What's the most you would ever spend on a camera bag?

Why spend thousands on camera gear and then cheap out on the protection of it ?
Because it does the job and you dont need to break the bank just to have something to carry your gear around in.

It can be said the other way as well. Why spend more when yoj dknt have to?
You seem to have missed this part of the comment you were replying to:

"I did buy an Amazon Basics bag for about $25.00 Neither the material nor the build quality was comparable to the Lowepro."

Material & build quality were inferior. If YOU don't want spend the money, that's your choice but it doesn't mean your choice is right for everybody. If the $25 bag were truly as well mad as the Lowepro or another higher priced bag, everybody would be using it. But, that's not the case.
 
MIKE,

$450 for a bag? Wow. You do realize that bag costed no more than $12 to make right?
With a high end camera bag, you're paying for higher quality zippers, metal hardware on the strap as opposed to plastic, a fold away rain hood, etc, etc. There's a lot of labor content in manufacturing a fairly complex camera bag, especially when you have really thick fabrics, lots of padding and heavy zippers. I have a lot of respect for the Asian workers who do this work and never miss a stitch.

As far as value, you'll find those extremely expensive camera bags selling for a fraction of the original price once the model, or line, is discontinued. Yes, high end camera bags have a product cycles, oddly enough.
Alternately, find a used bag. People often go out and buy bags they don't like, then sell them for a fraction what they paid for them.
 
There are lots of good bags from Tamraq, Lowerpro etc exhibiting good materials and clever design at reasonable prices.

--
Save a life, become a stem-cell donor.
Hello to Jason Isaacs!
 
Last edited:
It's an unfair question. Every photographer has different quality and amount of gear that determines the size and amount of protection their camera bag needs to supply, which is obviously the reason why there is such a spread on camera bag prices.
 
It's just ridiculous some of the prices on these DSLR bags or 2 system bags whether they are slingbacks or backpacks.

$200? $300? $400? Even $500 and 600? Go on Amazon and you can find a generic house brand or the Amazon brand for a fraction of the cost. Like not half of the cost but more like 20-30% of the cost.

I just don't get it. These bags retailing for such high prices are overinflated. It's a camera bag, not a luggage. IMO you just pay for the look and brand name. No different than buying and wearing a $800 pair of jeans vs $15 ones from Winners. You pay for the elblem and to show off.
Then just buy a cheap one and don't worry that some people prefer the expensive ones. Choice is good isn't it?
 
It's just ridiculous some of the prices on these DSLR bags or 2 system bags whether they are slingbacks or backpacks.

$200? $300? $400? Even $500 and 600? Go on Amazon and you can find a generic house brand or the Amazon brand for a fraction of the cost. Like not half of the cost but more like 20-30% of the cost.

I just don't get it. These bags retailing for such high prices are overinflated. It's a camera bag, not a luggage. IMO you just pay for the look and brand name. No different than buying and wearing a $800 pair of jeans vs $15 ones from Winners. You pay for the elblem and to show off.
So a $1500 camera + $1000 lens = $2500

5% of that is $125.00

If I had a big rolling camera case with $10,000k worth of lenses and bodies, I would easily spend $500. You can extrapolate from there.
 
Last edited:
It all depends on what you want in it, if it was a $30 camera like the one you use then a carrier bag or a wooly sock would be fine. If you are carrying equipment valued in $100/1000s and earn a living from it or simply love it then buy what you feel will give it the best protection, it may cost $100 or $500 end of.
 
I've spent $100 or more, but normally buy in the $6-$50 range. I have quite a few bags, from large SLR storage cases to pocket camera belt pouches.

I don't need anything better than Lowepro / Ape Case / Vanguard.

I've inspected the more expensive brands but found they don't often don't have the desired features like zipper-closing main compartments, weather covers, and internal accessory pockets.
 
Camera bags unnecessarily waste too much space with all their bulky padding...OK if you are shipping your camera somewhere across country those overly padded camera bags may be useful, but for travelling in the city on outings or going to shoots, or even with me on a train or plane I just use an ordinary backpack that I use daily for books, papers, laptop, or whatever. To protect the camera though in the backpack I use a form-fitting dSLR case:

CS-36FBC__TL__x290.png


And lenses in pouches:

nr140916zuiko_07.jpg
When lenses used to come with fitted hard cases, I would have agreed with you. These days, it's hard to hind a decent lens case, and those cheap Chinese neoprene pouches frequently come with mold from long periods sitting in humid and dark shipping containers.
 
Camera bags unnecessarily waste too much space with all their bulky padding...OK if you are shipping your camera somewhere across country those overly padded camera bags may be useful, but for travelling in the city on outings or going to shoots, or even with me on a train or plane I just use an ordinary backpack that I use daily for books, papers, laptop, or whatever. To protect the camera though in the backpack I use a form-fitting dSLR case:

CS-36FBC__TL__x290.png


And lenses in pouches:

nr140916zuiko_07.jpg
When lenses used to come with fitted hard cases, I would have agreed with you. These days, it's hard to hind a decent lens case, and those cheap Chinese neoprene pouches frequently come with mold from long periods sitting in humid and dark shipping containers.
Actually it is very easy to find excellent lens cases. You just have to look at the right place and to pay a bit more.

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=sr_nr_...s+case&ie=UTF8&qid=1485201421&rnid=2528832011

Moti

--
http://www.musicalpix.com
 
Last edited:
That sounds about right if that's $US, maybe $35 US if it's really nice. Maybe $250 if it was made to my custom design. The main thing I want in a camera bag is that it must not look like a camera bag. Having a known camera bag maker brand on a bag just translates into all other languages as "I have so much money I blew hundreds on this bit of nylon, please rob me".
 
It all depends on what you want in it, if it was a $30 camera like the one you use then a carrier bag or a wooly sock would be fine. If you are carrying equipment valued in $100/1000s and earn a living from it or simply love it then buy what you feel will give it the best protection, it may cost $100 or $500 end of.
My latest bag was just over $300, but I've also used socks for my lenses, including my L telezoom. Long woolen socks are great for lenses when hiking with too much other outdoor gear.

And you've always got an emergency pair of socks :)

--
A camera is "investment" only if you make money with it
 
Last edited:
MIKE,

$450 for a bag? Wow. You do realize that bag costed no more than $12 to make right?
How did you come to that conclusion given that we don't know the bag in question ?

Or did you just make it up as you tend to do ?

BTW, I do know what an hyperbole is but you need to limit yourself to one per thread if you want folk to take you seriously.

Better still, only one for every 250 comments.
I was in Cape Cod last summer. Walked into a small leather shoppe, shoot breeze with the artist-proprietor. I asked how much he would charge me for a camera bag the size of my 39 year old Nikon camera bag I was tooting. I paid $120 for the bag in 1977. After inspecting my camera bag, the artist-proprietor itemized material and labor and quoted $800 plus chance. Naturally, I thought the price is too much for me to, hence, I did not bite.

I've seen a small Tumi camera bag for $300. My wife has an $800 Coach handbag. Based on that, $450 camera bag is not unrealistic.
 
Actually the bag I used in Vietnam last year was just about perfect. About US$ 18 from our equivalent of Walmart. It's not a camera bag. It's a padded hip bag. It has a strap for over the shoulder and another for round the waist. I wear it on the front of my left hip. Instant access, I can see it, I can ride a motorbike and not have it in the way of my pillion. To make it a camera bag I just glued in an extra couple of bits of padding and a divider. That bag held a Canon SL1, Tamron 18-270, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Fujifilm XP70 camera and wide angle "action lens", 3 spare batteries, spare cards, lens pen and cloth, mini tripod, with a side pocket left over for a small drink.
 
The most recent bag I bought was a Tamrac, $19.95, a Black Friday sale. The previous one, still in use is another Tamrac; I paid maybe $50-60 in a local store which closed a few years ago. That one has been to five continents and dozens of countries and tropical islands.
 
Last edited:
It's just ridiculous some of the prices on these DSLR bags or 2 system bags whether they are slingbacks or backpacks.

$200? $300? $400? Even $500 and 600? Go on Amazon and you can find a generic house brand or the Amazon brand for a fraction of the cost. Like not half of the cost but more like 20-30% of the cost.
Are the generic bags waterproof, sufficiently waterproof to protect your equipment if you get caught out in a downpour? Do they have adequate padding if you drop the bag with several thousand dollars of equipment inside? What is their design life - how long do you expect them to last? How comfortable are they are after you have been carrying one fully loaded for several hours?

If you are carrying $2500+ of camera gear which would you think protected your equipment better, a Lowepro bag for instance or a generic bag from China costing a fraction of the price?

If you have cheap equipment that you don't care much about, buy cheap bags. Don't complain if others of us take a different view.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top