Though many folks dislike the 7 series for the noise, I thoroughly
enjoyed using the 7hi. If the A1 photos are as good as the 7hi
-plus the new features--I would likely find it satisfying--except
for the higher price tag.
So, did you think the photos were 'worse' than the 7hi?
The Sony series was always sharper, but I never mastered either the
707 or 717 as I possibly should have. I am hoping for both cameras,
the A1 and the 828--but only because I think the 828 will be a bit
hefty for me in many situations.
I may not have the processing expertise to really analyze these
photos that is why I ask about the comparison of the A1 to the 7hi
vs the A1 to the idealization of the A1...
Make any sense to you? I , too, have a preorder--but have sold my 7Hi.
My concern is not that the A1 be the grandaddy of all prosumers,
but that it at least measure up to the photo quality of the 7Hi and
have the enhanced feature set.
Anyone have a comment on this last part?
Linda
He just doesn't have that kind of willpower.
Cameras... ANY cameras... make Greg weak in the knees. It's like
he's in a trance and walking toward the flame.
--
Ulysses
--
You know me too well. I am really thinking about cancelling at the
Minolta stuff. From what I see that Minolta Japan posted, that
would be about the best the A1 will be able to do. The unofficail
images had good and bad. The "AS" worked on the ball but the noise
was pretty bad on other images.
To me more nise than the 717, do YOU think the 828 will show any
improvement in best .jpeg mode?
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida