Skinfiner is my favorite skin retouching tool and is the fastest way I've ever known to smooth skin without losing texture. I'm very glad its new version now supports batch processing.
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
Skinfiner 2 now supports batch skin smoothing
- Thread starter fazapan
- Start date
A
asoftwind
Guest
Thanks for the pointer. I have the old version (1.4) which I like very much. The new version (2.0) is said to retain more skin details. Have you compared results obtained with both versions ? I'm trying to determine if I should upgrade. I don't need batch processing.
Claude
--
Claude
Last edited:
nand
Senior Member
From their webpage, Claude:
"Purchased users will get all major and minor updates for free without time limit".
So I did and it tell me that I a have the home license. So now I have version 2.0 instead of the 1.4 for free. Great.
Nand.
Last edited:
Hi Claude, because the upgrade is free, I just overinstalled it without comparing. I didn't feel there are any significant differences between these two versions. Maybe there are some minor improvements. But I found the smooth result without skin mask also quite well. Anyway, for me it's as good as before.
This is the result with smooth amount 65:
A
asoftwind
Guest
Thanks Nand. I had completely forgotten upgrades were free. I just downloaded the current version. Thanks again.
A
asoftwind
Guest
Thanks fazapan. I agree with you, at that price comparing the 2 versions is probably not worthwhile... ;-) Cheers.
Claude
--Hi Claude, because the upgrade is free, I just overinstalled it without comparing. I didn't feel there are any significant differences between these two versions. Maybe there are some minor improvements. But I found the smooth result without skin mask also quite well. Anyway, for me it's as good as before.
This is the result with smooth amount 65:
Claude
Last edited:
Toermalijn
Forum Pro
- Messages
- 17,446
- Solutions
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1,573
Comparable or better for the price? Or better price/performance ratio? What do you guys think?
Cariboou
Senior Member
Here the Original from Google
and here after Portrait Pro Studio 15
that may is too much processed, anyway will be interested other skin retouch programs like work, I will try of to do much better and post here and will see who is the best
ps. all done only in Portrait
Cheers
Cariboou!
--
http://caribooua.zenfolio.com/
and here after Portrait Pro Studio 15
that may is too much processed, anyway will be interested other skin retouch programs like work, I will try of to do much better and post here and will see who is the best
ps. all done only in Portrait
Cheers
Cariboou!
--
http://caribooua.zenfolio.com/
Last edited:
Luis Gabriel Photography
Senior Member
Portrait Studio is fantastic but its easy to get carried away as you can see by your example.Here the Original from Google
and here after Portrait Pro Studio 15
that may is too much processed, anyway will be interested other skin retouch programs like work, I will try of to do much better and post here and will see who is the best
ps. all done only in Portrait
Cheers
Cariboou!
--
http://caribooua.zenfolio.com/
As I have been using it more, I keep trying to make the enhancements more subtle (well each situation is different of course). The presets are pretty strong in my opinion so they work as a base to then start tuning things down a bit. At least that is how I have been using it mostly.
I normally take a while working on this but just wanted to provide a quick example
Attachments
Last edited:
nand
Senior Member
Not sure what the point is to show off Portrait Pro in a SkinFiner threat without showing the result done with SkinFiner. So here is one done in SkinFiner.
Done in SkinFiner.
Nand.
Done in SkinFiner.
Nand.
Here the Original from Google
and here after Portrait Pro Studio 15
that may is too much processed, anyway will be interested other skin retouch programs like work, I will try of to do much better and post here and will see who is the best
ps. all done only in Portrait
Cheers
Cariboou!
--
http://caribooua.zenfolio.com/
Pixel Poetry
Veteran Member
- Messages
- 6,369
- Solutions
- 3
- Reaction score
- 4,432
Luis Gabriel Photography
Senior Member
I'm sure do it manually can get the best result but also time consuming. For me, I don't like to retouch portraits too much, I just want them look healthier but still themselves. So I prefer those quick tools like Portraiture and Skinfiner.
Here is one in skinfiner, just with 5 seconds.
Here is one in skinfiner, just with 5 seconds.
Luis Gabriel Photography
Senior Member
I am seriously considering skinfiner as well now. Not as a replacement for Portrait Pro but from some testing, in some cases using it for skin only and PP for the other parts gives me a better result than with either one alone.
Can never have enough tools that help you speed up workflow.
Toermalijn
Forum Pro
- Messages
- 17,446
- Solutions
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1,573
[No message]
Cariboou
Senior Member
Hi,
This is why I post a picture worked in Portrait Pro Studio, in few second and not well because I like compare Skinfiner, Portrait and some other software, and may be why not buy something else
Regards
Cariboou!
This is why I post a picture worked in Portrait Pro Studio, in few second and not well because I like compare Skinfiner, Portrait and some other software, and may be why not buy something else
Regards
Cariboou!
Toermalijn
Forum Pro
- Messages
- 17,446
- Solutions
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1,573
OK, thanks. So i take it that you like those two best? Out of those two wich one you like best, if you were to pick one?
Cariboou
Senior Member
Your surely not the mine
Cariboou!
Cariboou!
Allen Gerdes
Veteran Member
When it comes to portraits, I prefer doing the work manually. Not that I have anything against plugins, especially for speeding up workflow, bu I just enjoy manually retouching portraits. Here is my result with the image posted below:
Regards....Allen
Regards....Allen
Similar threads
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum