Billingham Rucksack 35 first impression

Philippe Castagna

Leading Member
Messages
575
Solutions
2
Reaction score
100
Location
FR
Hi Phillippe,

Thanks for sharing! I've been eyeing this rucksack for quite a while but there's not been many opinions on them online. I really enjoyed reading your post and also seeing all the pictures. I currently use the hadley digital in the same color as you. May try and buy this bag in the future for travel but I'm currently satisfied :)
 
Hi Phillippe,

Thanks for sharing! I've been eyeing this rucksack for quite a while but there's not been many opinions on them online. I really enjoyed reading your post and also seeing all the pictures. I currently use the hadley digital in the same color as you. May try and buy this bag in the future for travel but I'm currently satisfied :)
Hi,

Thank you for your kind word and I’m glad that you appreciated my post.

In the course of August will publish a full review which will describe experiences with the bag within several type of conditions of use. Hope that will help you even more to make your choice.

Have a great evening.
 
Thanks for the great write up. Weird coincidence that I was just looking at this pack as a solution for cycling with camera and accessories (like water and clothing) before I saw your post. I appreciate the detail you provided and good images showing the pack's construction. I hope you will post an alert when you do a followup piece on your experience in the field. Regards.
 
Very interesting. I'm still confused as to the practicality of loading everything vertically, in terms of accessibility and actual storage. Can you post pictures of the main compartment with camera and lenses in?

The 'problem' with the Hadley Pro, that I love, is that it is just too narrow to put my camera, Fuji X-T1, at right angles. It has to go in along the bags length, not its width as I'd prefer. It's 'narrowness' also prevents the camera going in 'lengthways' with the vertical grip fitted. This means I can't maximise my use of space in the bag. It's a minor inconvenience though, as all bags have compromises. With the rucksack I can't see how the space can be maximisedat all, as only one short divider and the bag is sooooo deep. Does that make sense? Real world photos would help. It's a GREAT looking bag though. Thanks for posting. :-)
 
Thanks for the great write up. Weird coincidence that I was just looking at this pack as a solution for cycling with camera and accessories (like water and clothing) before I saw your post. I appreciate the detail you provided and good images showing the pack's construction. I hope you will post an alert when you do a followup piece on your experience in the field. Regards.
I JS,

Thank you for your kind word and that you appreciate my post.

Could you please describe the camera and clothing that you would like to carry with you. Will then be able to tell you if it can fit in the bag properlly.

Concerning the water, the attachment outside is a good solution.

Definitely yes you will get an alert as soon that I will launch the full review.

Thank again for stopping by!
 
Very interesting. I'm still confused as to the practicality of loading everything vertically, in terms of accessibility and actual storage. Can you post pictures of the main compartment with camera and lenses in?

The 'problem' with the Hadley Pro, that I love, is that it is just too narrow to put my camera, Fuji X-T1, at right angles. It has to go in along the bags length, not its width as I'd prefer. It's 'narrowness' also prevents the camera going in 'lengthways' with the vertical grip fitted. This means I can't maximise my use of space in the bag. It's a minor inconvenience though, as all bags have compromises. With the rucksack I can't see how the space can be maximisedat all, as only one short divider and the bag is sooooo deep. Does that make sense? Real world photos would help. It's a GREAT looking bag though. Thanks for posting. :-)
Hi Optimus,

I'm a prime lens guy also so I'm really jealous of your nickname ;)

I'm able to fit my canon 6D with the 135mm f/2L mounted on it (lens hood reversed) facing down, perfectly in the hadley Pro. I do not use grip but the 6D even it's the smallest full frame dslr, still remain pretty wide. But I have no issue at all with it.

I can imagine that with the grip, the xt1 could create a bulk. But without it, it should be perfect.

Also which lens are you using which is too long to allow you put your camera as I do?

On my site you can check the review that I made last year of the Hadley Pro if this can help.

Regarding the Rucksack 35, will made a full review in the course of august which will have a lot of images with the equipment loaded.

I will post when it will be available.

Feel free to answer me here or in MP if you need more info.

Thank again for stopping by!
 
Hi Philippe. I would probably just carry one camera body - X-T1 or E-E2 - with one lens attached, 23mm f/1.4 or 35mm f/2 or 56mm f/1.2. Also lens cleaning cloth, spare batteries. But I might want to put a jacket in somewhere and a phone and a sandwich. Can you easily separate the camera section from sundries? Can you easily access the camera when you're carrying extra stuff, or would you have to unpack to get the camera out of the bottom? I'm also thinking a pack like a Lowepro Slingshot: http://store.lowepro.com/ca/sling-bags

Glad to hear why you chose the Billingham configuration.
 
