What one feature from another brand do you really want?

Lower price

I think in many ways the development of any camera/system is tied to a lot of factors so this makes for a fairly complicated answer. But perhaps lower prices, granted I tend to wait until a new model is introduced and buy the outgoing model unless the new one has features that I either can't live without or can be monetized.

Compactness

For example, I really like the small size and speed of the Nikon 1 system which is mirrorless allowing the cameras to be smaller. The 1" sensor also allows for a much smaller design, however some would sight the small sensor size as a liability. For me that depends on the application. Due to the smaller sensor size the size of lenses can be much smaller as well.

AF speed and FPS are also much faster than Canon's DSLR but as I said there are tradeoffs not the least of which is a system that for all intents and purposes is abandoned by Nikon.

Battery Pack consistency

Nothing more irritating then having to pack multiple chargers and battery packs for a road trip. One reason for dumping the EOS 1's in favour of 5D and 7D bodies in my kit.

CPS

I dropped my personal CPS account (member since the mid 80's) when Canon service started to seriously degrade and a yearly 'membership fee' was introduced. Was not getting good or even decent value for the fees charged granted the only part of the plan that was of use to us was the repair discount. Never needed the loaner gear. Last experience with Canon service was truly infuriating wanted to replace a sensor and wanted to charge more than the cost of the body that only required a cleaning under warranty.
 
Landscape/cityscape shooting is my favorite and 64 ISO is a significant part of why the D810 makes for such a nice landscape camera. I'm a bit surprised that more Canon shooters haven't mentioned this item as a desired addition to Canon's pro bodies.
The Pentax K1 using the sensor shift of the IBIS system puts four exposures together, effectively giving it ISO 25 at ISO 100.
 
Eye Af focus point selection, if it could be done 20 years ago it should be able to work flawlessly today.

and 4x3 ratio FF format. A format I prefer in many situations and it would give me a bigger sensor with no big design changes on todays FF bodies.
 
Landscape/cityscape shooting is my favorite and 64 ISO is a significant part of why the D810 makes for such a nice landscape camera. I'm a bit surprised that more Canon shooters haven't mentioned this item as a desired addition to Canon's pro bodies.
The Pentax K1 using the sensor shift of the IBIS system puts four exposures together, effectively giving it ISO 25 at ISO 100.
That's the way I think of the Olympus high resolution mode also. It obviously did not provide the detail for the number of megapixel equivalent claimed, but it did improve the image tonality substantially.
 
Eye Af focus point selection, if it could be done 20 years ago it should be able to work flawlessly today.

and 4x3 ratio FF format. A format I prefer in many situations and it would give me a bigger sensor with no big design changes on todays FF bodies.
And they could do it like Panasonic too, offering also a true 16:9 mode instead of just cropping- requires maybe an extra millimetre of sensor each side. The GH2 for instance does this.

Panasonic GH2 multi-aspect ratio sensor

Panasonic GH2 multi-aspect ratio sensor
 
Last edited:
Landscape/cityscape shooting is my favorite and 64 ISO is a significant part of why the D810 makes for such a nice landscape camera. I'm a bit surprised that more Canon shooters haven't mentioned this item as a desired addition to Canon's pro bodies.
The Pentax K1 using the sensor shift of the IBIS system puts four exposures together, effectively giving it ISO 25 at ISO 100.
That's the way I think of the Olympus high resolution mode also. It obviously did not provide the detail for the number of megapixel equivalent claimed, but it did improve the image tonality substantially.
Yes, but how effectively it will increase the detail will depend quite a bit on how sharp the lens is with Olympus' implementation.
 
I want my camera to appear on my wifi LAN. I want to go to a web page on a web server that the camera provides on said local wifi LAN within the context of a normal web browser, such as firefox or safari or whatever. I want to drag RAW and/'or JPEG files over from that web page to my desktop or to a folder and have them land right there, just as any other image or file on a web page will do.

Nothing more than that. Nothing less than that.

My 6D has a WiFi capability, but it sucks hard; it only does JPEG (which I never use), and it requires special software. Both are ridiculous limitations in this day and age, and furthermore, when the 6D was released.

I nurse a forlorn hope that (a) there will be a 6DmkII, and (b) that it will offer this capability.

I wouldn't mind a proper intervalometer, either. Wireless charging would be good.

This stuff's not rocket science. The cameras already have the radios; the rest... just requires a little bit of thought and competence on Canon's part.
 
I nurse a forlorn hope that (a) there will be a 6DmkII, and (b) that it will offer this capability.
A 6DII is as good as guaranteed, but that feature, likely not.
 
Eye Af focus point selection, if it could be done 20 years ago it should be able to work flawlessly today.

and 4x3 ratio FF format. A format I prefer in many situations and it would give me a bigger sensor with no big design changes on todays FF bodies.

--
http://www.guilbert.asia
Unlike sony mirrorless, canon bodies can't do flawless eye AF because the focus is not that precise. It focuses all over the place in a pretty wide spiral. So sometimes the eye will be in focus and sometimes not. (not talking about Liveview but through viewfinder).
 
I am too in-bedded with Canon lenses to worry about how greeen the grass is on the other side of the fence so I am largely ignorant of what features the other guys have. If Canon would just throw a full frame sensor into an 80D and call it a 6D2, I will have all I want for a while.
 
Dual shutter capability: mechanical and electronic shutter. I briefly had a Fuji X-E2 that had this and being able to shoot in silence was wonderful! Not that I used the maximum 1/32,000'th yet to bang through 7 fps allowed some pretty nice sequence captures. Now integrated into a Canon that uses CFast cards the write times could bring some very high capture rates.
 
Spot metering linked to the AF point, on bodies other than the 1D series.
 
I am too in-bedded with Canon lenses to worry about how greeen the grass is on the other side of the fence so I am largely ignorant of what features the other guys have. If Canon would just throw a full frame sensor into an 80D and call it a 6D2, I will have all I want for a while.
That and 4K video I hope. The 6D2 for me will be make or break. It will be the camera that makes me move to Sony or stay with Canon. For me to stay there has to be 4K. It is 2017 after all.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top