***Weekly Wildlife Thread: Jul 30th - Aug 5th***

Nice work for the old camera! My oldest now is my A580, but had the A550 before it and it did a fine job. That's probably the system that really got me deeper into wildlife photos - the A300 was my DSLR entry point, but the A550 really stepped up the game with sensor and focus improvements.
 
Very cute rabbits. I get the conundrum - we don't get many rabbits around my yard or area, but we do get lots of green iguanas...and they're just as prone to eat flowers and decorative plants. Many people hate them, but I've always found them endearing - even though they much flowerbeds. Though coyotes probably wouldn't mess with green iguanas unless they were already dead - they've got some nice armor on them, hard to eat with all the spikes on their back, and that tail will whip around and cause some pain. Coyotes are a little too meek to deal with all that for a meal when they could find something softer and easier!

If you do get the coyotes around - take some photos...they're quite cute too and I miss having them around as I never see them down here in Florida.
 
Beautiful light and some lovely ducks here, as well as lots of closeups and shots on the cormorants. Certainly looks like that new combo is working quite well - hopefully you'll get the MFA all dialed in so you can just enjoy it.
 
Thank you for your kind words and for hosting this topic. It is one of the topics that I always click on. Anyway, I am attaching one of the very few coyote photos that I have ever taken. It was taken 9 years ago on Cape Breton Island in the Canadian Atlantic. When I took the photo the coyote was trying to scratch his ear with his back leg. He ended up falling over but I missed that shot. At first I thought it was kind of funny. Later that year there was national media coverage about coyotes killing a female hiker on the same island. They are not as cute as they look. We have some modest rural recreation property. A local farmer has two dogs to protect his poultry from coyotes.



92e9af409b814feebd1423b0c34aa60d.jpg
 
Later that year there was national media coverage about coyotes killing a female hiker on the same island. They are not as cute as they look.
They can definitely be pests and predators...though generally they're not known for human attacks...they tend more often to go after pets left outside, small farm animals, etc. I lived in California which was coyote central - long before they had spread themselves through the rest of the US in larger numbers, they were incredibly populous in California, even in urban areas. I saw and encountered them routinely - I've surprised them coming out my front door, passed them on trails, and had them jump across the road on my bike nearly hitting them. My father who lives in California even had one as a pet alongside his sheppard/doberman mix...it had been abandoned as a pup in his yard and the big dog took it in like its own - so he kept it for 11 long years - when the sheppard mix died, the coyote was distraught and spent days on end sitting out in the yard, not eating and refusing to come inside...until it died about two weeks later - seemingly from heartbreak.

There are occasional stories of coyotes seeing an opportunity to snatch a small child, but for the most part attacks on humans are immensely rare, except defensive bites, or very desperate, starving animals or sick animals. Note that the unfortunate woman killed in Cape Breton is to date the only known fatality of an adult by a coyote anywhere in the world, ever...and the only other known fatality of a person was back in 1981 when a 3-year old was killed in California. It really is pretty rare...and probably less common than the danger of a stray dog or even an aggressive pet killing someone.

Not to say caution shouldn't be taken with any wild animal, especially one that can bite - but I wouldn't think there's much need to fear them as you might a large brown bear, or a wolf...which can be much larger and more aggressive to adult humans.

My biggest scare when living in California was when out hiking in state park lands about 5 miles from urban areas on a long mountain trail, and coming upon a mountain lion. Now those can be rightfully feared by any size adult! Fortunately it stayed on its hill and I descended down the opposite direction calmly as I could, looking back as I reached the bottom of the hill for any sign it was following or tracking me. I made it back home and never saw it again...but it took the rest of that day for my heart rate to go down!
 