Hi Philippe. I would probably just carry one camera body - X-T1 or E-E2 - with one lens attached, 23mm f/1.4 or 35mm f/2 or 56mm f/1.2. Also lens cleaning cloth, spare batteries. But I might want to put a jacket in somewhere and a phone and a sandwich. Can you easily separate the camera section from sundries? Can you easily access the camera when you're carrying extra stuff, or would you have to unpack to get the camera out of the bottom? I'm also thinking a pack like a Lowepro Slingshot: http://store.lowepro.com/ca/sling-bags

Glad to hear why you chose the Billingham configuration.
Hi JS,

If the jacket is fold-able and not too thick, with the rest of the items you listed, it should fit perfectly.

Regarding internal organization, One camera + lens will takes less than half of the insert, which leaves you the other side for sandwich and others stuff. You can also remove totally the insert, wrap the camera in something and have even more space.

Do not forget also that the external pocket is pretty spacious and can hold keys, wallet, snacks, flashlight, little bike tools... And with a really convenient access and secured lock.

The main reason why I like to use a shoulder bags generally is the access. You have everything under your hand. With a rucksack you have always at a moment something under something else. But do not forget that the Rucksack 35 is a small bag so it is never too much that you have to move to access something. Do not think that it will really be an issue.

I fall in love for Billingham for several reasons. They have a customer service topnotch, their fabric is beautiful, durable and totally rainproof. With the Lowepro, you will need to cover the bag with the protection. With the Billingham you can just continue under the rain and you will be wet when the inside of the bag will remain totally dry. Also I like the concept of open space instead of the over pre-engeneered one which is proposed by others brand. The last point is that the bag is really light empty.

I tried a few years ago a slingshot and didn't really like the feeling when wear. But I think that this point is really personal.

Hope that I answer your question otherwise feel free to ask for clarify.

Have a great day!
 
Very interesting. I'm still confused as to the practicality of loading everything vertically, in terms of accessibility and actual storage. Can you post pictures of the main compartment with camera and lenses in?

The 'problem' with the Hadley Pro, that I love, is that it is just too narrow to put my camera, Fuji X-T1, at right angles. It has to go in along the bags length, not its width as I'd prefer. It's 'narrowness' also prevents the camera going in 'lengthways' with the vertical grip fitted. This means I can't maximise my use of space in the bag. It's a minor inconvenience though, as all bags have compromises. With the rucksack I can't see how the space can be maximisedat all, as only one short divider and the bag is sooooo deep. Does that make sense? Real world photos would help. It's a GREAT looking bag though. Thanks for posting. :-)
Hi Optimus,

I'm a prime lens guy also so I'm really jealous of your nickname ;)
Thanks! It has so far been the only username I've wanted, that someone else hasn't chosen already.
I'm able to fit my canon 6D with the 135mm f/2L mounted on it (lens hood reversed) facing down, perfectly in the hadley Pro. I do not use grip but the 6D even it's the smallest full frame dslr, still remain pretty wide. But I have no issue at all with it.
If the Billingham pack is placed on its back are the dimensions sufficient that you'd say the X-T1 would fit lying with its 'side' lying on the back of the pack, or only if it was put in with its 'bottom' or 'top' lying on the back of the Billingham back pack.
I can imagine that with the grip, the xt1 could create a bulk. But without it, it should be perfect.

Also which lens are you using which is too long to allow you put your camera as I do?
No, not a long lens, that's my point. Having short primes / zooms the pack seems too long. You said there was only one narrow divider so you'd have to stack a number of primes etc in the same space, as you can't separate each one. I prefer the larger, faster primes, but the newer primes are even smaller making the likelihood of 'wasted space' more of a worry. I'm sure a 100-400 will fit fine, and that's the largest lens Fuji currently do.
On my site you can check the review that I made last year of the Hadley Pro if this can help.
I actually have one myself, hence my observation. It's lovely.
Regarding the Rucksack 35, will made a full review in the course of august which will have a lot of images with the equipment loaded.

I will post when it will be available.

Feel free to answer me here or in MP if you need more info.
I thought I'd post back here in case it helped anyone.
Thank again for stopping by!

--
Cheers,
Philippe
https://philippecastagna.com
 
Very interesting. I'm still confused as to the practicality of loading everything vertically, in terms of accessibility and actual storage. Can you post pictures of the main compartment with camera and lenses in?

