was - a match made in heaven. And here are my kids, frozen in a fleeting moment. A memory for a lifetime. It really is a wonderful time in photography - and I look forward to making my own art with this gem. We are just getting started...

Tempus Fugit.

9336816967cd4ffa841a1785e008ed70.jpg



a72b26b661764c689012299fae7c369d.jpg
 
Good post, Brian. Enjoy your new camera! I most definitely do. Ever since I got mine, it comes with me everywhere. It's not the type of camera that likes to stay at home...
 
Nice read Brian. Yep, I agree. It is a great time for photography and like you, I enjoy my Pen-F very much. It's the very best camera I have owned so far.

How did you like your Canon 7D? I owned one, and I admit it's a great camera, but a bloody boat anchor.

Cheers

Wayne
 
Thanks for reading, Wayne. I sold the 5Dmkii years ago when I went to m43. I kept the 7D with 17-55mm all these years. It has been sitting in a box in a closet. I finally picked it up last week and said to myself -- it's time to sell, as I will never use this thing again.

Anchor is an apt description for that behemoth - especially with the grip! The bulky ergonomics feel completely foreign to me now. I find it not only heavy, but also uncomfortable in use. While I'm sure I could retrain my hands to deal with it, I think I'll pass on carrying a tank around my neck and stick with my formidable group of small, comfortable and capable Oly bodies.

Warm regards,

Brian
 
Thanks, Brian. The Pen F is very special. I acquired one 18 months ago. I can truly say I've never been attached to a camera as much as I am to this one. Your story resonates with me, including coming from the classic near-perfect DSLR (!) E-1.

The Pen F is made for small lenses, you know that. My favorite is the M.Zuiko 12mm f/2. It's nothing less than a jewel on the Pen F. I also keep a PL 25mm f/1.4 and 45mm f/1.8.



I purchased an M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 Pro for a trip earlier this year. It's a marvelous zoom, even on the diminutive Pen F. I struggle, though, whether to put my 12mm and 45mm in the bag with me, or just head out with the Pro zoom. It's nice to have a choice, but sometimes the choice is neither easy nor clear.

Pen F rules! I'm considering a second body. Pen F? OM-D? G9? Dunno. Nice to have choices.


Jim Pilcher
Summit County, Colorado, USA
Life is good in the woods
 
Agree with everything you said, Jim! Thanks for feeding my newly rekindled GAS with all that 12mm f2.0 talk! I'm all filled up on gear right now, but it is definitely on the list of consideration. So are a 7-14mm and any of the f1.2 PRO stuff. Obviously those big, fast lenses are better mated to the E-M1, but I'm sure I can make one work with the Pen;-). My Pana 12-35 f2.8 seems well proportioned on the Pen-F in my preliminary thoughts.

As to taking pics of a photogenic camera - here you go! The 17mm is a perfect fit. I also just discovered the Peak Design gear as I've honestly not looked at any photo sites in a very long time. I bought a Leash and a Cuff and I'm good to go. Switching between hand strap and neck strap in seconds. Added a soft release shutter button and finished with a Gariz half case, as I've had one on my E-M5 for years. They are impeccably made and truly augment the character and usability of the body. I really liked their implementation of adding purchase to the front without really adding any bulk at all.

Cheers and happy shooting,

Brian

PS - I'll have to hit you up sometime for the best hikes and hidden locales to shoot in Summit County!

695768f1f8594c53b14a09bd01b8938f.jpg

--
Though we may have precious little, it's still precious...
 
Last edited:
That is a very nice appreciation of this camera. I bought mine (refurbished) as a second body, but it quickly took first place and I now grab it in most circumstances.

There are still a couple of places it lags and that is in video (would be really nice to have an external mic input) and any sort of action photos (contrast detect just doesn't cut it). But I suspect it is currently the best IQ Olympus body and it is a joy to handle (except for that danged tripod socket).

It would be a shame if Olympus does not follow up and create a digital Pen FT, fixing these issues.
 
As for the second body - I'd suggest looking at a used E-M1. I have two as I wanted total consistency on my big Yellowstone trip. I keep one gripped and one without, ready to go whenever. It is amazing and truly a joy to use. It feels like a conventional DSLR and while not quite the masterpiece in the hand that I recall the E-1 to be, it is darn close. Having a weather sealed body lets you do what you want to do regardless of conditions. Another factor I considered in a brief debate between the Pen-F and a Pana GX85 was batteries. The Pen-F, E-M1 MkI and E-M5 MkI all use the same battery, so packing for trips with these three bodies is a very streamlined affair and I always have plenty around the house.