Once again, thanks for taking the time to reply. I am actually looking forward to seeing some of your "California coyotes" later this year when we go to Death Valley National Park. I was there many years ago with my nephews and had a couple of minor and peaceful encounters with coyotes. Once, a pack of coyotes entered the highway and stopped in the middle of the road - forcing our rental car to come to a halt. Then, one of them walked over to the drivers side and essentially waited for a "treat." I was tempted as the animal was mostly skin and bones but, as the responsible uncle I thought I should set a good example and obey the "do not feed the wildlife" signs that were posted in the park. Then, when I was filling up our car at a gas station at night (I believe it was at a place called Stovepipe Wells) I felt something brush against the back of my leg. I turned around to see a coyote walking away. This was in the "film" era and therefore no handy smartphone to snap a photo. But this time I am taking my trusty digital camera and hopefully will get some decent photos. If I do I'll post them here.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a birder but I took a walk in the park on Wednesday with my new A9. Walking in the park in Houston, Texas means early morning so these are all at very high ISOs. Nevertheless, and with an adapted lens, the A9 was crazy good.

ISO 25,600

ISO 25,600

View: original size

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 3 stops. ISO invariance is a good thing!

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 3 stops. ISO invariance is a good thing!

View: original size

ISO 12,800. Wing touching the water.

ISO 12,800. Wing touching the water.

View: original size

ISO 20,000. Cropped about 50%.

ISO 20,000. Cropped about 50%.

View: original size

ISO 20,000. About 50% crop.

ISO 20,000. About 50% crop.

View: original size

Same as above.

Same as above.

View: original size

ISO 12,800. About 50% crop.

ISO 12,800. About 50% crop.

View: original size

ISO 12,800. About 50% crop.

ISO 12,800. About 50% crop.

View: original size

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 2 stops. Fixed in Lightroom.

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 2 stops. Fixed in Lightroom.

View: original size

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 2 stops. Fixed in Lightroom.

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 2 stops. Fixed in Lightroom.

View: original size

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 2 stops. Fixed in Lightroom.

ISO 1,000 but underexposed about 2 stops. Fixed in Lightroom.

View: original size

I thought my A99ii and my Canon 1DX had excellent AF capabilities, and they do. But they can't touch the A9. Not even close. IQ isn't bad either!

--
Gary
 
Wow - those are indeed impressive Gary - especially seeing the ISO 20,000 crops. I've occasionally had to push to ISO12,800 on my A6300, and it's usable in daylight, but definitely grainier than that and still with a little less detail retention. Also nice to see the adapted lenses working so well with that system.

I'm likely picking up the FE100-400mm and 1.4x TC in the next few weeks to use on my A6300, but I'm always seriously considering that A9 as a future purchase if I decide to go full frame - the tracking performance and high ISO looks wonderful.
 
Nice going with bird shots.
 
Those are all better than I get with my A-68 nicely exposed at ISO-1600 ;-)

Nice shootin.
 
Nice going with bird shots.
Yeah, but you had to blow me out of the water with your 100-400 G Master shots!

Seriously, the sharpness of that lens is just astounding. DXO has it measured at 35 whereas the Canon 100-400 L2 - the standard before - is 24. Your pictures prove it.

I'm waiting though for it to be available on Adorama, just because that's where I bought my A9 and paid for the VIP program.
 
Wow - those are indeed impressive Gary - especially seeing the ISO 20,000 crops. I've occasionally had to push to ISO12,800 on my A6300, and it's usable in daylight, but definitely grainier than that and still with a little less detail retention. Also nice to see the adapted lenses working so well with that system.

I'm likely picking up the FE100-400mm and 1.4x TC in the next few weeks to use on my A6300, but I'm always seriously considering that A9 as a future purchase if I decide to go full frame - the tracking performance and high ISO looks wonderful.
 
With your A9 I am sure that you will be getting amazingly sharp photos. It handles really well and I use the battery grip for better balance on both my E- mount cameras.
 
Gary, nice shots! It is really good to see the A9 getting some positive reviews on the DSLT side of the house! For BIF no less! And with an adapter! Congrats on the photos and your A9! Regards, Dean
 
Roscoe, excellent series as per usual! I particularly enjoy the insects and the closeup of the sandhill crane's head. Unfortunately the photo of the Anhinga makes me feel a little queasy, like I may have had a too much bourbon this afternoon! Regards, Dean
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top