The 'problem' with the Hadley Pro, that I love, is that it is just too narrow to put my camera, Fuji X-T1, at right angles. It has to go in along the bags length, not its width as I'd prefer. It's 'narrowness' also prevents the camera going in 'lengthways' with the vertical grip fitted. This means I can't maximise my use of space in the bag. It's a minor inconvenience though, as all bags have compromises. With the rucksack I can't see how the space can be maximisedat all, as only one short divider and the bag is sooooo deep. Does that make sense? Real world photos would help. It's a GREAT looking bag though. Thanks for posting. :-)
Hi Optimus,

I'm a prime lens guy also so I'm really jealous of your nickname ;)
Thanks! It has so far been the only username I've wanted, that someone else hasn't chosen already.
Perfect choice ;)
I'm able to fit my canon 6D with the 135mm f/2L mounted on it (lens hood reversed) facing down, perfectly in the hadley Pro. I do not use grip but the 6D even it's the smallest full frame dslr, still remain pretty wide. But I have no issue at all with it.
If the Billingham pack is placed on its back are the dimensions sufficient that you'd say the X-T1 would fit lying with its 'side' lying on the back of the pack, or only if it was put in with its 'bottom' or 'top' lying on the back of the Billingham back pack.
With the bottom of of the camera lying on the back of the bag with the lens facing down.
I can imagine that with the grip, the xt1 could create a bulk. But without it, it should be perfect.

Also which lens are you using which is too long to allow you put your camera as I do?
No, not a long lens, that's my point. Having short primes / zooms the pack seems too long. You said there was only one narrow divider so you'd have to stack a number of primes etc in the same space, as you can't separate each one. I prefer the larger, faster primes, but the newer primes are even smaller making the likelihood of 'wasted space' more of a worry. I'm sure a 100-400 will fit fine, and that's the largest lens Fuji currently do.
You can use the small dividers of your Hadley Pro which gives you 3 in total. This should be enough hopefully...
On my site you can check the review that I made last year of the Hadley Pro if this can help.
I actually have one myself, hence my observation. It's lovely.
This is a fantastic bag for sure.
Regarding the Rucksack 35, will made a full review in the course of august which will have a lot of images with the equipment loaded.

I will post when it will be available.

Feel free to answer me here or in MP if you need more info.
I thought I'd post back here in case it helped anyone.
Great! it's what a community should be, share experience and passion!
 
Hi everybody,

if you are searching for a nice rucksack please check my brand new post about the Billingham Rucksack 35.

https://philippecastagna.com/2017/07/06/billingham-rucksack-35-first-impression/

Any feedback or question are welcome.
If you're looking for feedback on your article - well written, well documented, easy to see how the product works. Well done.

If you're wondering what people think of the bag, $399 for what that is - a back pack that has very little adjustment and carries very little is a bit steep. There are much better and more functional backpacks out there. I continue to muse over this brand as the price to function value proposition is way out of wack.
 
Hi everybody,

if you are searching for a nice rucksack please check my brand new post about the Billingham Rucksack 35.

https://philippecastagna.com/2017/07/06/billingham-rucksack-35-first-impression/

Any feedback or question are welcome.
If you're looking for feedback on your article - well written, well documented, easy to see how the product works. Well done.

If you're wondering what people think of the bag, $399 for what that is - a back pack that has very little adjustment and carries very little is a bit steep. There are much better and more functional backpacks out there. I continue to muse over this brand as the price to function value proposition is way out of wack.
Hi Steve (I assume ;) ),

Many thanks for your feedback and kind word on my blog post.

I really respect your point on Billingham and his position in the market vs the others brand. But judging by the specs on papers is not enough for me. For example I bought the Canon 6D almost 5 years ago when a lot of people was criticizing it due to his lack of specs on the paper versus, for example, his concurrent in Nikon. 5 years after, nobody talk about the D600/610 and a high amount of photographers, even professional, are using it and praising the qualities of the 6D whatever the lacks of specs it have.

As I wrote in my article, some design are good to have, like a pen holder for ex, but it is really a deal breaker if you don't have it? What I prefer in Billingham is the quality of their fabric, totally rainproof without any cover needed, the functionality and the easy of the access but with always the nice touch which will always preserve the security of what you have in your bag against shock, weather or eventual thief.

Their concept is beyond what anybody could need by using common sense from the experience of the past, but they are definitely modern in their approach.

