Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.pbase.com/image/20298998
I thought I was having problems before.......with the background
going soft...but now look at this!! The lovely model is in focus
while the water drops are out of focus!!!
I have more pictures with these sorts of problems on the way!!
Stay tuned!!!
JP
--
Click this if you dare!!
http://www.onemodelplace.com/member.cfm?P_ID=6108
----Would you believe it?? I think I have the same focus problem that
DavidP is barking about!!
Take a good look at this picture!! This proves it!!!!!!
http://www.pbase.com/image/20171804
Notice how the main subject is sharp but the background is
like....totally out of focus?!
I don't understand.....it must be the cråppy 300mm f2.8 L lens I
was using or something.....or the louzy 100iso setting.... I hate
what I see here.........aren't all pictures taken with the 10D
supose to be razor sharp from the subject to infinity no matter
what the setting is?! Isn't that what makes a good photo?? It is
an "Auto Focus" camera after all right??? Shouldn't it
automatically focus on everything???? I don't understand why Canon
made the Manual focus an option in the lenses for their auto focus
cameras......because if it says it is an auto focus camera, then it
should be able to focus on everything I look at through the camera
all at the same time....right??!!
Perhaps I should start taking pictures of rulers....or better
yet......I should take some action shots the dog sleeping in the
middle of the living room to learn how to take real professional
shots....with the camera set to P mode!!! like my buddy David P can
do!!!
.....and while you're at it....take a look at the pictures with the
same focus problem on the site link below!!
JP
--
Click this if you dare!!
http://www.onemodelplace.com/member.cfm?P_ID=6108
http://www.pbase.com/pixydust
10D + three black L lenses.
Only a fool would not realize that it was humor. LOLyou can negate all of the problems reported by the owners of some
10Ds by posting one in-focus photo (plus a link to your commercial
website, lets not forget) is so flawed that only a fool could
imagine it has any merit.
Yeah, that is a great mystery. ROTFLMAOI don't know why you think I give a fig about the 10D per se.
Yeah, it's so much easier to spout content-free generaities than to actually muster cogent arguments, isn't it? You must have graduated from the PearlRider school of forum posting.Talk about lamebrain responses...this one takes to cake.
http://www.pbase.com/image/20298998
I thought I was having problems before.......with the background
going soft...but now look at this!! The lovely model is in focus
while the water drops are out of focus!!!
I have more pictures with these sorts of problems on the way!!
Stay tuned!!!
JP
--
Click this if you dare!!
http://www.onemodelplace.com/member.cfm?P_ID=6108
At least that explains your posts.Yeah, it's so much easier to spout content-free generaities than to
actually muster cogent arguments, isn't it?
I alway though the photographer job is to compose and find the best angle for the photograph. I guess you're right that he was just there to take random picture and got one lucky shot.It is the photographer that takes the picture, not the lens.
----Would you believe it?? I think I have the same focus problem that
DavidP is barking about!!
Take a good look at this picture!! This proves it!!!!!!
http://www.pbase.com/image/20171804
Notice how the main subject is sharp but the background is
like....totally out of focus?!
I don't understand.....it must be the cråppy 300mm f2.8 L lens I
was using or something.....or the louzy 100iso setting.... I hate
what I see here.........aren't all pictures taken with the 10D
supose to be razor sharp from the subject to infinity no matter
what the setting is?! Isn't that what makes a good photo?? It is
an "Auto Focus" camera after all right??? Shouldn't it
automatically focus on everything???? I don't understand why Canon
made the Manual focus an option in the lenses for their auto focus
cameras......because if it says it is an auto focus camera, then it
should be able to focus on everything I look at through the camera
all at the same time....right??!!
Perhaps I should start taking pictures of rulers....or better
yet......I should take some action shots the dog sleeping in the
middle of the living room to learn how to take real professional
shots....with the camera set to P mode!!! like my buddy David P can
do!!!
.....and while you're at it....take a look at the pictures with the
same focus problem on the site link below!!
JP
--
Click this if you dare!!
http://www.onemodelplace.com/member.cfm?P_ID=6108
http://www.pbase.com/pixydust
10D + three black L lenses.
I take it English is not your first language. Your post makes absolutely no sense in regards to my statements.I alway though the photographer job is to compose and find the bestIt is the photographer that takes the picture, not the lens.
angle for the photograph. I guess you're right that he was just
there to take random picture and got one lucky shot.
Well, it's not really my fault if you can't tell the difference between my having a problem with the camera (which I don't) and having a problem with idiotic posts aimed at deflecting attention away fromt the fact that maybe, just maybe, some people have legitimate concerns about their particular samples of it.Yeah, that is a great mystery. ROTFLMAOI don't know why you think I give a fig about the 10D per se.
