Sharpness compared between Fuji and Nikon

baobob said:

If you want serioyus comparisonwhy not reading and playing the comp tool of DPR

Below are 2 crops when comparing XT2 with D7200 all with a 24 megapix sensor

The Fuji creates less noise and has a better JPEG engine but the sharpness is the same in the raw files





--
Good judgment comes from experience
Experience comes from bad judgment

Click to expand...

- 1976

Explore - 1976’s 689 photos on Flickr!

www.flickr.com

archetypefotografie.nl - Diese Website steht zum Verkauf! - Informationen zum Thema archetypefotografie.

Diese Website steht zum Verkauf! archetypefotografie.nl ist die beste Quelle für alle Informationen die Sie suchen. Von allgemeinen Themen bis hin zu speziellen Sachverhalten, finden Sie auf archetypefotografie.nl alles. Wir hoffen, dass Sie hier das Gesuchte finden!

www.archetypefotografie.nl

slimandy said:

So in summary, they're all very good.

Click to expand...

Vincent AF said:

Here is a non-scientific comparison to three different camera's: the Nikon D800, the Fujifilm X-T10 and the Nikon D5200. As you can see, the same lens and settings were used on all three of them. I couldn't nail the same focal point, but they are quite close. I'd love to hear what you guys think.

Click to expand...

Christof21 said:

Vincent AF said:

Here is a non-scientific comparison to three different camera's: the Nikon D800, the Fujifilm X-T10 and the Nikon D5200. As you can see, the same lens and settings were used on all three of them. I couldn't nail the same focal point, but they are quite close. I'd love to hear what you guys think.

Click to expand...

This thread seems to attract many cheaters... Not you to be honest.

It is amazing to see that many non newbies members continue to post unfair comparisons and to give wrong conclusions.

Click to expand...

Vincent AF said:

Christof21 said:

Vincent AF said:

Here is a non-scientific comparison to three different camera's: the Nikon D800, the Fujifilm X-T10 and the Nikon D5200. As you can see, the same lens and settings were used on all three of them. I couldn't nail the same focal point, but they are quite close. I'd love to hear what you guys think.

Click to expand...

This thread seems to attract many cheaters... Not you to be honest.

It is amazing to see that many non newbies members continue to post unfair comparisons and to give wrong conclusions.

Click to expand...

Could you elaborate? Do you mean conclusions in favor of a specific brand?

Click to expand...

Christof21 said:

Vincent AF said:

Christof21 said:

Vincent AF said:

Here is a non-scientific comparison to three different camera's: the Nikon D800, the Fujifilm X-T10 and the Nikon D5200. As you can see, the same lens and settings were used on all three of them. I couldn't nail the same focal point, but they are quite close. I'd love to hear what you guys think.

Click to expand...

This thread seems to attract many cheaters... Not you to be honest.

It is amazing to see that many non newbies members continue to post unfair comparisons and to give wrong conclusions.

Click to expand...

Could you elaborate? Do you mean conclusions in favor of a specific brand?

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

JS Burnie said:

So jpegs in the DPR image comparison tool should show different exposures at the same ISO? I don't see that. Not sure what the methodology is. Do they use same ISO and different shutter speed to achieve the same exposure?

Click to expand...

Vincent AF said:

Vincent AF wrote:
Because these aren't done with the same lens and these aren't real world samples.

Click to expand...