I do not like to say negative things about anything or anybody but for example, I have a Lowepro protactic 350aw, which is really a fantastic product on paper by the specs. But in real it is full of details totally unpractical in real life. External pockets too small, even for a phone, need of cover for real rainproofing, weight on the high side which made it uncomfortable when loaded, and some others points... This list is too long for me.

To compare, my list of positive points is pretty high with Billingham. So yes, it is an expensive brand but with high quality fabric, leather and brass which made those bags build for life. The design is adapted. When you use a Billingham bag you know for sure that the people think about it. And this makes all the difference.

Do I'm paid by Billingham? unfortunately not ;) But I spent enough money in bags from the best brand in the market, I never looked back since I bought the Billingham Hadley Pro more than a year ago, since I test the Hadley One this year and now this little Rucksack 35 which really surprise me more and more everyday.

During the month of August, will publish a full review of it after using it for landscape photography, hikes and others type of conditions. Hope that you will read it also and that we will be able to share some point of view positively.

--
Cheers,
Philippe
https://philippecastagna.com
 
Last edited:
"the price to function value proposition is way out of wack."
You may be right. I spent what I thought was a lot of money for a Hadley Pro. Now I forget how much it was and just enjoy the quality. Rather like my Fujifilm lenses.
 
Hi everybody,

if you are searching for a nice rucksack please check my brand new post about the Billingham Rucksack 35.

https://philippecastagna.com/2017/07/06/billingham-rucksack-35-first-impression/

Any feedback or question are welcome.
If you're looking for feedback on your article - well written, well documented, easy to see how the product works. Well done.

If you're wondering what people think of the bag, $399 for what that is - a back pack that has very little adjustment and carries very little is a bit steep. There are much better and more functional backpacks out there. I continue to muse over this brand as the price to function value proposition is way out of wack.
Hi Steve (I assume ;) ),

Many thanks for your feedback and kind word on my blog post.

I really respect your point on Billingham and his position in the market vs the others brand. But judging by the specs on papers is not enough for me. For example I bought the Canon 6D almost 5 years ago when a lot of people was criticizing it due to his lack of specs on the paper versus, for example, his concurrent in Nikon. 5 years after, nobody talk about the D600/610 and a high amount of photographers, even professional, are using it and praising the qualities of the 6D whatever the lacks of specs it have.

As I wrote in my article, some design are good to have, like a pen holder for ex, but it is really a deal breaker if you don't have it? What I prefer in Billingham is the quality of their fabric, totally rainproof without any cover needed, the functionality and the easy of the access but with always the nice touch which will always preserve the security of what you have in your bag against shock, weather or eventual thief.
The problem with waterproof pack bags is that they get wet. So when you access them, your stuff gets wet. I've always preferred a rain cover so you can keep the rain of the pack itself.
Their concept is beyond what anybody could need by using common sense from the experience of the past, but they are definitely modern in their approach.

I do not like to say negative things about anything or anybody but for example, I have a Lowepro protactic 350aw, which is really a fantastic product on paper by the specs. But in real it is full of details totally unpractical in real life. External pockets too small, even for a phone, need of cover for real rainproofing
? It has a built in rain cover. External pockets - yea, they are small.
, weight on the high side which made it uncomfortable when loaded, and some others points... This list is too long for me.
I think there are some others that are more sensible. I was also thinking of a backpack backpack. You can buy nice inserts and make a regular pack into a photo pack. So I certainly agree that there are some packs out there that don't work so well.
To compare, my list of positive points is pretty high with Billingham. So yes, it is an expensive brand but with high quality fabric, leather and brass which made those bags build for life. The design is adapted. When you use a Billingham bag you know for sure that the people think about it. And this makes all the difference.

Do I'm paid by Billingham? unfortunately not ;) But I spent enough money in bags from the best brand in the market, I never looked back since I bought the Billingham Hadley Pro more than a year ago, since I test the Hadley One this year and now this little Rucksack 35 which really surprise me more and more everyday.

During the month of August, will publish a full review of it after using it for landscape photography, hikes and others type of conditions. Hope that you will read it also and that we will be able to share some point of view positively.
I will - you make good reviews.
 
Hi everybody,

if you are searching for a nice rucksack please check my brand new post about the Billingham Rucksack 35.

https://philippecastagna.com/2017/07/06/billingham-rucksack-35-first-impression/

Any feedback or question are welcome.
If you're looking for feedback on your article - well written, well documented, easy to see how the product works. Well done.

