In the photo linked below. If you click on the image it should bring up a larger one.
http://www.mattreynoldsphotography.com/prints/osprey-nest
I tried to make the moon look as real as possible within the scene but this example still required 2 photos. On my shot for everything else the moon is over exposed and has no detail at all in the moon itself.
I took a separate moon photo at a faster shutter speed to expose it properly. Everything but the moon is black basically on that one.
You don't use bracketing, as the stop difference is much more than 3 stops or whatever one's typical bracket might be. Need to be a separate properly exposed for the moon highlight's shots, which likely means changing your metering mode to spot with the moon in the center for a light reading or just guessing based on some of the above suggested moon settings.
I then blended the two but to make it look natural compared to the lighthouse which has bright Christmas lights on it, I had to lighten the moon so much it almost looks blown out anyway!
I also had to then redirect some light or glow around the moon to give it a more natural look in the sky itself.
The moon was not completely full which makes it look not round in the final photo.
I could have gone for a large unrealistic moon for the scene, focal length like many of those "supermoon" shots are but wanted this to look completely natural.
Anyway sharing the image and work involved to give you an idea of what is involved. I am debating if I should just clone out the moon in the end as I am not sure if it ends up more of a distraction than adding to the picture.
--
online gallery at:
www.MattReynoldsPhotography.com