baseball - fun shoot

gidgetto

Well-known member
Messages
141
Reaction score
184
Hi all, I am a hobbyist and have found that I really enjoy shooting sports. I took some pictures of a local HS baseball game today, and was hoping for some advice on improving my shots, although I'll take a compliment too LOL.

c5774dc787194f8c863c82f48d125e06.jpg



6fdd70409a09434fa330da9f61db9086.jpg



a3d2940ff2c0498ab0ce52880ba73bbe.jpg



579e7144cfbf4a44b785b1bfff679bbb.jpg



3dc94c25509141feb71abfebdf057b7f.jpg



54da95473f694855918327db67f04271.jpg



e715a7a6207143b59fbcc10ecd599de9.jpg



d3a0910e387746c686766f899a7088a7.jpg



d65e64754b9c479ea5e1d61b38b130ff.jpg



98281ec5bc7f478596164f047f292bb0.jpg



15dfcca196f44adeaa1a9e799de67e30.jpg



ed9b2a515c2c486aaf90df49bdddec67.jpg
 
....
Different strokes for different folks. In general I find shots of ball at plate very boring. It's like taking shots of free throws at basketball or serves in volleyball. It's cool to get that first bat-on-ball shot but quite honestly when you have hundreds of opportunities, it's really not that skillful to come away with some and images like the one above just aren't compelling storytelling. I mean, when was the last time you saw bat-on-ball or just ball over plate shots in SI or any major sports page? Spend less time taking shots of the pitch and try to capture the real action in the field/bases.
Myself, I am going to take as many shots as I can and see if I can get the ball in an interesting spot. It takes me very little time in LR to scroll thru the thumbnails and pick the keepers.
The subject isn't a pitched ball. That's boring. Hundreds of pitches a game. Try to get the ball in the field - THOSE are interesting shots. I think you may take so many shots because you keep trying to freeze a pitch. Just for an exercise, spend an entire game not shooting the pitcher or batters and only trying to capture action in the field. I think you may find you end up with more compelling images when you concentrate on that.
That being said everyone has their own way of shooting. I was just relaying to the OP mine.
+1 what John_A_G wrote. The first thing every new baseball player shoots are pitching and batting, and marvels at the first few ball-on-bat shots, then maybe the first-base catch. All because there are SO MANY of them during the game.

But they become boring quickly, and start out boring to people just looking at your photos. Stationing yourself and waiting for the infield play, the steal to second (also fairly common), a run-back slide into first (fairly common but not frequently shot), and home plate plays means sometimes you get almost (or literally) none during a game, but when you get them, they are really special, and show others a moment in time that is tough to see from the stands.

This has been emphasized to me the last two weeks as I have been shooting for cards. That means shooting every player in some action, and the club wants a lot of them batting, batting follow through, batting-to-running transition. And each pitcher in many different positions. Know how many pitchers a team has? I don't, I've lost count, it is a bit like ground hog day. I'm two weeks in and still have at least one more to get.

And concentrating on this means I've missed lots of good action shots from being in the wrong place (like behind home with a 400 on the pitcher when there's a home-plate play and I can just barely get the runners shoe in the frame).

Watch the infield. Look for fielding, throwing, and in particular any base slides. If you are shooting the batter, you may miss the runner stealing second who is much more interesting.

And look for player interactions, high fives, butt bumps on a win, or just goofing off in the dugout if you have access. There's more going on in baseball off the field than on, frequently.

--
Comments welcomed on photos: http://www.captivephotons.com
I guess this kinda shot....with a nervous ump! :-D



20dc20fb704949dd82e53b062537679c.jpg
 
Here are a couple from a recent game I shot.
Don,

you need to get a lot tighter on your shots. The only real subject of interest here is the batter/ball and they fill up such a tiny portion of the frame. Sometimes the ump or background is part of the story, but usually not. Not in this case. You really want the subject of the photo to fill the frame. Typically with batters at the plate you want to be able to crop down to just torso & ball.

Now, framing tighter is difficult. You need longer lenses and good positioning and it makes it tougher because you can't see what's happening away from the subject in the camera frame in order to time. So, you need to learn to shoot with both eyes open - or because action at the plate is predictable location, you can pre-focus and don't even need to look through the frame to take the photo (much easier with a monopod than without). Multiple different techniques, but the advice is the end result photo needs to be much, much tighter.
John,

Thanks for your feedback. These two shots were to help illustrate the need for a faster shutter speed.
 
It is a great start for sure. Since it's not film shoot shoot and shoot more. It's free! I'll shoot 1500 or so at each high school game.
OK - I'm going to disagree with this advice. If you're shooting 1500 shots you're wasting your time. You then spend way too much time culling out the 1400 bad shots.

A big part of getting better is PLANNING instead of just reacting. Baseball needs to be shot from different positions. From a given shooting position, there are only so many types of images that will work in the end. Don't try to waste your time shooting the images that get tossed because the action took place at the wrong angle/position for your shooting position and focal length. If you've got a good sequence of the pitcher, why waste 300 more shots of the same pitcher during windup/delivery? I absolutely agree that you should shoot full fps - but if you're taking more than a 3 or 4 shot burst then you need much more work on your timing. Trust me, working on understanding what types of shots work from which shooting position and working on your timing and shot selection you'll start the PP process in a much better place. 300-400 shots is more than plenty.
Here is a shot I took yesterday. To view and see the detail of the full image click on gallery page and then under the photo click on original size.

Actually I will have to disagree with you. If the pitcher is throwing at 90 mph, the ball is traveling at 132 feet per second. If the OP has a camera that is shooting at 8 frames per second the ball travels 16 ft for each frame taken. That's why if I am shooting continuous high many times the balls missing totally.
Different strokes for different folks. In general I find shots of ball at plate very boring. It's like taking shots of free throws at basketball or serves in volleyball. It's cool to get that first bat-on-ball shot but quite honestly when you have hundreds of opportunities, it's really not that skillful to come away with some and images like the one above just aren't compelling storytelling. I mean, when was the last time you saw bat-on-ball or just ball over plate shots in SI or any major sports page? Spend less time taking shots of the pitch and try to capture the real action in the field/bases.
Myself, I am going to take as many shots as I can and see if I can get the ball in an interesting spot. It takes me very little time in LR to scroll thru the thumbnails and pick the keepers.
The subject isn't a pitched ball. That's boring. Hundreds of pitches a game. Try to get the ball in the field - THOSE are interesting shots. I think you may take so many shots because you keep trying to freeze a pitch. Just for an exercise, spend an entire game not shooting the pitcher or batters and only trying to capture action in the field. I think you may find you end up with more compelling images when you concentrate on that.
That being said everyone has their own way of shooting. I was just relaying to the OP mine.

Cheers.
Well I try to get a mix not just batters and pitches....Cheers



Nervous Umpire
Nervous Umpire



24240b546d6c480d8e49dbc4a304de5c.jpg



2bb32f7c5c10456ab4f4b4f10eb38be6.jpg



 The eyes tell all...
The eyes tell all...
 
Great Thread ... Love this time of year -- first three weeks of April are baseball heaven if you shoot for an MiLB club. Demand for images – cards, programs, video displays, web sites and for publications is at an annual peak. I would add a few more thoughts to the already great information here:

THE EYES HAVE IT: 99% of the time I cannot/will not submit a baseball photo where the viewer can’t make easy eye contact with the player. I need to fill 80%+ of that frame with the player(s) and I need to see some eyeballs.

HAVE A GAME PLAN. Baseball is a long season and even in little league there are enough games where you can plan your approach. Ground ball pitcher? Shoot infielders that day. Fly ball Pitcher: Good day for outfielders. Cloudy Day (no brim shadows!) and Strikeout Pitcher -- perfect day for in-game portraits, Adjust your game plan based on your circumstances. It really helps.

LEARN THE SHADOW BRUSH TOOL: If you shoot baseball regularly, you MUST learn to use the brush tool to remove as much of the shadow from under the brim as possible. It’s easy. It’s important. It’s expected. And it takes 3 seconds.
 
Last edited:
THE EYES HAVE IT: 99% of the time I cannot/will not submit a baseball photo where the viewer can’t make easy eye contact with the player. I need to fill 80%+ of that frame with the player(s) and I need to see some eyeballs.
+1. It's hard to get too tight. This was really a grab shot with too long of a lens on a 3rd base slide. They've used it a LOT, and I think mainly as I was low enough to see the whole face including the eyes, usually these slide shots the eyes are under the visor.