If you're wondering what people think of the bag, $399 for what that is - a back pack that has very little adjustment and carries very little is a bit steep. There are much better and more functional backpacks out there. I continue to muse over this brand as the price to function value proposition is way out of wack.
Hi Steve (I assume ;) ),

Many thanks for your feedback and kind word on my blog post.

I really respect your point on Billingham and his position in the market vs the others brand. But judging by the specs on papers is not enough for me. For example I bought the Canon 6D almost 5 years ago when a lot of people was criticizing it due to his lack of specs on the paper versus, for example, his concurrent in Nikon. 5 years after, nobody talk about the D600/610 and a high amount of photographers, even professional, are using it and praising the qualities of the 6D whatever the lacks of specs it have.

As I wrote in my article, some design are good to have, like a pen holder for ex, but it is really a deal breaker if you don't have it? What I prefer in Billingham is the quality of their fabric, totally rainproof without any cover needed, the functionality and the easy of the access but with always the nice touch which will always preserve the security of what you have in your bag against shock, weather or eventual thief.
The problem with waterproof pack bags is that they get wet. So when you access them, your stuff gets wet. I've always preferred a rain cover so you can keep the rain of the pack itself.
Their concept is beyond what anybody could need by using common sense from the experience of the past, but they are definitely modern in their approach.

I do not like to say negative things about anything or anybody but for example, I have a Lowepro protactic 350aw, which is really a fantastic product on paper by the specs. But in real it is full of details totally unpractical in real life. External pockets too small, even for a phone, need of cover for real rainproofing
? It has a built in rain cover. External pockets - yea, they are small.
, weight on the high side which made it uncomfortable when loaded, and some others points... This list is too long for me.
I think there are some others that are more sensible. I was also thinking of a backpack backpack. You can buy nice inserts and make a regular pack into a photo pack. So I certainly agree that there are some packs out there that don't work so well.
To compare, my list of positive points is pretty high with Billingham. So yes, it is an expensive brand but with high quality fabric, leather and brass which made those bags build for life. The design is adapted. When you use a Billingham bag you know for sure that the people think about it. And this makes all the difference.

Do I'm paid by Billingham? unfortunately not ;) But I spent enough money in bags from the best brand in the market, I never looked back since I bought the Billingham Hadley Pro more than a year ago, since I test the Hadley One this year and now this little Rucksack 35 which really surprise me more and more everyday.

During the month of August, will publish a full review of it after using it for landscape photography, hikes and others type of conditions. Hope that you will read it also and that we will be able to share some point of view positively.
I will - you make good reviews.
 
Hi everybody,

if you are searching for a nice rucksack please check my brand new post about the Billingham Rucksack 35.

https://philippecastagna.com/2017/07/06/billingham-rucksack-35-first-impression/

Any feedback or question are welcome.
If you're looking for feedback on your article - well written, well documented, easy to see how the product works. Well done.

If you're wondering what people think of the bag, $399 for what that is - a back pack that has very little adjustment and carries very little is a bit steep. There are much better and more functional backpacks out there. I continue to muse over this brand as the price to function value proposition is way out of wack.
Hi Steve (I assume ;) ),

Many thanks for your feedback and kind word on my blog post.

I really respect your point on Billingham and his position in the market vs the others brand. But judging by the specs on papers is not enough for me. For example I bought the Canon 6D almost 5 years ago when a lot of people was criticizing it due to his lack of specs on the paper versus, for example, his concurrent in Nikon. 5 years after, nobody talk about the D600/610 and a high amount of photographers, even professional, are using it and praising the qualities of the 6D whatever the lacks of specs it have.

As I wrote in my article, some design are good to have, like a pen holder for ex, but it is really a deal breaker if you don't have it? What I prefer in Billingham is the quality of their fabric, totally rainproof without any cover needed, the functionality and the easy of the access but with always the nice touch which will always preserve the security of what you have in your bag against shock, weather or eventual thief.
The problem with waterproof pack bags is that they get wet. So when you access them, your stuff gets wet. I've always preferred a rain cover so you can keep the rain of the pack itself.
Their concept is beyond what anybody could need by using common sense from the experience of the past, but they are definitely modern in their approach.

