sgoldswo
Veteran Member
Ok, but if that's your attitude you might as well shoot with an AFD 35 F2 and be done with it. Seriously.I am out of this discussion as well - since we are obviously having different applications for an f/1.4 lens.That's it for this. I'm outta this thread.
-m
Just wanted to clarify one thing: You seem to think I am trashing your choice of the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 ART - and I am not. All I am saying is that I find the 1.4G series good enough for my needs (even with a high rez camera) - and I find the sharpness differences between 1.4g and 1.8g series not a lot if any. I have not tested the Sigma ART series (since I have already had the 1.4g that I saw no reason to sell as for my application they are working out fine). Please go back and check my posts - and check if you are overreacting.
I have already provided my final points (that I will summarize):
1. I think sharpness differences between the lenses like 1.4g/1.8g/pro zooms are overblown. That is my real world experience using the lenses I own and have owned & sold - and with some testing between them.
2. My application of the f/1.4 lenses are not landscapes but portraits - as for landscapes I find lenses like 14-24, 24-70, 70-200 plenty sharp for D8xx resolution stopped down appropriately. BTW I would only buy an f/1.4 lens if it has a good bokeh.
i could see the difference in sharpness between the 35 F1.4 and Sigma Art easily when I tried both and rejected the 35 F1.4. The 35 f1.8 is a lot closer to the Sigma