 Ft. Myers Miracle Niko Goodrum (2014)

Ft. Myers Miracle Niko Goodrum (2014)

It's also a good example of seeing an angle that fans can't readily see. This was standing in the dug out dugout so very near ground level.

--
Comments welcomed on photos: http://www.captivephotons.com
 
THE EYES HAVE IT: 99% of the time I cannot/will not submit a baseball photo where the viewer can’t make easy eye contact with the player. I need to fill 80%+ of that frame with the player(s) and I need to see some eyeballs.
Not baseball - but I know what you mean about the eyes.....



 

Attachments

  • 3280458.jpg
    3280458.jpg
    5.4 MB · Views: 0
THE EYES HAVE IT: 99% of the time I cannot/will not submit a baseball photo where the viewer can’t make easy eye contact with the player. I need to fill 80%+ of that frame with the player(s) and I need to see some eyeballs.
Not baseball - but I know what you mean about the eyes.....
Many years ago I heard a Nat Geo photographer talk about the importance of eye contact in impactful photos ... said there is something psychologically quantifiable about how much more deeply we connect with a photo if we can make eye contact with the featured person. Even the time spent looking at an images increases significantly if the photographer makes that possible. The extreme example of that is McCurry's famous Afghan Girl.

That lecture stuck with me. I think we all know it intuitively -- it's central to portraiture. But we don't always factor it into our sports pictures as effectively as we might. I know I'm guilty.

OK --I'll start an EYES thread.
 
Last edited:
THE EYES HAVE IT: 99% of the time I cannot/will not submit a baseball photo where the viewer can’t make easy eye contact with the player. I need to fill 80%+ of that frame with the player(s) and I need to see some eyeballs.
Not baseball - but I know what you mean about the eyes.....
Many years ago I heard a Nat Geo photographer talk about the importance of eye contact in impactful photos ... said there is something psychologically quantifiable about how much more deeply we connect with a photo if we can make eye contact with the featured person. Even the time spent looking at an images increases significantly if the photographer makes that possible. The extreme example of that is McCurry's famous Afghan Girl.

That lecture stuck with me. I think we all know it intuitively -- it's central to portraiture. But we don't always factor it into our sports pictures as effectively as we might. I know I'm guilty.

OK --I'll start an EYES thread.
That would be good to see !
 
Yep - every one of those is 1000 times more interesting than a pitcher or batter shot. All are much more interesting stories
 
Yep - every one of those is 1000 times more interesting than a pitcher or batter shot. All are much more interesting stories
This would certainly been fun to try and shoot!!!!

 
Personal taste? Too much saturation caught my eyes before I focused on the batter.
 
Different strokes for different folks. In general I find shots of ball at plate very boring. It's like taking shots of free throws at basketball or serves in volleyball. It's cool to get that first bat-on-ball shot but quite honestly when you have hundreds of opportunities, it's really not that skillful to come away with some and images like the one above just aren't compelling storytelling. I mean, when was the last time you saw bat-on-ball or just ball over plate shots in SI or any major sports page? Spend less time taking shots of the pitch and try to capture the real action in the field/bases.

713f7dc3e7c54606b0119b8b8635b4a7.jpg

John,

I did laugh out loud this morning when I opened the sports section of the newspaper today and saw the Associated Press photo staring at me. :)

Gotta admit that's pretty funny

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Different strokes for different folks. In general I find shots of ball at plate very boring. It's like taking shots of free throws at basketball or serves in volleyball. It's cool to get that first bat-on-ball shot but quite honestly when you have hundreds of opportunities, it's really not that skillful to come away with some and images like the one above just aren't compelling storytelling. I mean, when was the last time you saw bat-on-ball or just ball over plate shots in SI or any major sports page? Spend less time taking shots of the pitch and try to capture the real action in the field/bases.

713f7dc3e7c54606b0119b8b8635b4a7.jpg

John,

I did laugh out loud this morning when I opened the sports section of the newspaper today and saw the Associated Press photo staring at me. :)

Gotta admit that's pretty funny

Cheers
Agree :)
 
I went to a game this weekend with this thread in mind. I focused on trying to get their eyes. It truly changed my perspective.