I do not like to say negative things about anything or anybody but for example, I have a Lowepro protactic 350aw, which is really a fantastic product on paper by the specs. But in real it is full of details totally unpractical in real life. External pockets too small, even for a phone, need of cover for real rainproofing
? It has a built in rain cover. External pockets - yea, they are small.
, weight on the high side which made it uncomfortable when loaded, and some others points... This list is too long for me.
I think there are some others that are more sensible. I was also thinking of a backpack backpack. You can buy nice inserts and make a regular pack into a photo pack. So I certainly agree that there are some packs out there that don't work so well.
To compare, my list of positive points is pretty high with Billingham. So yes, it is an expensive brand but with high quality fabric, leather and brass which made those bags build for life. The design is adapted. When you use a Billingham bag you know for sure that the people think about it. And this makes all the difference.

Do I'm paid by Billingham? unfortunately not ;) But I spent enough money in bags from the best brand in the market, I never looked back since I bought the Billingham Hadley Pro more than a year ago, since I test the Hadley One this year and now this little Rucksack 35 which really surprise me more and more everyday.

During the month of August, will publish a full review of it after using it for landscape photography, hikes and others type of conditions. Hope that you will read it also and that we will be able to share some point of view positively.
I will - you make good reviews.
 
Hi everybody,

if you are searching for a nice rucksack please check my brand new post about the Billingham Rucksack 35.

https://philippecastagna.com/2017/07/06/billingham-rucksack-35-first-impression/

Any feedback or question are welcome.
If you're looking for feedback on your article - well written, well documented, easy to see how the product works. Well done.

If you're wondering what people think of the bag, $399 for what that is - a back pack that has very little adjustment and carries very little is a bit steep. There are much better and more functional backpacks out there. I continue to muse over this brand as the price to function value proposition is way out of wack.
Hi Steve (I assume ;) ),

Many thanks for your feedback and kind word on my blog post.

I really respect your point on Billingham and his position in the market vs the others brand. But judging by the specs on papers is not enough for me. For example I bought the Canon 6D almost 5 years ago when a lot of people was criticizing it due to his lack of specs on the paper versus, for example, his concurrent in Nikon. 5 years after, nobody talk about the D600/610 and a high amount of photographers, even professional, are using it and praising the qualities of the 6D whatever the lacks of specs it have.

As I wrote in my article, some design are good to have, like a pen holder for ex, but it is really a deal breaker if you don't have it? What I prefer in Billingham is the quality of their fabric, totally rainproof without any cover needed, the functionality and the easy of the access but with always the nice touch which will always preserve the security of what you have in your bag against shock, weather or eventual thief.
The problem with waterproof pack bags is that they get wet. So when you access them, your stuff gets wet. I've always preferred a rain cover so you can keep the rain of the pack itself.
Their concept is beyond what anybody could need by using common sense from the experience of the past, but they are definitely modern in their approach.

I do not like to say negative things about anything or anybody but for example, I have a Lowepro protactic 350aw, which is really a fantastic product on paper by the specs. But in real it is full of details totally unpractical in real life. External pockets too small, even for a phone, need of cover for real rainproofing
? It has a built in rain cover. External pockets - yea, they are small.
, weight on the high side which made it uncomfortable when loaded, and some others points... This list is too long for me.
I think there are some others that are more sensible. I was also thinking of a backpack backpack. You can buy nice inserts and make a regular pack into a photo pack. So I certainly agree that there are some packs out there that don't work so well.
To compare, my list of positive points is pretty high with Billingham. So yes, it is an expensive brand but with high quality fabric, leather and brass which made those bags build for life. The design is adapted. When you use a Billingham bag you know for sure that the people think about it. And this makes all the difference.

Do I'm paid by Billingham? unfortunately not ;) But I spent enough money in bags from the best brand in the market, I never looked back since I bought the Billingham Hadley Pro more than a year ago, since I test the Hadley One this year and now this little Rucksack 35 which really surprise me more and more everyday.

During the month of August, will publish a full review of it after using it for landscape photography, hikes and others type of conditions. Hope that you will read it also and that we will be able to share some point of view positively.
I will - you make good reviews.
 
Hi Phillippe,

Thanks for sharing! I've been eyeing this rucksack for quite a while but there's not been many opinions on them online. I really enjoyed reading your post and also seeing all the pictures. I currently use the hadley digital in the same color as you. May try and buy this bag in the future for travel but I'm currently satisfied :)
Hi,

As promise please find here the full review.


Your feedback will be welcome!
 
It's a nice looking bag for sure...however, not much use to people hiking in warmer climates. Living in Arizona...I seldom leave on all-day hikes without (2) 2-liter bottles of water. Water in this case...is far more important than carrying extra gear. However, I'm sure many will make good use of this bag for shorter duration hikes.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top