I ran into a snag despite watching so many videos coz none of them has addressed the issued how to batch and maintain same watermark size to different image size. Somehow they have conveniently avoid addressing the issue, I think.
Here’s my steps leading to a frustrated end result:
1) I took the initiative to batch image resize to 1600 width (landscape with ht varies slightly here and there due to cropping) at resolution set at say 180 (pic A) 2) I have a ready logo (which will be placed at 1/3 left from bottom) with a transparency set to same width at 1600 (pic B). The ht differs slightly but doesn’t really matter coz the transparency will auto centralise. The main procedure will be to “place” the transparency over the image during an “action”. Tested the action for one image and all seems well and good ready to batch with images of different sizes.
Now the batch result. I was taken aback to find the logo can be anyhow located, sometimes even just partially shown with the rest outside of image other than the specific location. The logo may be enlarged or shrinked in size. Than I discover the reason:
After batched resize, I checked the resized image resolution (pic C and D) and found the figure may change other than 180. Logo that were correctly placed was due to similar resolution between image and transparency. I discovered as long as the resolution differs, the logo can be anywhere and differ in size. I suspect the res differs due to different in ht but surely not all images will have the same ht right?
None of the video I seen seems to address batching different image size. Some replies I read under the video comments also face similar problem and were equally bewildered. The author never seems to revert to the replies.
Can anyone advise on a solution?
Tks
Ps. Pic C ht merely differs by 1 pixel and the res changed so drastically

A

B

C

D
Here’s my steps leading to a frustrated end result:
1) I took the initiative to batch image resize to 1600 width (landscape with ht varies slightly here and there due to cropping) at resolution set at say 180 (pic A) 2) I have a ready logo (which will be placed at 1/3 left from bottom) with a transparency set to same width at 1600 (pic B). The ht differs slightly but doesn’t really matter coz the transparency will auto centralise. The main procedure will be to “place” the transparency over the image during an “action”. Tested the action for one image and all seems well and good ready to batch with images of different sizes.
Now the batch result. I was taken aback to find the logo can be anyhow located, sometimes even just partially shown with the rest outside of image other than the specific location. The logo may be enlarged or shrinked in size. Than I discover the reason:
After batched resize, I checked the resized image resolution (pic C and D) and found the figure may change other than 180. Logo that were correctly placed was due to similar resolution between image and transparency. I discovered as long as the resolution differs, the logo can be anywhere and differ in size. I suspect the res differs due to different in ht but surely not all images will have the same ht right?
None of the video I seen seems to address batching different image size. Some replies I read under the video comments also face similar problem and were equally bewildered. The author never seems to revert to the replies.
Can anyone advise on a solution?
Tks
Ps. Pic C ht merely differs by 1 pixel and the res changed so drastically

A

B

C

D
Last edited:

