Sony lens aperture function

theglassman

Member
Messages
33
Reaction score
7
Do all Sony E-mount lenses have a constant aperture once set to eg 2.8 or 5.6 during AF and live view?

DSLR's only close the aperture for the shot if i recall so fast glass is utilised for bright OVF and AF.

I take it mirrorless doesnt need this now for focussing in low light? I mean obviously you might want to shoot wide open in low light but is this the case now?
 
This should be posted as a sticky at the top of the forum.

Default behavior for E-mount is to set the lens to selected aperture immediately in M or A mode, and keep it there. In P or S mode, it will tend to stay open.

When focusing, if previously stopped down, the lens may open back up a bit to acquire focus, then it will stop back down again to meter, and maybe to fine-tune focus.

If Setting Effect is off, the lens will behave the same in A and M modes as it does in P and S modes - that is, it will stay wide open and open stop back down after focus is acquired.

All of the above is for AF-S, and with most E-mount lenses.

In AF-C, the lens will stay stopped down while the shutter button is held or half-pressed... so shot-to-shot focusing in continuous shooting is done stopped down. However, if the shutter button is released, focus acquisition the next time it is pressed is the same as in AF-S.

For a few lenses, like the 24-70GM, the lens stops down immediately even if setting effect is on. Sony has supposedly done this to mitigate focus shift issues seen with these lenses.

And, yes, for the most part, this is something that EVF/mirrorless cameras do differently than OVF cameras... light gain through the EVF makes composition and focusing wide open mostly unneccesary. Metering stopped down is more accurate, and composing stopped down allows continuous display of actual depth of field with no worries about focus shift when you take the shot.

The main complaint about this behavior that I have seen here is from people that shoot at small apertures in the studio, using lenses with the focus shift issues, and have a workflow where they keep the shutter button half-pressed (or BBF button pressed) and use AF-C to follow their subjects. It doesn't take as much light to track as it does to initially acquire focus, but, if your subject is moving around a lot, and the ambient light is low, it can be hard to keep a lot with the lens stopped down.
 
This should be posted as a sticky at the top of the forum.

Default behavior for E-mount is to set the lens to selected aperture immediately in M or A mode, and keep it there. In P or S mode, it will tend to stay open.

When focusing, if previously stopped down, the lens may open back up a bit to acquire focus, then it will stop back down again to meter, and maybe to fine-tune focus.

If Setting Effect is off, the lens will behave the same in A and M modes as it does in P and S modes - that is, it will stay wide open and open stop back down after focus is acquired.

All of the above is for AF-S, and with most E-mount lenses.

In AF-C, the lens will stay stopped down while the shutter button is held or half-pressed... so shot-to-shot focusing in continuous shooting is done stopped down. However, if the shutter button is released, focus acquisition the next time it is pressed is the same as in AF-S.

For a few lenses, like the 24-70GM, the lens stops down immediately even if setting effect is on. Sony has supposedly done this to mitigate focus shift issues seen with these lenses.

And, yes, for the most part, this is something that EVF/mirrorless cameras do differently than OVF cameras... light gain through the EVF makes composition and focusing wide open mostly unneccesary. Metering stopped down is more accurate, and composing stopped down allows continuous display of actual depth of field with no worries about focus shift when you take the shot.

The main complaint about this behavior that I have seen here is from people that shoot at small apertures in the studio, using lenses with the focus shift issues, and have a workflow where they keep the shutter button half-pressed (or BBF button pressed) and use AF-C to follow their subjects. It doesn't take as much light to track as it does to initially acquire focus, but, if your subject is moving around a lot, and the ambient light is low, it can be hard to keep a lot with the lens stopped down.
 
If a lens has focus shift, then focusing wide open may be faster, but it won't be more accurate.

The A7 series, at least on most native lenses, as I mentioned, does open the aperture back up for initial focus acquisition anyway. How much it opens back up seems to be ambient lighting dependent.

A big part of why SLTs and SLRs focus faster in low light is because their dedicated PDAF sensels are cross type and are much bigger than the ones embedded in mirrorless sensors.

Metering stopped down is more accurate, regardless.

--
A7-II with kit lens and a number of legacy lenses (mostly Canon FD); NEX-7 converted to IR.
 
