GK1545T-82TQD Series 1 Traveler Kit

Tekel

New member
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Just back from a couple of walks and the bag was feeling a bit heavy so thought I would look to see if I could drop some weight.

Looking at the Gitzo travel series, the GK1545T-82TQD looks to have a decent trade off between weight and maximum height. Given I am coming from a Manfrotto 055 Carbon Fibre 3 tripod and Manfrotto XPRO Magnesium Ball Head which both come in around 2.5kg total weight, the saving of 1kg look attractive.

Just wondering what peoples experiences are with the Gitzo ball head and the tripod generally? Actually looks like it might be an easier head to use. Price seems quite decent compared to the other models in the range.

I'd assume also with this set up, I would have no real need to keep the manfrotto system?
 
Just back from a couple of walks and the bag was feeling a bit heavy so thought I would look to see if I could drop some weight.

Looking at the Gitzo travel series, the GK1545T-82TQD looks to have a decent trade off between weight and maximum height. Given I am coming from a Manfrotto 055 Carbon Fibre 3 tripod and Manfrotto XPRO Magnesium Ball Head which both come in around 2.5kg total weight, the saving of 1kg look attractive.

Just wondering what peoples experiences are with the Gitzo ball head and the tripod generally? Actually looks like it might be an easier head to use. Price seems quite decent compared to the other models in the range.

I'd assume also with this set up, I would have no real need to keep the manfrotto system?
Tekel, the Gitzo 1545T while by no means cheap is the least expensive of three I tripods I own including a much larger Gitzo Traveler. However, the 1545T is what I use 90% of the time due to the light weight, excellent stability with even my Fuji medium format and big lenses, and over 60" height when needed. While Gitzo heads are also excellent, I wanted a ball head with adjustable tension and got an FLM CB-32 with an SRB-40 quick release. It's much lighter than the Gitzo and a bit cheaper but FLM heads are similar in quality and fits well on the 1545T tripod.

As for should you keep the Manfrotto tripod, I would until you are certain that the Gitzo is all you need. When conditions are less than ideal or on the occasion I am using a 300mm lens or longer, the light weight 1545T Gitzo tripod is not ideal and I use the big Gitzo with a RRS BH-55 ball head. Also, I am not a fan of Manfrotto heads and sold the one I had; just my 2c. Cheers/Gale
 
Last edited:
Just back from a couple of walks and the bag was feeling a bit heavy so thought I would look to see if I could drop some weight.

Looking at the Gitzo travel series, the GK1545T-82TQD looks to have a decent trade off between weight and maximum height. Given I am coming from a Manfrotto 055 Carbon Fibre 3 tripod and Manfrotto XPRO Magnesium Ball Head which both come in around 2.5kg total weight, the saving of 1kg look attractive.

Just wondering what peoples experiences are with the Gitzo ball head and the tripod generally? Actually looks like it might be an easier head to use. Price seems quite decent compared to the other models in the range.

I'd assume also with this set up, I would have no real need to keep the manfrotto system?
Tekel, the Gitzo 1545T while by no means cheap is the least expensive of three I tripods I own including a much larger Gitzo Traveler. However, the 1545T is what I use 90% of the time due to the light weight, excellent stability with even my Fuji medium format and big lenses, and over 60" height when needed. While Gitzo heads are also excellent, I wanted a ball head with adjustable tension and got an FLM CB-32 with an SRB-40 quick release. It's much lighter than the Gitzo and a bit cheaper but FLM heads are similar in quality and fits well on the 1545T tripod.

As for should you keep the Manfrotto tripod, I would until you are certain that the Gitzo is all you need. When conditions are less than ideal or on the occasion I am using a 300mm lens or longer, the light weight 1545T Gitzo tripod is not ideal and I use the big Gitzo with a RRS BH-55 ball head. Also, I am not a fan of Manfrotto heads and sold the one I had; just my 2c. Cheers/Gale
I'll echo recommending the FLM CB-32F with SRB-40 clamp, which I use on on my most compact tripod, the FLM CP26-Travel -- a tripod which folds slightly smaller than the Gitzo GT1545T (which at one point I considered getting, but chose the FLM instead) and I believe it is at least as solid as the 1545T, and less costly. I also have 2 larger FLM heads for my larger RRS and Gitzo tripods, and find the fit and finish, and performance, of all of these FLM products to be superb: smooth and precise.
 
Thanks all, got some options to look in to. Based on the last post, I could actually go all out FLM. I'll check the weights and look to make a decision.

What sort of levelling plate would fit that FLM set up?
 
That's a newer version of the GT1542T that I've found to be the best compromise between height, weight, size extended and collapsed. I also have an 055 that I use when not roaming far from the house or car, but the 1542T is used 90% of the time I need a tripod.

I had sworn off of Gitzo heads after using 2, once I tried a ReallyRightStuff head I have had no need to consider any other. I suppose I'd feel the same about a Markins, Arachtech, or Kirk head if I'd tried one of them first.

After 4-5 years with the GT1542T, I recently wanted something that packs a bit smaller, enter the 1555T. I've heard good things about the matching ball head, I thought I'd give it a try. Just over a month or so with it now, I like it. It disassembles for a thorough cleaning if it ever becomes necessary. Only time will tell whether it will endure well over time, but I want to believe this new design is well designed. [shrug]
 
Thanks all, got some options to look in to. Based on the last post, I could actually go all out FLM. I'll check the weights and look to make a decision.

What sort of levelling plate would fit that FLM set up?
FLM sells the LB-15 leveling base.


You may not need a separate leveling base, if you choose a ball-head that has a pano clamp, such as you see on this RRS ball head.


