Reading mode: Light Dark

x-t20 with bricks

Go to last post
H

HSHN

Well-known member
Messages
127
Reaction score
124
Hey Folks,

Considering the size and weight of x-t20, do you think it would be comfortable to shoot handheld with 50-140 or 100-400? Assuming no grip attached;

x-t2: 507 gr

x-t1 : 440 gr

x-t20: 383 gr

I have seen many shots taken with x-t1 and bricks but still wanted to ask your opinions.

I don't like to use hand grip but I may get one if it is necessary.
 
I must confess I do not understand all of these questions about using large lenses with small camera bodies. I have a 100-400 and X-T2 and XA3. I would have no hesitation in using the 100-400 with the XA3 if the situation arose, simply hold the lens in my left hand and operate the camera with the right hand, works just fine. The tripod foot works great as a carry handle.
 
One has to always use 2 hands in this case

1 for the body

1 for the lens

However when holding the camera with wrist strap (and not neck strap) it's safer and easier with an external grip (like I do) when lugging all that mass around with 1 hand

Morale of story: i always add a grip to small body camera; besides it's Arca ready and can protect the camera in case of accident (they do happen , trust me )

Cheers,
 
I've only tried the 100-400 on an X-T20 in the store during a Fuji event a week before the camera's release. I expected it to be big, but wow, it's a lot heavier than I'd imagined. I think even with a grip you'd need to do all the weight supporting with your left hand under the lens and just use your right to steady/click the shutter. Doing it that way I'm not sure a grip is necessary. I want that lens eventually, but I have no plans to add a grip.
 
Holding a Nikon pro camera with a big lens like the 70-200 f.28 is definitely a two-handed job. However, it can be comfortable to rest your arm for a moment by letting your arm hang while holding the camera in one hand; the body and grip are big and so you can hold the camera/lens in one hand this way. With the X-T20 and 50-140mm f2.8, you can't really do that since the body has no real grip. Also, when two-handing the combination up to your face, the more weight you transfer to your camera hand the more the bottom edge of the camera body digs into your palm, unlike a big Nikon.

However, the 50-140mm Fuji has a very large zoom ring with lots of space between the ring and the body of the camera for your hand to rest. So the weight of the camera (just like on a big DSLR) and lens is primarily resting on the palm of the hand holding the lens. The Fuji lens is very ergonomic for this. The only problem I occasionally have is that I inadvertently nudge the aperture on the 50-150mm aperture ring (Nikon does not have an aperture ring on their 70-200).

I use the 50-140mm a lot on my X-T20 and I have no plans to get the grip or a wrist strap. The package is light enough to hold by the lens when one-handing it, and it won't cause a neck injury if slung to the side over the neck. I do use a monopod with this setup when I want to get video, and it works extremely well.

By the way, the quality of the 50-140mm on the X-T20 is outstanding; and the weight savings really adds up after carrying it around for an hour versus the Nikon DSLR and 70-200 equivalent.
 
Weight (lens) is supported by the left hand.

To prevent arm fatigue, I use a sling strap attached to the lens foot.
 
Last edited:
dv312 said:
One has to always use 2 hands in this case

1 for the body

1 for the lens

However when holding the camera with wrist strap (and not neck strap) it's safer and easier with an external grip (like I do) when lugging all that mass around with 1 hand

Morale of story: i always add a grip to small body camera; besides it's Arca ready and can protect the camera in case of accident (they do happen , trust me )

Cheers,
Click to expand...
May I ask which brand/model do you use and recommend? Obviously I should get one too. :-D
 
MHG-XT10 it fits both the XT10 and XT20

It's the only one on the market today , me think

Cheers,
 
DogShot said:
Holding a Nikon pro camera with a big lens like the 70-200 f.28 is definitely a two-handed job. However, it can be comfortable to rest your arm for a moment by letting your arm hang while holding the camera in one hand; the body and grip are big and so you can hold the camera/lens in one hand this way. With the X-T20 and 50-140mm f2.8, you can't really do that since the body has no real grip. Also, when two-handing the combination up to your face, the more weight you transfer to your camera hand the more the bottom edge of the camera body digs into your palm, unlike a big Nikon.

However, the 50-140mm Fuji has a very large zoom ring with lots of space between the ring and the body of the camera for your hand to rest. So the weight of the camera (just like on a big DSLR) and lens is primarily resting on the palm of the hand holding the lens. The Fuji lens is very ergonomic for this. The only problem I occasionally have is that I inadvertently nudge the aperture on the 50-150mm aperture ring (Nikon does not have an aperture ring on their 70-200).

I use the 50-140mm a lot on my X-T20 and I have no plans to get the grip or a wrist strap. The package is light enough to hold by the lens when one-handing it, and it won't cause a neck injury if slung to the side over the neck. I do use a monopod with this setup when I want to get video, and it works extremely well.

