I am aware that you are frustrated with the work and learning curve for pp. Agreed it is a lot to ask that we make our images "perfect" in pp. Even the visual or technical duds ...
BUT "garbage in, garbage out" is still the answer to your question. If you see and find marvelous subject matter (can do so even in your own garage), your images will be much much better than if you have no knack for seeing. So the first worry always is to visualize excellent compositions, find subjects and angles, even if you run a portrait studio day in, day out, to catch the right light etc; then a bit of camera technique comes next, which parameters to set how, speed, ISO, aperture. And then, only then at the very end of the process comes pp. The last straw.
Therefore I am sure no any one software exists for 100 % satisfaction with pics that were not well conceived and well taken at their creation. And the well taken ones almost need no pp from my experience and work. They shine naturally.
You are, at least in your post, asking a question about trying to saddle a horse again from its rear. Old mistake of all of us, I am afraid to say.
Take better pics and your quest to make them perfect just in the end will vanish naturally.
