Is the retailer or Nikon Inc. supposed to take the financial loss of having some fool buy a camera, shoot 500 pictures with it (still basically "new") and then decide they want to return it?
I sympathize with the retailer and Nikon here.
I think the onus is on the purchaser not to purchase and return items willy-nilly to begin with.
Perhaps the solution is to make the "restock" fee more punitive, or to not accept returns.
I sympathize with the retailer and Nikon here.
I think the onus is on the purchaser not to purchase and return items willy-nilly to begin with.
Perhaps the solution is to make the "restock" fee more punitive, or to not accept returns.