By the way, the quality of the 50-140mm on the X-T20 is outstanding; and the weight savings really adds up after carrying it around for an hour versus the Nikon DSLR and 70-200 equivalent.
Click to expand...
Thanks for sharing your experience, it is much appreciated.

considering the x-t20 and 50-140, do you think that it would be possible to do bif photography without any monopod or tripod?

I know 100-400 provides more reach but 50-140 is more useful for my usage and i can get an extender if i really need in future.
 
Derek49 said:
Macro said:
dv312 said:
MHG-XT10 it fits both the XT10 and XT20

It's the only one on the market today , me think
Click to expand...
One more... Metro Case MGXT10
Click to expand...
There's also this one:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B01CX9TWPY/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Using it with my X-T10/16-50, it gives a much better grip when carrying the camera. It's also less than third of the price of the MHG-XT10.
Click to expand...
I have both the eBay one and the fuji. For me the one in the link covers the xt10s grip to much and encroaches on the lens mount to much. The bonus is that it is a Lot bracket. The Fuji actually extends the grip but it is rediculously expensive for what it is. I was luck to get one used for less then half the original price.
 
I own the X-T2, X-T20, and the 50-140 and 100-400 lenses. I really don't see much difference in using the 50-140 or 100-400 on both the X-T2 and X-T20. Yes, using these lenses on the X-T2 is a little more comfortable, but of the balancing of the camera/lens weight is still done at the lens, no matter which camera is used. BTW, my son's high school baseball season is about to begin and I can't wait to shoot his games! My plan is to have both my X-T2 w/100-400 and X-T20 w/50-140 strapped over my shoulders! The "pro" DSLR shooters at the games will probably be envious of my beautiful Fuji mirrorless cameras! ;)
 
Last edited:
racin06 said:
I own the X-T2, X-T20, and the 50-140 and 100-400 lenses. I really don't see much difference in using the 50-140 or 100-400 on both the X-T2 and X-T20. Yes, using these lenses on the X-T2 is a little more comfortable, but of the balancing of the camera/lens weight is still done at the lens, no matter which camera is used. BTW, my son's high school baseball season is about to begin and I can't wait to shoot his games! My plan is to have both my X-T2 w/100-400 and X-T20 w/50-140 strapped over my shoulders! The "pro" DSLR shooters at the games will probably be envious of my beautiful Fuji mirrorless cameras! ;)
Click to expand...
Good luck to both you and your little fella :-)

Have you ever tried to shoot him before with x-t20 and 50-140 or 100-400 during the game? I mean handheld of course. :-)

If yes, how was your experience? I will be glad to hear.

Im just wondering if it is possible and/or comfortable to shoot fast moving subjects with x-t20 and bricks, without using any monopod or tripod.
 
Thanks. I just picked up the X-T20 so I have yet to shoot any sports. However, I have shot a few high school football and basketball games with my X-T2 w/50-140 and the experience has been very good. If you are interested:

Loading…

www.flickr.com

Loading…

www.flickr.com

Loading…

www.flickr.com

Loading…

www.flickr.com

I am anticipating the same results shooting sports with the X-T20...well, almost the same results. The X-T20 AF and burst modes isn't quite as good as the X-T2, but still will be very usable shooting sports, IMO.
 
I've been using my X-T20 for about 2 weeks, and I am starting to get used to the differences between it and my Nikon. No problems capturing critical moments with fast moving subjects using the 50-140, even in poor light.



6e62dc5cc20c40adb60dc8397ed0ee10.jpg
 
Hi DogShot,

Do you think is safe to mount the x-t20 on a tripod (camera mount not lens) and a 900 grams lens?

I adapted an old soligor 78-210 macro and this lens does not have a tripod mount, i am afraid i can damage the camera body with such weight...

Thanks,

Alex
 
The perception of how well large lenses and some bodies relate to each other relates more to the individual's sensibilities on that account. I'm one of the more fussier types in this regard, but I do like a lot how the 50-140 wields on an un-gripped X-T2 (or XP2).

--
...Bob, NYC
.
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Chief Dan George, Little Big Man
.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobtullis/
http://www.bobtullis.com
.
 
Last edited:
HSHN said:
Hey Folks,

Considering the size and weight of x-t20, do you think it would be comfortable to shoot handheld with 50-140 or 100-400? Assuming no grip attached;

x-t2: 507 gr

x-t1 : 440 gr

x-t20: 383 gr

I have seen many shots taken with x-t1 and bricks but still wanted to ask your opinions.

I don't like to use hand grip but I may get one if it is necessary.
Click to expand...
I will use either the 16-55 or 50-140 on my X-T20 along with my X-T2. You’ll be supporting the weight of the lenses with your left hand, but they work just fine. You will want to get the Meike handgrip (you’ll want to get it regardless of what lens you use). It doesn’t add much bulk, but transforms the handling. The big lenses are indeed better on the X-T2, but they also work great on the 20. I use the 16-55 on the T20 all the time if I’m just walking about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top