see how you resort to name-calling? like a little child, lol
It's not name-calling, I just call your name: TROLL
You have claimed, that Fujis R&D is weak,
yes, because of things like this:
fuji has at least *five* gfx lenses on the 2017 lens map:
http://fujifilm-x.com/gfx/
Did you even relize, that the GFX is new in the market? Of course they have to bring lenses in a shorter time, to make the system complete.
congrats on proving my point.
And if I thought it can't get any worse with osv, he proves that it was not the end of stupid comments. The whole world could tell you the sky is blue, and you would say "no, it's pink".
fuji is spending what little r&d capability that they have on the gfx... x-mount is the "red-headed stepchild", fuji can't even come up with a simple manual focus x-mount for their cine lenses.
So why did they just released the 50/2 lens, and come up with the 80mm in summer, if X-Mount is their red-headed stepchild? Why did they release 3 lenses in 2016, while the GFX was in development, when X-Mount is their red-headed stepchild? Why are 2 new lenses on their roadmap for 2018, when X-Mount is their red-headed stepchild?
The lens lineup for X-Mount is already pretty complete, so they don't have to come up with new lenses in the same speed as they did before. In fact, the 23/2, 35/ and 50/2 are lenses where they already got faster primes with the same FL for some time. It's a refinement of their lens lineup, what they do right now.
So you can't really claim that X-Mount is their red-headed stepchild, while Sony suddenly stopped the development for compact APS-C lenses, when the A7 series was announced. And since there are still huge gaps in Sonys APS-C lens-lineup they will probably never fill, the term "red-headed stepchild" fits on Sonys APS-C line really well.
now... maybe you like to come up with an excuse for why it took fuji until last year to come out with their first 24mp camera? tell us again how good fuji r&d is?
I just don't know why they came up with this later than others. Maybe it had to do with the manufacturer of the sensor (Sony), who wasn't able/willing to bring the X-Trans array on the 24mp sensors?
How long did it take, until Sony had a competitive lens lineup for their A7 cameras?
uh, gee, is that why fuji owners called sony aps-c a "red-headed stepchild"?
No, it's because they didn't released any new lenses for APS-C since the A7 series came out.
You should learn to understand what is written.
the facts are clearly stated above, YOU need to learn to understand.
Oh yes of course. You are like the people from the "Flat Earth Society", who will never accept that the earth is actually not flat. Or as I stated above, you claim the sky is pink, while ignoring the obvious.
Some people also like the smell of fresh cow dung.
yes, that's why they buy fuji.
You sound like a little child that realized that it's wrong. So funny to see lol
you claimed that sony is cow dung, then called me names... congrats on proving my point, again!
No, I didn't claim that sony is cow dung.
lying about it won't change what you said.
Are you really that stupid that you don't understand what is written?
"Some people also like the smell of fresh cow dung." speaks for itself.
Do you know what an analogy is? You cleary don't understand what is meant with this sentence. And you still ignore it when I explained it to you. On top of that, you didn't quote my Explanation, just to prove your point here. And you really complain that I call you a Troll?
name-calling again, like a little child...
Again, I just call your Name - it's not name-calling ;-)
The 80mm macro was always planed for 2017, it hasn't been delayed.
it's vaporware, that doesn't exist.
Troll
sony already has three e-mount macro lenses on the market, but fuji owners claim that x-mount has a better lens lineup, LMAO
Just to get the facts right: I said that Fuji has good lenses, what you wanted to deny because the 60mm macro has no limiter and is not 1:1. So you basically said that Fuji has no good lenses, because ONE lacks in some technical aspects, while still being great in IQ.
That's when I started to show you an example that there are also sony lenses that are not good, and according to your claim, the complete Sony lens lineup isn't good then.
Do you even realize how weird your argumentation is?
still name-calling, like a little child.
I just wanted to test, if you are able to understand if you want to. This example shows that you are. And it shows, that you just don't want to understand me correct, what proves that you are a troll.
Thanks for clarification!