Brilliant. You're a software engineer. I can only assume your post is some subtle attempt at recursion. It's all very well you following me around and making trite little comments, but it doesn't really advance any kind of position does it? Or is your position simply that you like to stalk people and follow up to every one of their posts? (Oh no! Another PR technique that's spreading!)At least that explains your posts.Yeah, it's so much easier to spout content-free generaities than to
actually muster cogent arguments, isn't it?
Sorry, but it is you that is having diffirculties with comprehension. I am not sure how you can split hairs and say that you have concerns about the 10D issues being deflected and then go on to say that you have no interest in the camera? Nice try Pete, to bad the facts get in the way of a good argument.Well, it's not really my fault if you can't tell the differenceYeah, that is a great mystery. ROTFLMAOI don't know why you think I give a fig about the 10D per se.
between my having a problem with the camera (which I don't) and
having a problem with idiotic posts aimed at deflecting attention
away fromt the fact that maybe, just maybe, some people have
legitimate concerns about their particular samples of it.
Hmm, my turn to stalk. Well, with comments of that level of brilliance, I guess it's vital that we hang on to every word you write with breathless anticipation. I thought JP had set the bar pretty high with his original tour de force posting, but I can see he's just a comic (and intellectual) pygmy compared to you. Nice to see we have a worthy successor to Oscar Wilde at last. (Oblig. LOL)Back focusing? I don't think so. Quite clearly her front is in
focus, not her back! LOL
Before started this thread? Clearly we are having a language issue here. I guess we are both saying the same thing, it is the photog that takes the picture, not the lens.what I'm talking about before started this thread.
My position is that when I read absurd and/or ridiculous posts I make an attempt to point it out. This has nothing to do with you, it just so happens that most of your posts happen to be absurd and/or ridiculous.Brilliant. You're a software engineer. I can only assume your postAt least that explains your posts.Yeah, it's so much easier to spout content-free generaities than to
actually muster cogent arguments, isn't it?
is some subtle attempt at recursion. It's all very well you
following me around and making trite little comments, but it
doesn't really advance any kind of position does it? Or is your
position simply that you like to stalk people and follow up to
every one of their posts? (Oh no! Another PR technique that's
spreading!)
Um, quite simple. Replace the word "10D" with "D100" or "F707" or "Java inner classes" and if I saw the same amount of BS being spouted about those, then I would react in the same way. See what I mean? It's not the 10D that's the issue here, it's the ridiculous positions people take regarding it. I still don't see why that's so hard to understand.Sorry, but it is you that is having diffirculties with
comprehension. I am not sure how you can split hairs and say that
you have concerns about the 10D issues being deflected and then go
on to say that you have no interest in the camera? Nice try Pete,
to bad the facts get in the way of a good argument.
;.............That's a great point........that a LOT of people make.... I am often greeted by people who see my gear who say ...WOW!....LOOK at that....you must be a pro.... well.... I shoot for a living yes. and this is just a tool that I use to get the shot....and in most cases, it get's the job done.It is the photographer that takes the picture, not the lens.
------Would you believe it?? I think I have the same focus problem that
DavidP is barking about!!
Take a good look at this picture!! This proves it!!!!!!
http://www.pbase.com/image/20171804
Notice how the main subject is sharp but the background is
like....totally out of focus?!
I don't understand.....it must be the cråppy 300mm f2.8 L lens I
was using or something.....or the louzy 100iso setting.... I hate
what I see here.........aren't all pictures taken with the 10D
supose to be razor sharp from the subject to infinity no matter
what the setting is?! Isn't that what makes a good photo?? It is
an "Auto Focus" camera after all right??? Shouldn't it
automatically focus on everything???? I don't understand why Canon
made the Manual focus an option in the lenses for their auto focus
cameras......because if it says it is an auto focus camera, then it
should be able to focus on everything I look at through the camera
all at the same time....right??!!
Perhaps I should start taking pictures of rulers....or better
yet......I should take some action shots the dog sleeping in the
middle of the living room to learn how to take real professional
shots....with the camera set to P mode!!! like my buddy David P can
do!!!
.....and while you're at it....take a look at the pictures with the
same focus problem on the site link below!!
JP
--
Click this if you dare!!
http://www.onemodelplace.com/member.cfm?P_ID=6108
http://www.pbase.com/pixydust
10D + three black L lenses.
Well, at least you are honest. Anyway, we already know that you have no sense of humor whatsoever. As such you are qualification to judge any such attempts are without merit.Hmm, my turn to stalk.Back focusing? I don't think so. Quite clearly her front is in
focus, not her back! LOL
Yes, but you never point out why they're absurd and/or ridiculous. Maybe everyone but me can see it, but you should indulge me and give me some hints, you know, by actually referring to an absurd and/or ridiculous thing I've written and telling me what makes it so. How else am I ever going to stop writing absurd and/or ridiculous things otherwise?My position is that when I read absurd and/or ridiculous posts I
make an attempt to point it out. This has nothing to do with you,
it just so happens that most of your posts happen to be absurd
and/or ridiculous.
