I said shallow DOF can be done with m43 but not as easy as with FF, but since you like to argue, you tried to make it sound like I said they can match, whitch of course the can't with some lenses.
...yes, it pretty much is my point that you cannot get as shallow of DoF with M43 as with 35mm sensors.
Since we are comparing advantages of platforms, it pretty much makes sense to point out the things that one platform can do, that the other cannot, and vice versa.
Yes, it does. IQ is not 100% dependant on sensor size. Lenses play a big role, what lenses are available, how fast they are, how good they are wide open, etc.
I'm sorry dude, but you are stretching it here. When making these kinds of comparisons, it makes sense to assume that as many variables as possible are equal.
Which is almost impossible. So the strech is actually to assume variables are equal.
It isn't impossible at all.
M43 and 35mm both have excellent quality lenses. No problem making that comparison.
Both have fast primes with excellent performance. No problem making that comparison.
If anything, the comparisons should be
less favorable to M43. It has a good lens lineup now, but it's not as extensive as Nikon or Canon.
Granted, you could do something like compare the finest M43 lenses to the crappiest 35mm you could find, but that's kind of... pathetic.
Also, check those milky way shots made hand held with the E-M1 II, then take a FF and try to match that.
You mean, the one shot with an f/0.95 lens?
The guy was also shooting at ISO 12800. Half that image is probably sensor noise.
And you do realize that's pretty much just a gimmick, to show how well IS works?
And that's just shows you're just troll.
<< rolleyes >>
Astrophotography is a complex discipline that depends on extensive testing and experience with sensors; compensating for conditions like light pollution, moonlight, and other factors; deciding whether to use ISO-invariant sensors, and more. It's very different than shooting a concert or an indoor sports event.
As to matching it? We can start with the Pentax K1. 36mp, IBIS, built-in Astrotracer, built-in LEDs for night operation, more DR than M43, tons of lenses.... Sure, you need a tripod. So would anyone who actually wants to do astro.
That guy is a camera geek who wanted to show off the IS of the E-M1 ii. The idea that it's showing off the low-light capabilities of M43 is absurd.
Very good points, very well explained and exactly on topic. Thumbs up !