Here's another one from Photo Clam;


Then you have the "upside-down" pano- capability ball-heads, such as the AcraTech GP and Arca-Swiss P0 ballheads.
 
Thanks all, got some options to look in to. Based on the last post, I could actually go all out FLM. I'll check the weights and look to make a decision.

What sort of levelling plate would fit that FLM set up?
Not sure what you mean by "leveling plate"?

If you just mean a camera plate, which you attach to your camera body and then clamp in the ball head's clamp, any well-made original Arca-Swiss (AS) compatible plate will work, ranging from custom-made plates and L-brackets by companies such as Really Right Stuff, Hejnar, Kirk, &c, or generic plates ranging to the above-mentioned down to the many cheaper brands such as Sunwayfoto, Desmond, &c.

If you are looking for a "leveling base", which you mount to the tripod base and has its own built-in leveling mechanism and spirit level, just realize that this adds additional weight if you are going to mount your ball head on top of that, and will start making it not only overall heavier but more top-heavy. Also, the tripod mounting base is 53mm diameter, and the leveling base diameter should be less than that in order to be able to fold the legs over for minimum packing length -- plus, not sure how the legs would close over the upper part of that mechanism, nor exactly the clearance compromise that might make to the ball head knobs and clamp assembly with the legs folded.

Here is a link to the FLM Canada page, scroll down to find the CP-Travel tripod specs: http://www.flmcanada.com/carbon-fibre-tripods.html

Do a search in this forum for "FLM CP-Travel" or "CP26-Travel", and you will find some of my photos with the above tripod and head folded and in fully deployed positions.

The other comments I'll make here are these, regarding ones choice of tripods -- you may be aware of these already, having experience with a heavier-duty tripod, but I post for others interested in these details:

Tripods are primarily used for 4 basic reasons -- 1) for more accurately and smoothly positioning/ framing images; 2) convenience, ranging from just being able to park your camera setup between shots and near the positon subsequent shots will be made from, to mounting a gimbal with larger heavier telephoto lens to help track birds-in-flight &c; 3) stable support for longer exposures which cannot be easily achieved hand-held, and 4) rock-solid support for long time exposures/ time lapse/ HDR/ Hight Resolution shots.

Generally speaking, tripod stability can be better or worse according to many factors, all of which eventually add up to create a more stable or less stable system, which may or may not be improved upon by hanging extra weight from an apex hook or around the legs, or by shortening the legs: the basic leg material (and manner of layering, bonding for CF) along with wall thickness and tube diameter, leg joints (i.e. the tube connectors, and exactly how a twist lock is designed/ constructed, minimizing any possible "play" - and there are ranges of performance amongst different brands and models), same considerations for a column if present (ideal is to have a removable column for certain conditions), the apex material and design (even geometry such as leg angles permitted), and the leg/ apex hinges.

Also generally speaking, the higher the quality of the design and manufacturing, the more solid and stable, and resistance to vibration and better the vibration damping will be.

Finally, no matter if you have the highest quality of all components, the more leg joints and the thinner the leg sections, the more compromise there will be to the final result, so at the end of the day stability, portability, and cost -- in any comparisons, changing any of these will affect the others in some way.

The reason I say this, is that the price to pay for the FLM CP26-Travel is mainly the trade-off between stability and portability. This tripod is much more solid and stable than some similar Gitzo, Benro, and Sirui tripods which I have owned in the past -- I have done well with my larger tripods in terms of getting it right the first time, but no so with my most portable tripods. So, bottom line, this FLM travel tripod setup is the best by far of any of the other portables which I have owned, but still bear in mind that it is a compromise when compared to the heavier setups, albeit IMO one of the best compromises out there! And having said all that, this compact FLM tripod is now my most-used tripod, except for the most demanding situations such as high resolution, Astrophotography, and macro focus-stacking.
 
Thanks all, got some options to look in to. Based on the last post, I could actually go all out FLM. I'll check the weights and look to make a decision.

What sort of levelling plate would fit that FLM set up?
FLM sells the LB-15 leveling base.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/999177-REG/flm_12_60_901_lb_15_leveling_base.html

You may not need a separate leveling base, if you choose a ball-head that has a pano clamp, such as you see on this RRS ball head.


Here's another one from Photo Clam;

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/827544-REG/Photo_Clam_PCBH_PG2EPQR_Pro_Gold_II_Easy.html

Then you have the "upside-down" pano- capability ball-heads, such as the AcraTech GP and Arca-Swiss P0 ballheads.
Thanks for posting these, Bobby, good suggestions - I got distracted and then carried away writing too many details...😳
 
So you don't have to search, I've posted some photos of my FLM setup here:

Olympus EM5ii with Leica 100-400mm f/4-6.3, supported by FLM CB-32F ball head on FLM CP26-Travel tripod.
Olympus EM5ii with Leica 100-400mm f/4-6.3, supported by FLM CB-32F ball head on FLM CP26-Travel tripod.



Folded for travel:  FLM CP26-Travel legs, with FLM SRB-40 quick-release clamp.
Folded for travel: FLM CP26-Travel legs, with FLM SRB-40 quick-release clamp.



Closeup of folded FLM travel tripod with head/ clamp -- the 3rd leg is moved on its hinged out of the photo, in order to show the position of the clamp and head which allows to the unseen leg to fold down completely, as seen in the photo above.
Closeup of folded FLM travel tripod with head/ clamp -- the 3rd leg is moved on its hinged out of the photo, in order to show the position of the clamp and head which allows to the unseen leg to fold down completely, as seen in the photo above.





--
-Dennis W.
Austin, Texas
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top