RX10 111

Messages
16
Reaction score
8
d8572ca665e844f19d5b1a4e0caebafb.jpg
 
How did you get this picture?
 
Pretty good :-)
 
As an aspiring hummingbird photographer, and as one who bought the RX10iii in anticipation of a bird photo trip to Ecuador in a month, let me respond as if I had taken it.

Technically, spot on. The bird is sharp and so are the wings. Since the wing flap is not, as I see it, at the end of a flap and therefore moving slowly, I am impressed that 1/8000 shutter speed did the job.

Esthetically, I would not show this to fellow Auduboners unless I was desperate. There is nothing appealing about the setting (ugly feeder) and there is a strange reflection on the right (is that flare, or is there something out of focus over there?). Also, the bird is a female or really young male (Anna's?) so there no Zing! to the coloring. Stopping the wing blur is a plus (for most people) but color is the #1 goal. Activity other than feeding (fighting, catching a bug) is desirable too, but darn difficult to get.

Please don't take this personally, I would self-criticize exactly the same way.

And remember, getting good shots of hummingbirds will use billions of electrons before you get a National Geo image. Keep on trying!
 
As an aspiring hummingbird photographer, and as one who bought the RX10iii in anticipation of a bird photo trip to Ecuador in a month, let me respond as if I had taken it.

Technically, spot on. The bird is sharp and so are the wings. Since the wing flap is not, as I see it, at the end of a flap and therefore moving slowly, I am impressed that 1/8000 shutter speed did the job.

Esthetically, I would not show this to fellow Auduboners unless I was desperate. There is nothing appealing about the setting (ugly feeder) and there is a strange reflection on the right (is that flare, or is there something out of focus over there?). Also, the bird is a female or really young male (Anna's?) so there no Zing! to the coloring. Stopping the wing blur is a plus (for most people) but color is the #1 goal. Activity other than feeding (fighting, catching a bug) is desirable too, but darn difficult to get.

Please don't take this personally, I would self-criticize exactly the same way.

And remember, getting good shots of hummingbirds will use billions of electrons before you get a National Geo image. Keep on trying!
Agree with most of this (granted I have no hummingbird images close to this quality), so note that I agree in terms of an aspiring wildlife photo-amateur-person.

I'm curious what settings you used on the 10 III for this image.
 
This is a nice capture. I dont think/hope people buy the RX10 to make it to National Geographic ☺
 
This is a nice capture. I dont think/hope people buy the RX10 to make it to National Geographic ☺
Exactly!!!
 
Last edited:
As it happens, the top review on Amazon for the RX10 Mkii was written by a photographer for National Geographic. Although the reviewer focuses mostly on the RX's video capabilities, it's pretty enthusiastic.

I'm surprised the noise is so low at ISO 6400 here. Possibly, that's because there's a lot of available light, and I'm usually attempting 6400 to get a night shot. In any event, nice work!
 
Although the image may not appeal to serious Audubon folks, I like it very much. The pose(if that is the right word for a hummer) is striking and very appealing. I think Bill's edit makes it that much better.

Chuck
 
Here is an alternate take on it (minus the tongue)

it's full size
it's full size

--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
OP: I'd be damn happy with that photo, as is, well done.

Bill: Suggested edit: leave the part of the feeder that looks like a flower, cut out the part below the flower, eliminate the big spot on the right side as you did.

Then, transform the plastic into a texture that looks like a real flower!!!

--
Elliott
 
Here is an alternate take on it (minus the tongue)

it's full size
it's full size

--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
OP: I'd be damn happy with that photo, as is, well done.

Bill: Suggested edit: leave the part of the feeder that looks like a flower, cut out the part below the flower, eliminate the big spot on the right side as you did.

Then, transform the plastic into a texture that looks like a real flower!!!

--
Elliott
I'm not that good, Elliott

although I guess I could add a real flower there....

--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
 
Here is an alternate take on it (minus the tongue)

it's full size
it's full size

--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
OP: I'd be damn happy with that photo, as is, well done.

Bill: Suggested edit: leave the part of the feeder that looks like a flower, cut out the part below the flower, eliminate the big spot on the right side as you did.

Then, transform the plastic into a texture that looks like a real flower!!!

--
Elliott
Well Elliott you got to me again!

fooled around some more!



full size
full size



1080
1080

1080
1080

1080
1080

1080
1080

1080
1080

1080
1080

Full Size
Full Size

--
"Life's Too Short to Worry about the BS!"
So I Pick my Battles
Click for Wild Man's Photos
 
Last edited:
Nice :) epic photoshop!
 
Must be Kidding. The photo is fantastic. I love the thoughtful technique.
As an aspiring hummingbird photographer, and as one who bought the RX10iii in anticipation of a bird photo trip to Ecuador in a month, let me respond as if I had taken it.

Technically, spot on. The bird is sharp and so are the wings. Since the wing flap is not, as I see it, at the end of a flap and therefore moving slowly, I am impressed that 1/8000 shutter speed did the job.

Esthetically, I would not show this to fellow Auduboners unless I was desperate. There is nothing appealing about the setting (ugly feeder) and there is a strange reflection on the right (is that flare, or is there something out of focus over there?). Also, the bird is a female or really young male (Anna's?) so there no Zing! to the coloring. Stopping the wing blur is a plus (for most people) but color is the #1 goal. Activity other than feeding (fighting, catching a bug) is desirable too, but darn difficult to get.

Please don't take this personally, I would self-criticize exactly the same way.

And remember, getting good shots of hummingbirds will use billions of electrons before you get a National Geo image. Keep on trying!
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top