Many of the accomplishment that the sony a9 can do will still be basic for DSLR. These are baby steps in a relatively new technology. It's a small step for Sony, but a great step for mirrorless.
No doubt - just wanted to highlight that parallel running dogs at f/5 with 1-2 m DOF are no real challenge - and my 5D II was known for it's o.k.ish AF (to make it sound better than it was) ;-)
Many of the accomplishment that the sony a9 can do will still be basic for DSLR. These are baby steps in a relatively new technology. It's a small step for Sony, but a great step for mirrorless.
No doubt - just wanted to highlight that parallel running dogs at f/5 with 1-2 m DOF are no real challenge - and my 5D II was known for it's o.k.ish AF (to make it sound better than it was) ;-)
Absolutely agree. I want even see how it works with a 400 f2.8 and its DOF and with poor light. Good to see A9 works with good light and 200 f5 but sports takes place in a variety of places. Hope Sony keeps improving. I really enjoy my A7II but I can't give up my Nikkor 400 f2.8 yet.
couldn't agree more - there's an old saying - in the land of the blind the one eyed man is king - looks like the A9 could be more than the one eyed man - at least this test is promising and i hope we will get fast tele primes soon from Sony to see 300 or 400 f/2.8 in fast action at dimmer light samples!
This test proofs a capability that is easy to fulfill - I'd not be surprised to see my A7RM2 being able to do the same thing in the initial setup of 200 mm, f/5 and parallel running dogs - just no compare to an arbitrary sport like mercian Football in a dim stadium with ultra fast 300-500 mm tele primes.
The 400 f/2.8s are just monsters in performance in the right hands - I went for the 300 f/2.8 due to weight and size reasons.