If money were no object, I'd consider an E-M1MkII or the G9. The new Panny camera looks amazing, but obviously both remain at premium pricing. However, there is a very good chance the G9 will be my next body, but I've got two three years to figure that one out. For now, it's just time to go take more pics.

B

--
Though we may have precious little, it's still precious...
 
Last edited:
Thanks for reading. Video is always just a bonus to me on these bodies, but never a driving force. I use it on occasion, but the files just sit on my laptop and I'm never very motivated to do anything with them. Stills are my main interest, so I'm happy with 1080 and suspect I will be for years to come. As for the tripod socket, the Gariz half-case solves the lens mount issue , though it moves the socket away from center alignment with the lens. Since this camera is intended as my main walk-about, tripod use will likely be rare and would generally be landscape/wide-angle use. That said, it was an odd design choice by Oly and could be an issue for some I'm sure.

Cheers,

Brian
 
We all might pine for something different. Mine was the thought that the LC1 with a replaceable mount as a systems camera. At the time there was hushed talk of a possible LC2 that would fill the bill. Even though the LC1 was huge, used a 2/3 sensor and felt like a hollow box. It was a great ergonomic design and the lens was brilliant.

We received the L1 instead with its Porro evf. I did not excite this fellow - he stuck with his Canon EF mount system for a while longer. In fact I used multiple bodies each with a semi-permanent lens - this worked well but made for a huge system to carry about - especially as I was using it with big lenses and tripods. No hurried juggle-swapping of lenses in the field, in the dark, or in inclement conditions.

Flash forward quite a few years. I am back with the Olympus/Panasonic group - now with multiple GM camera bodies each with a lens. Now I can have multiple cameras with me in one easily carried bag instead of filling a car boot (trunk) with gear.

But traditionally most are still in the one camera body - multiple lenses frame of mind.

But it is great to be able to find and use the type of kit that suits our particular purpose.
 
A lot of folks reading may have never even heard of the Panasonic L1. It was one of the earliest bodies to use the 4/3 sensor. While at the time, the wonderful high grade and super high grade lenses from Olympus were almost unparalleled, the bodies were not much less in size than APS-C. Oddly, from the front, you could easily confuse the L1 with today's m4/3 bodies. Viewing from the top and holding in the hand is another story. It was fat. No way around it. Getting rid of the mirror changed the game!

de268942fc6d4dc8b9f1f0b092fce300.jpg.png

148ee37d2853467698739cef6259d480.jpg.png

--
Though we may have precious little, it's still precious...
 
Last edited:
Thanks for reading, Wayne. I sold the 5Dmkii years ago when I went to m43. I kept the 7D with 17-55mm all these years. It has been sitting in a box in a closet. I finally picked it up last week and said to myself -- it's time to sell, as I will never use this thing again.

Anchor is an apt description for that behemoth - especially with the grip! The bulky ergonomics feel completely foreign to me now. I find it not only heavy, but also uncomfortable in use. While I'm sure I could retrain my hands to deal with it, I think I'll pass on carrying a tank around my neck and stick with my formidable group of small, comfortable and capable Oly bodies.
I like your description of behemoth and tank. Talking about tank. A few years back I watched a review on, I believe, "DigitalRev TV." They really put that 7D through it's passes to see how rugged that monster is. They dropped it down stairs, froze it in a small tank of water, and set it on fire. After all the abuse it was given, the bugger still worked. I originally purchased the 7D for BIF photography, but carrying that thing around with a heavy tripod and lens became more of a workout than anything else. Then I decided to go with the M4/3 system and haven't looked back. You just can't beet it. The idea of trudging around with your camera gear is to achieve a good measure of enjoyment out of your photo taking. How can you when you become so fatigued carrying a boat anchor around your neck, or over your shoulder with tripod and lens that is so heavy it could sink a small row boat. After awhile all you want to do is go home and lie in a hot tub. Sod that nonsense. Now I use my Pen-F. What can I say about such a stellar camera. Its a pleasure using it. Even carrying it around is a pleasure, not a chore.

Cheers

Wayne
Warm regards,

Brian
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top