Last edited:
If a lens has focus shift, then focusing wide open may be faster, but it won't be more accurate.

The A7 series, at least on most native lenses, as I mentioned, does open the aperture back up for initial focus acquisition anyway. How much it opens back up seems to be ambient lighting dependent.

A big part of why SLTs and SLRs focus faster in low light is because their dedicated PDAF sensels are cross type and are much bigger than the ones embedded in mirrorless sensors.

Metering stopped down is more accurate, regardless.
Metering stopped down is theoretically more accurate but not in practice. It is only true if there is enough light to work with and that's the problem. If this wasn't the case, there would be no need for the hybrid sometimes closing down and sometimes not behaviour of the emount lenses that you have already described.

The pdaf system, works better on mirror cameras not because of the size of the sensors but because the mirror can be used to make a wider reflection to the external sensors that measure the differences that are used to calculate focus. Think of it like on a rangefinder camera where the wider apart the two lenses are that are making the readings, the faster and more accurate will be the parallax difference readings that are used to do the focus. On a mirrorless camera, those points are embedded into the sensor and this makes the measurements considerably more difficult. But the on sensor technology is certainly improving.
 
If a lens has focus shift, then focusing wide open may be faster, but it won't be more accurate.

The A7 series, at least on most native lenses, as I mentioned, does open the aperture back up for initial focus acquisition anyway. How much it opens back up seems to be ambient lighting dependent.

A big part of why SLTs and SLRs focus faster in low light is because their dedicated PDAF sensels are cross type and are much bigger than the ones embedded in mirrorless sensors.

Metering stopped down is more accurate, regardless.
Metering stopped down is theoretically more accurate but not in practice. It is only true if there is enough light to work with and that's the problem. If this wasn't the case, there would be no need for the hybrid sometimes closing down and sometimes not behaviour of the emount lenses that you have already described.

The pdaf system, works better on mirror cameras not because of the size of the sensors but because the mirror can be used to make a wider reflection to the external sensors that measure the differences that are used to calculate focus. Think of it like on a rangefinder camera where the wider apart the two lenses are that are making the readings, the faster and more accurate will be the parallax difference readings that are used to do the focus. On a mirrorless camera, those points are embedded into the sensor and this makes the measurements considerably more difficult. But the on sensor technology is certainly improving.
 
If a lens has focus shift, then focusing wide open may be faster, but it won't be more accurate.

The A7 series, at least on most native lenses, as I mentioned, does open the aperture back up for initial focus acquisition anyway. How much it opens back up seems to be ambient lighting dependent.

A big part of why SLTs and SLRs focus faster in low light is because their dedicated PDAF sensels are cross type and are much bigger than the ones embedded in mirrorless sensors.

Metering stopped down is more accurate, regardless.
Metering stopped down is theoretically more accurate but not in practice. It is only true if there is enough light to work with and that's the problem. If this wasn't the case, there would be no need for the hybrid sometimes closing down and sometimes not behaviour of the emount lenses that you have already described.

The pdaf system, works better on mirror cameras not because of the size of the sensors but because the mirror can be used to make a wider reflection to the external sensors that measure the differences that are used to calculate focus. Think of it like on a rangefinder camera where the wider apart the two lenses are that are making the readings, the faster and more accurate will be the parallax difference readings that are used to do the focus. On a mirrorless camera, those points are embedded into the sensor and this makes the measurements considerably more difficult. But the on sensor technology is certainly improving.
 
I think there are a number of trade-off factors to consider about low light and particular aperture. The main reason PDAF is faster in general is because it knows which direction and how far a lens must move to be in focus, while CDAF only knows whether or not the image is in focus, and has to keep making small adjustments to see whether it gets better or worse.

The main trade-off, though, is still speed vs. accuracy. If you're a sports or wildlife photographer, there's a good chance you're shooting wide open anyway, so this whole argument about taking aperture or wide open is irrelevant. The argument becomes relevant when talking about shooting stopped down and still needing fast AF. That's not sports, and that's when the question comes up about whether you would really rather have fast AF or accurate AF.

