6D2 DR my own test

Downloaded some pictures from Image Resource and matched all the settings to my 6D in LR, ISO 100. I can see that 6D2 performed worse, there way more chrome noise.

Your input guys please?

6D vs 5D4 ISO 100

Mariux said:

6D vs 5D4 ISO 100

Click to expand...

I would have preferred, that you pushed an underexposed file, rather than this one, wich become badly overexposed.

That's said, I agree, that the 6dmk2 have more chroma noise, and that the 5dmk4 is better

--
It's all about photography

agree but i don't have a file like that.

Mariux said:

agree but i don't have a file like that.

Click to expand...

I think that you do, on this very website.

Same results as before, so does not really matter what image i use as long as there is shadow to pul.

Using someone else’s files does not a good test make, IMO. You don’t know exactly what went into creating them. If you’re going to critique the performance of something, you need to have control of all aspects of the test.

Jack

Well i've just tested this from 2 different sources and results are the same so i'm not expecting the results will differ even if i had 6D2 to test myself. If i'm wrong and results do differ i will eat my shoe

Mariux said:

Well i've just tested this from 2 different sources and results are the same so i'm not expecting the results will differ even if i had 6D2 to test myself. If i'm wrong and results do differ i will eat my shoe

Click to expand...

Try Crystal Hot Sauce. It'll make a plywood samich taste good! :-D

David

And what does it look like with chroma NR? There's a reason why the LR default setting for NR has chroma at 25. Color noise is very easy to remove with absolutely no loss of detail. You have to turn chroma NR up really high for it to have a detrimental effect on the image. A few years ago a lot of people on these forums were claiming that Nikon baked color NR into their RAWs, to give them an artificial advantage over Canon RAWs. When you're looking at images on a testing site, processed from RAW with all NR turned off, you get a very misleading impression of what you can do with the camera. I have the color NR slider at the default setting of 25 for all except very high ISO shots. So, differences in chroma noise between cameras are completely irrelevant to the results you can get, unless it's so bad that moderate chroma NR settings can't eliminate it. These don't look to be like that at all. Luminance noise is what can make a difference to shots, not chroma noise.

Alastair Norcross said:

Color noise is very easy to remove with absolutely no loss of detail.

Click to expand...

That's complete b...ll...cks. Below is Dpreview's DR test scene pushed 4 EV. Chroma NR settings in LR for the 6DII were "Color" 23, "Details" 81, "Smoothness" 70 (at 50 you get rather ugly blotches of colour that would be detrimental even at smaller print sizes).





I guess that whether that matters or not depends on the application though. I suppose that printed on cheap magazine paper in a small format, the difference will be inconsequential.

Mariux said:

Well i've just tested this from 2 different sources and results are the same so i'm not expecting the results will differ even if i had 6D2 to test myself. If i'm wrong and results do differ i will eat my shoe

Click to expand...

make sure pour some salad dressing, makes your shoes taste better and go down easier :-D

I will keep this in mind