E
eric
Guest
thats all good but has nothing to do with this peticular discussiond though.
I'm not sure what the advantage of a one time use digital camera
is? you can buy a disposable film camera for less than half that
cost, and the picture quality should be better - compared to a 2mp
camera. its sortof a neat idea i guess.. but i dont think it will
be profitable
digital has certian advantages that are negated in this situation:
instant feedback - you get to see your picture instantly and
delete / re shoot it if you arent happy w/ the results (impossible
with this camera since theres no lcd to review your pictures so you
dont know if they're good until you go to get them processed)
cost - w/ digital i can take as many pics. as i want and save them
to my hard drive, and the cost is practically nothing until i
actually print them, then my cost is that of the paper, in this
case, the cost of the camera will already cover the cost of a cheap
35mm one-time camera and cheap developing ( i think my local
walmart has one-hour for about $6 and a cheap one time camera for
about $4). w/ the one time digital, even if you just want
pictures on disk for say, email or website purposed i'd imagine
there would be a fee to save them to a cd-r. i think many photo
shops offer a medium resolution picture-on-disk option w/
developing at a reasonable price.
the only advantage i can think of, is perhaps a few minutes saved
in developing time. i've never had a situation where i didn't have
time to wait for one hour developing.. but w/ the digital i would
guess it'd take 10 minutes or so to get you 25 printouts and a cd
with your pictures.
however if you need your pictures that quick, a one-time polariod
is also an option (if they even still sell these?)
the only niche i can really see these filling well is for the
people that want to 'hack' the camera to get a $10.99 2 megapixel
digital