User4202453296
Member
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 8
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree with most of this (granted I have no hummingbird images close to this quality), so note that I agree in terms of an aspiring wildlife photo-amateur-person.As an aspiring hummingbird photographer, and as one who bought the RX10iii in anticipation of a bird photo trip to Ecuador in a month, let me respond as if I had taken it.
Technically, spot on. The bird is sharp and so are the wings. Since the wing flap is not, as I see it, at the end of a flap and therefore moving slowly, I am impressed that 1/8000 shutter speed did the job.
Esthetically, I would not show this to fellow Auduboners unless I was desperate. There is nothing appealing about the setting (ugly feeder) and there is a strange reflection on the right (is that flare, or is there something out of focus over there?). Also, the bird is a female or really young male (Anna's?) so there no Zing! to the coloring. Stopping the wing blur is a plus (for most people) but color is the #1 goal. Activity other than feeding (fighting, catching a bug) is desirable too, but darn difficult to get.
Please don't take this personally, I would self-criticize exactly the same way.
And remember, getting good shots of hummingbirds will use billions of electrons before you get a National Geo image. Keep on trying!
Exactly!!!This is a nice capture. I dont think/hope people buy the RX10 to make it to National Geographic ☺
Here is an alternate take on it (minus the tongue)

What????This is a nice capture. I dont think/hope people buy the RX10 to make it to National Geographic ☺
OP: I'd be damn happy with that photo, as is, well done.Here is an alternate take on it (minus the tongue)
it's full size
--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
I'm not that good, ElliottOP: I'd be damn happy with that photo, as is, well done.Here is an alternate take on it (minus the tongue)
it's full size
--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
Bill: Suggested edit: leave the part of the feeder that looks like a flower, cut out the part below the flower, eliminate the big spot on the right side as you did.
Then, transform the plastic into a texture that looks like a real flower!!!
--
Elliott
Well Elliott you got to me again!OP: I'd be damn happy with that photo, as is, well done.Here is an alternate take on it (minus the tongue)
it's full size
--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
Bill: Suggested edit: leave the part of the feeder that looks like a flower, cut out the part below the flower, eliminate the big spot on the right side as you did.
Then, transform the plastic into a texture that looks like a real flower!!!
--
Elliott








Inpixio Photo Clip 7I wanted to do that but what program did you use I like what you did thanks buddy
As an aspiring hummingbird photographer, and as one who bought the RX10iii in anticipation of a bird photo trip to Ecuador in a month, let me respond as if I had taken it.
Technically, spot on. The bird is sharp and so are the wings. Since the wing flap is not, as I see it, at the end of a flap and therefore moving slowly, I am impressed that 1/8000 shutter speed did the job.
Esthetically, I would not show this to fellow Auduboners unless I was desperate. There is nothing appealing about the setting (ugly feeder) and there is a strange reflection on the right (is that flare, or is there something out of focus over there?). Also, the bird is a female or really young male (Anna's?) so there no Zing! to the coloring. Stopping the wing blur is a plus (for most people) but color is the #1 goal. Activity other than feeding (fighting, catching a bug) is desirable too, but darn difficult to get.
Please don't take this personally, I would self-criticize exactly the same way.
And remember, getting good shots of hummingbirds will use billions of electrons before you get a National Geo image. Keep on trying!