Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It has more to do with any of the 16mp X-trans 2 cameras. Not x-trans 1 and 3. If you use the search engine you'll find enough threads about it to have to clear your schedule for the next week.
Basically it was over-aggressive noise reduction on the jpegs specifically, once you started to go higher in iso and with no option of switching it off. It did not affect Raw files.
The xt20 is x-trans 3 I believe so it shouldn't have that problem.
It has more to do with any of the 16mp X-trans 2 cameras. Not x-trans 1 and 3. If you use the search engine you'll find enough threads about it to have to clear your schedule for the next week.
Basically it was over-aggressive noise reduction on the jpegs specifically, once you started to go higher in iso and with no option of switching it off. It did not affect Raw files.
The xt20 is x-trans 3 I believe so it shouldn't have that problem.
It has more to do with any of the 16mp X-trans 2 cameras. Not x-trans 1 and 3. If you use the search engine you'll find enough threads about it to have to clear your schedule for the next week.
Basically it was over-aggressive noise reduction on the jpegs specifically, once you started to go higher in iso and with no option of switching it off. It did not affect Raw files.
The xt20 is x-trans 3 I believe so it shouldn't have that problem.
As I said before, for me it's the overall look and that overall look to me is not as natural as I was used to with my Olympus E-3 for example. To me it looks just a bit waxy. But I also know people who told me they prefered this look, because it doesn't show skin flaws as much. I will do my best to find some examples of both, but if you don't see it as I do, that's just fine. I just wanted to help the OP out with an example of what I see as waxy skin (although it's quite subtle at low iso settings).
www.archetypefotografie.nl
Well, it now 13 hours since the OP posted the question - strange no-one has yet provided a convincing sample despite all the fuss about this subject.Hi
I just got the xt20 and see a lot of reports on the forum and elsewhere about waxy jpeg.
Question - what does that look like? Is it Iso sensitive and does it appear in raw? Basically not sure what the fuss is about. Thanks
As a potential X-T2 or X-T20 buyer seeing this come up brought more curiosity. Pics of youthful types often skew my perceptions of skin smoothness. Their pores and lack of life/scars are almost ideal. Often I see that these lighter tones get blown to some extent by jpeg files, they seem very smooth. The Fuji term waxiness I could grasp. If using the film emulation this may also alter the contrast on such tones.
Would like to see more though maybe with males who often these days have that unshaved look then we get an idea of contrasting facial hair on skin.
You mean not convincing for you, I presume.Well, it now 13 hours since the OP posted the question - strange no-one has yet provided a convincing sample despite all the fuss about this subject.Hi
I just got the xt20 and see a lot of reports on the forum and elsewhere about waxy jpeg.
Question - what does that look like? Is it Iso sensitive and does it appear in raw? Basically not sure what the fuss is about. Thanks
Haha, my bad! ;-)Weird side note - I wonder how many times that poor kid's face has been overanalysed by complete strangers on the internet..
Nope - I meant convincing to the OP and other interested posters in this thread.....You mean not convincing for you, I presume.Well, it now 13 hours since the OP posted the question - strange no-one has yet provided a convincing sample despite all the fuss about this subject.Hi
I just got the xt20 and see a lot of reports on the forum and elsewhere about waxy jpeg.
Question - what does that look like? Is it Iso sensitive and does it appear in raw? Basically not sure what the fuss is about. Thanks
--
All good!Nope - I meant convincing to the OP and other interested posters in this thread.....You mean not convincing for you, I presume.Well, it now 13 hours since the OP posted the question - strange no-one has yet provided a convincing sample despite all the fuss about this subject.Hi
I just got the xt20 and see a lot of reports on the forum and elsewhere about waxy jpeg.
Question - what does that look like? Is it Iso sensitive and does it appear in raw? Basically not sure what the fuss is about. Thanks
--
You know, if you don't see it in this shot, you will be just fine and shouldn't have any worries for your portrait photography. Just keep noise reduction at -2 and use as low an iso as you can. I notice not a lot of people percieve the issue like I do.I agree. I saw nothing there but a good photo and a kid with smooth skin!This is a good example of why people were asking for examples because seeing the same image people see different things. What I see is an image of a young person with a smooth complexion, nothing waxy at all. You clearly perceive it differently.
Couple of samples from DPR's X-E2 reviewHi
I just got the xt20 and see a lot of reports on the forum and elsewhere about waxy jpeg.
Question - what does that look like? Is it Iso sensitive and does it appear in raw? Basically not sure what the fuss is about. Thanks
Lol. So trueWeird side note - I wonder how many times that poor kid's face has been overanalysed by complete strangers on the internet..
That does look odd. But haven't seen that with the xt20. Shooting up to Iso 6400, untouched sharpness, noise reduction to - 4Couple of samples from DPR's X-E2 reviewHi
I just got the xt20 and see a lot of reports on the forum and elsewhere about waxy jpeg.
Question - what does that look like? Is it Iso sensitive and does it appear in raw? Basically not sure what the fuss is about. Thanks
SOOC Jpeg ISO 6400:
https://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/2486086047/samples/HighISO/DSCF4735.jpeg
Raw conversion:
https://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/2486086047/samples/HighISO/DSCF4689.acr.jpeg