flashes to infant's eyes

Blix

Well-known member
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Consider this a ignorant stipid question but I can't help myself wondering.

Does too much flashing often hurts baby's eyes?

I take many pics of our baby indoors. I was wondering whether using flashes all the time in front of the eyes of a baby do any harm or something.

I'm worried.

Thanks
 
The manual for my Canon s400 says "Do not trigger the flash in close proximity to human or animal eyes. Exposure to the intense light produced by the flash may injure eyesight. In particular, remain at least one meter (39 inches) away from infants when using the flash."
 
Consider this a ignorant stipid question but I can't help myself
wondering.

Does too much flashing often hurts baby's eyes?
I take many pics of our baby indoors. I was wondering whether using
flashes all the time in front of the eyes of a baby do any harm or
something.

I'm worried.

Thanks
 
Here's another vote for bounce flash, you'll like the more natural looking lighting and don't have to burn out little junior's retinas....
 
I agree with another poster that you should check with your doctor for a better more accurate thought. However, just my thoughts are since they have much more sensitve blue eyes and regardless of color, they are so thin and not fully developed that it will likely bother them much more than an adult. I don't even like flashes in my face and I'm 33 years old.

I also thing that the natural look is much more appealing for a baby. Bounced flash or diffused flash will also look much better and more natural. Much more of a portrait vs a snapshot effect anyway.

Regards,

tim
Consider this a ignorant stipid question but I can't help myself
wondering.

Does too much flashing often hurts baby's eyes?
I take many pics of our baby indoors. I was wondering whether using
flashes all the time in front of the eyes of a baby do any harm or
something.

I'm worried.

Thanks
--
-tim

Canon 1 0 D, 24-70mm/f2.8 L-Series, 75-300mm/f4-5.6 IS, 35mm f2, Canon 4 2 0EX Speedlight
Sony 7 1 7, Nikon 9 9 5 & Konica KD-4 0 0 Z
Accessories....tons of course
http://www.pbase.com/pdqgp
 
4 of them left my aunt die of thurst in a hospital room a month ago.

When in doubt abstain. Bounce flash look better anyway.

--
Gaetan J.
 
With the level of paranoia in the states resulting in warnings about everything imaginable I can't help but believe that if even one infant was even possibly injured by a flash we'd not only see warnings but have a law against it. I think keeping a reasonable distance makes sense and I think a bounce makes better photos. I probably wouldn't get any closer than I'd want a flash going off in my face. Since I'm now half-deaf I worry more about the sound level of some of the music being played in homes.
 
american doctors wouldnt let that happen. they keep them living so they can keep robbing the insurance.

e
4 of them left my aunt die of thurst in a hospital room a month ago.

When in doubt abstain. Bounce flash look better anyway.

--
Gaetan J.
 
Thanks guys for your replies.

Call me dumb !#$% but what is bounce flash and how?

Anyone care to educate me?

Thanks
With the level of paranoia in the states resulting in warnings
about everything imaginable I can't help but believe that if even
one infant was even possibly injured by a flash we'd not only see
warnings but have a law against it. I think keeping a reasonable
distance makes sense and I think a bounce makes better photos. I
probably wouldn't get any closer than I'd want a flash going off in
my face. Since I'm now half-deaf I worry more about the sound level
of some of the music being played in homes.
 
1. All flash units are not created equal.

1a. If you have a very powerful flash then do not use it close to anybody let alone a baby.

2a. If you have a puny little built-in flash there is obviously less danger but use common sense. If it would bother you then it will bother the baby too. Flash durations are very short, but the eyes perceives the intensity as if it were steady output. ie. Flash always looks brighter than it really is.

2. As many suggested here, do not use direct flash. Use bounce or a diffused flash. Benefit - you get MUCH better looking photos.

3. Try to use diffuse natural light when you can.
Consider this a ignorant stipid question but I can't help myself
wondering.

Does too much flashing often hurts baby's eyes?
I take many pics of our baby indoors. I was wondering whether using
flashes all the time in front of the eyes of a baby do any harm or
something.

I'm worried.

Thanks
--
cheers!
Rick Stirling
 
Thanks guys for your replies.

Call me dumb !#$% but what is bounce flash and how?
"Too much light makes the baby go blind"

That was a catchy title for a play but it's a bit of an old wives tale.

Although there are real reasons for limiting exposure to light for premature infants, by the time a healthy baby is ready to meet the world, they can often expect to see cameras flashing them at a level that would surprise even Princess Grace.

The warning that came with your flash probably had more to do with the manufacturers own liability concerns than anything else. Still, you should let common sense be your guide. Keeping a respectable distance and using bounce flash will make it easier on the infant and get you better picturers to boot.

Bounce flash simply means tilting the flash head upwards rather than directly at the subject, letting the direct light from the flash "bounce" off of the (usually) white ceiling, diffusing it's output. This will soften the shadows and give a more "open sky" effect to the light from your flash making for a more natural looking photo (and a happier infant). Also TTL metering combined with a wide aperture will limit the output of the flash to the minumum level required for an exposure.

Excessive UV and Infrared are the two components of light from the flash that would be of concern. For IR to be an issue, the flash would have to be in very close proximity. Placing a standard flash so close is something you'd never do to anybody, let alone a defenseless infant! Some flash heads do a better job of filtering UV than others. Very extensive use of a flash that passes a lot of UV has some potential for risk.

I've spent a good amount of time over the years photographing the retina's of infants (and others) in my work using a retinal fundus camera. This type of camera uses a flash illuminator that is coaxial with the optics. This simply means that the flash is directed to shine directly out of the lens, rather than from the side. There is a fair amount of glass between the actual flash tube and final objective lens which eliminates any unsafe levels of UV, but the flash fires at up to 750 watt seconds (300 watt seconds being the norm). The lens is about 1 inch from the front surface of the eye and the effects of the flash are indeed quite dazzling.

Infants (and just about anybody else, including my self) find having this sort of procedure carried out on them to be a bit disagreeable, but it's not dangerous. Of course this the equipment used for this kind of photography is specialized and tested for safety and the procedure is carried out only when it's required for medical diagnostic purposes and isn't approached casually.

In short, infants are probably among the most photographed subjects in the world, and they have been since the days of glass plates and flash powder. As long as you use the flash on your camera as it was designed to be used, there's nothing to worry about.

--
Tom Young
http://www.pbase.com/tyoung/
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top