nikon 35mm 1.4g vs 35mm 1.8g FX Why no comparisons?

That's it for this. I'm outta this thread.

-m
I am out of this discussion as well - since we are obviously having different applications for an f/1.4 lens.

Just wanted to clarify one thing: You seem to think I am trashing your choice of the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 ART - and I am not. All I am saying is that I find the 1.4G series good enough for my needs (even with a high rez camera) - and I find the sharpness differences between 1.4g and 1.8g series not a lot if any. I have not tested the Sigma ART series (since I have already had the 1.4g that I saw no reason to sell as for my application they are working out fine). Please go back and check my posts - and check if you are overreacting.

I have already provided my final points (that I will summarize):

1. I think sharpness differences between the lenses like 1.4g/1.8g/pro zooms are overblown. That is my real world experience using the lenses I own and have owned & sold - and with some testing between them.

2. My application of the f/1.4 lenses are not landscapes but portraits - as for landscapes I find lenses like 14-24, 24-70, 70-200 plenty sharp for D8xx resolution stopped down appropriately. BTW I would only buy an f/1.4 lens if it has a good bokeh.
Ok, but if that's your attitude you might as well shoot with an AFD 35 F2 and be done with it. Seriously.

i could see the difference in sharpness between the 35 F1.4 and Sigma Art easily when I tried both and rejected the 35 F1.4. The 35 f1.8 is a lot closer to the Sigma
 
I have already provided my final points (that I will summarize):

1. I think sharpness differences between the lenses like 1.4g/1.8g/pro zooms are overblown. That is my real world experience using the lenses I own and have owned & sold - and with some testing between them.

2. My application of the f/1.4 lenses are not landscapes but portraits - as for landscapes I find lenses like 14-24, 24-70, 70-200 plenty sharp for D8xx resolution stopped down appropriately. BTW I would only buy an f/1.4 lens if it has a good bokeh.
Ok, but if that's your attitude you might as well shoot with an AFD 35 F2 and be done with it. Seriously.
I said modern designed lenses (in the series 1.4g/1.8g primes & the f2.8 & to some extent f4 zooms) - not all the lenses. About 35mm f/2 AF-D - I had used it for several years on a DX camera (first a D50 then D300) - it was quite soft but at the time there was no choice for the normal length. Then found the 35mm f/1.8 DX much better when it was introduced. But did not sell it till I got my first full frame camera (D3s) - there was a lot of vignetting wide open. Anyway it was not a great lens but just useable (if no choice) on DX & stopped down. Also the bokeh was not great at all. So it does not fall under the second point I mentioned - going for only the primes with a good bokeh.
i could see the difference in sharpness between the 35 F1.4 and Sigma Art easily when I tried both and rejected the 35 F1.4. The 35 f1.8 is a lot closer to the Sigma
I may pick up a 35 f/1.8 as a lightweight addition or a replacement of my 35mm f/1.4G.
 
Last edited:
35mm is my normal, and I have several for different purposes. I would like to find one in Nikon mount that draws like one of my all time favorites - my M mount Summicron ASPH. Which 35s have that kind of somewhat clinical look?
 
Heres an interesting comparison for IQ:


The 35 1.8g does not look sharper here.

I know most reviewers found out the opposite.
 
Heres an interesting comparison for IQ:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/...meraComp=614&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=3

The 35 1.8g does not look sharper here.

I know most reviewers found out the opposite.
I think this is instructive and doesn't contradict anotherMike's comments. This chart was shot at close distance (and the 35/1.8 sample looks a bit misfocused too), where AM among other people find the 1.8 less sharp. It's at landscape distance where the 1.8 comes into its own. LensRentals's optical bench test also bear this out (since it measures MTF at infinity):


Wide open the 35/1.8ED has significantly higher MTF than its 1.4 sibling at the center 8mm radius of the frame (about a 3rd of the area of the frame), and it's a tossup in the corners depending on which curves you look at.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top