Camera upgrade recommendations - bird photography

oiseau2

New member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I currently use a mid-range bridge (cost c. £250 new 3 years ago) mostly to take pictures of birds, although I do use it for everyday pictures too. I bought it for the 30x optical zoom - which I love - but the photo quality is not what I want and I want to upgrade. It takes good photos in bright sunlight (even on max zoom) but even overcast weather will destroy the picture quality.

I am therefore looking for an upgrade (budget c. £400) to something with a similar zoom level but better picture quality. I'm not looking to win any wildlife photography awards, I'm just a hobbyist wanting nice crisp shots for my own collection rather than the grainy shots I currently get. I've been browsing sites but sometimes find it hard to understand what zoom level I'd be getting and how to anticipate what the picture quality would be - and find it's always best to take a recommendation from someone who has used a camera.

Does anybody have any recommendations?
 
Without knowing what camera you have now how can anybody recommend something better?
 
I currently use a mid-range bridge (cost c. £250 new 3 years ago) mostly to take pictures of birds, although I do use it for everyday pictures too. I bought it for the 30x optical zoom - which I love - but the photo quality is not what I want and I want to upgrade. It takes good photos in bright sunlight (even on max zoom) but even overcast weather will destroy the picture quality.

I am therefore looking for an upgrade (budget c. £400) to something with a similar zoom level but better picture quality. I'm not looking to win any wildlife photography awards, I'm just a hobbyist wanting nice crisp shots for my own collection rather than the grainy shots I currently get. I've been browsing sites but sometimes find it hard to understand what zoom level I'd be getting and how to anticipate what the picture quality would be - and find it's always best to take a recommendation from someone who has used a camera.

Does anybody have any recommendations?
First of all, please take a look at the buying guides for something that is both affordable and is able to do what you want:



Photography is full of compromises, and fortunately, besides cost, the trade-offs that you need to make are fairly understandable. Basically, the it seems that the problem you are seeing is due to not enough light being captured by the camera; as you wrote: "but even overcast weather will destroy the picture quality." Understand that the light levels on on a sunny day may be something like eight to sixteen times brighter than what you have on on overcast day, which is rather significant. Where I am right now, it is a dull, gray day, and the light level is no more than 1/12th the brightness of what it would be if it were clear.

So getting more light is an important factor for getting better quality photos on overcast days.

Some important considerations include:
  • Sensor efficiency. Newer sensors tend to have a higher 'quantum efficiency' than older ones, in that they convert more of the light into electricity when the shutter is open. While this data is hard to come by, higher efficiency can be had from newer Backside Illuminated (BSI) sensors. The one trade-off from this is that you can't get close to 100% efficiency, as a perfectly efficient sensor would not give you color images! There are some cameras — particularly those with small sensors — which have inferior color rendition because of their higher efficiency. So be sure to read the reviews.
  • Sensor size. A larger sensor can capture more light; for example, a DSLR may have a sensor size that is 10 to 16 times the size of a typical compact superzoom camera, which (all things being otherwise equal) would completely make up for the loss of light due to overcast lighting. However, larger sensor cameras tend to be larger and heavier, and may be more expensive. Also, lenses will be larger, heavier, and possibly more expensive. An excellent DSLR birding camera will have a huge lens!
  • Lens aperture width. Lenses are specified in terms of focal length and maximum aperture setting. The longer the focal length, the greater the 'reach' of the camera (or rather, the narrower the angle of view). A smaller aperture value means that the lens will let it more light: An f/2 lens will let in four times the amount of light as an f/4, and 16 times the amount of light as an f/8 lens. A lens with a relatively wider aperture (which is the same thing as smaller aperture value) will tend to be larger, heavier, and likely more expensive. But many lenses have optical defects when used at their widest aperture setting; also, you may have insufficient depth of field at wide apertures.
  • Longer shutter speeds. Some cameras or lenses have built-in shake reduction, allowing a longer shutter speed in lower lighting. But if your subject is moving, this may not be practical.
  • More light: some wildlife photography can use supplemental lighting, such as a remotely-triggered flash on a bird feeder.
 
400£ is not much. for that you can get a good used but good quality low end entry dslr or mirrorless apc-s and a telephoto lens since you like it. you may find good deals if you search for used ones.
that will give you a way much better quality than any bridge you can buy. it also gives you a much more flexible system with upgradability. the alternative is getting another bridge camera.
you can get a sony nex-6 with kit lens plus a 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS or something like that from samsung if you like mirrorless and having portability. since a dslr can be much bigger than a bridge.
you may also get a canon or nikon with kit lens and a superzoom or telephoto. like a D3200 or D3300.
but it's better that you tell us which bridge you have.
 
I'd look into the Panasonic FZ300 and FZ1000 first.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top