I just ordered a new walk around zoom. I don't have a high budget, so, after much consideration between a used 24-70ZA and a Tamron 24-70/2.8, I decided on the latter. I'm waiting for it to arrive now, and realized after posting on this thread yesterday that I'm probably getting exactly what a few of the 24-70GM users say they want: wide open AF. I don't think I want it. This lens has a reputation for significant focus shift. I'm anxious to see how that pans out in reality when shooting at F4 or F5.6. I would much rather have somewhat slower AF that's accurate at the taking aperture, than something that's fast, but results in mid-aperture misfocus that cannot be corrected other than by switching to manual focus.
 
Interesting to note that adapted lenses on my A7rii ie my canon 85 1.2 on the MC-11 remain wide open stop down on shutter release.

I have noticed that aperture function is not always achieved after the first shot in a continuous sequence as i dont think the aperture function is relayed quick enough to open/close!

Also interesting to note that I've only just realised this after shooting the A7 series since it was released. When shooting Canon glass on the A7rii stopped down I certainly dont look for the actual dof achieved of my selected aperture.

Right now, I'm not sure how i feel about it.

Canon anyone point me to where Setting Effect is on the Menu??

Thanks
 
Interesting to note that adapted lenses on my A7rii ie my canon 85 1.2 on the MC-11 remain wide open stop down on shutter release.

I have noticed that aperture function is not always achieved after the first shot in a continuous sequence as i dont think the aperture function is relayed quick enough to open/close!

Also interesting to note that I've only just realised this after shooting the A7 series since it was released. When shooting Canon glass on the A7rii stopped down I certainly dont look for the actual dof achieved of my selected aperture.

Right now, I'm not sure how i feel about it.

Canon anyone point me to where Setting Effect is on the Menu??

Thanks
Well, this thread started as a discussion of native lens behavior...

Setting Effect is in the Gear menu - Live View Display. Page 3 on my A7II.

Do you have any lenses that support native features, like EyeAF, on your MC-11? If so, can you check whether those stop down to set aperture in A mode? Thanks.
 
Ah yes setting effect, i knew about that already. I have no reason to switch it off as i like to see my exposure.

I have no sigma lenses so dont think eye AF works without a Sigma lens.
 
The pdaf system, works better on mirror cameras not because of the size of the sensors but because the mirror can be used to make a wider reflection to the external sensors that measure the differences that are used to calculate focus.
The size of the AF sensors (and their linear dimensions in particular) do make a difference; the mirror does not make a wider reflection.
Here's a more technical explanation with diagram.

http://www.mattgrum.com/photo_se/af_diagram.png
The mirror in that illustration is not making a wider reflection.
The size and separation between the pair of AF sensors determines the accuracy of the AF measurement.
Yes. Larger/wider is better - if the lens can accommodate it.
However there is a trade off - the further apart they are, the wider the aperture must be in order to direct light to reach both sensors.
Yes again. That's why many cameras have PDAF sensors that are optimized for different apertures.

Also, dedicated PDAF allows for superior cross-type AF sensors while on-sensor PDAF (in Sony's current implementation) does not.
 
Last edited:
If a lens has focus shift, then focusing wide open may be faster, but it won't be more accurate.

The A7 series, at least on most native lenses, as I mentioned, does open the aperture back up for initial focus acquisition anyway. How much it opens back up seems to be ambient lighting dependent.

A big part of why SLTs and SLRs focus faster in low light is because their dedicated PDAF sensels are cross type and are much bigger than the ones embedded in mirrorless sensors.

Metering stopped down is more accurate, regardless.
Metering stopped down is theoretically more accurate but not in practice. It is only true if there is enough light to work with and that's the problem. If this wasn't the case, there would be no need for the hybrid sometimes closing down and sometimes not behaviour of the emount lenses that you have already described.

The pdaf system, works better on mirror cameras not because of the size of the sensors but because the mirror can be used to make a wider reflection to the external sensors that measure the differences that are used to calculate focus. Think of it like on a rangefinder camera where the wider apart the two lenses are that are making the readings, the faster and more accurate will be the parallax difference readings that are used to do the focus. On a mirrorless camera, those points are embedded into the sensor and this makes the measurements considerably more difficult. But the on sensor technology is certainly improving.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top