 

Attachments

  • 3436630.jpg
    3436630.jpg
    4.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 3436631.jpg
    3436631.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 0
I like them a lot.
 
Hey, I took some of the advice offered and had a chance to put it to use at the HS ball tourney this weekend. what do you think

 Captured more faces and reaction. This was a really cool moment of the batter dodging a high fastball
Captured more faces and reaction. This was a really cool moment of the batter dodging a high fastball



 using faster shutter speeds and different angles to get the full face
using faster shutter speeds and different angles to get the full face



 A cool perspective not an average fan shot
A cool perspective not an average fan shot



 On Deck profile, should have been just a little different angle so the bat wasn't just covering the batters head, but I really liked the image
On Deck profile, should have been just a little different angle so the bat wasn't just covering the batters head, but I really liked the image



 shooting the coach
shooting the coach



 okay not the sharpest picture, but the expression on the catchers face was priceless as another run came in and he couldn't do anything.
okay not the sharpest picture, but the expression on the catchers face was priceless as another run came in and he couldn't do anything.



 Coaches watching the game (trying to get the action away from the action)
Coaches watching the game (trying to get the action away from the action)



 another example of the faster shutter speed and getting more facial expression
another example of the faster shutter speed and getting more facial expression



 changing it up again going wide and high
changing it up again going wide and high



 Dropping the ball, again getting more face and the action of a runner sliding into home
Dropping the ball, again getting more face and the action of a runner sliding into home



 I thought this was a cool shot, getting closer to the players to get tighter shots, love that you can see all of his number, his face and he is looking into the light.
I thought this was a cool shot, getting closer to the players to get tighter shots, love that you can see all of his number, his face and he is looking into the light.



 Detail shots
Detail shots



 This one I liked because 1. it was the action shot, but also it kind of looked like the evolution picture
This one I liked because 1. it was the action shot, but also it kind of looked like the evolution picture



 details
details



 emotion and jubilation shot
emotion and jubilation shot



 action shot with faces
action shot with faces



 and to round it out a nice portrait of the officials
and to round it out a nice portrait of the officials
 
Shot 1: You got the face, just no ball.
shot 2: way too much uninteresting dead space in the frame. The umpire is a major distraction. I find shots where the ball is just releasing much more interesting than the ball 1/2 way to the plate. This allows the shot to be framed tighter on the pitcher and not have the action filling only 1/3 of the frame

shot 2: nothing about this shot works for me. I don't agree it is a "cool perspective"

shot 3: don't really like the framing here. the expression is pushed to the right side of the frame and attention is drawn to very uninteresting background instead. Just doesn't work

shot 4: a picture of someone standing. Not interesting

shot 5: most interesting so far. crop tighter. Also, not sure where you were located when you took this - background is still a bit distracting, so you want to shoot as tight as you can in-camera to blur the background more. At this point, best you can do is crop tighter

shot 6: good idea on the shot. The problem is the framing - the coach in focus is pushed a little too far to the right of the frame so the other coach is a bit more of a distraction. But, I like this shot idea most of all your creative attempts

shot 7: 1/640 isn't a fast enough shutter speed. You've still got too much blur. Think 1/2000 for pitchers.

shot 8: play at plate. You've got the runner's face which is good. Lots of dead space. Might as well crop this portrait orientation to get rid of all the unnecessary dead space.

out of time. Keep at it and keep seeking feedback and you'll continue to get better. In looking at your photos the biggest issue I can see is you're framing too loosely and cropping too much - with high quality lenses you can get away with that more. In your next outing, try to frame much tighter in-camera. In fact, here's an exercise for you. Set the lens to 300mm and don't touch the zoom at all. You'll miss some shots, but the ones you get will be a lot better.
 
some new shots of baseball action



 some on field coaching
some on field coaching



no eyes in the shot, but the number and a play at first
no eyes in the shot, but the number and a play at first



a beautiful strike
a beautiful strike



pitcher
pitcher



an error
an error



an out on a sliding play at 3rd
an out on a sliding play at 3rd



barely safe at first
barely safe at first



who wins the race the runner or the ball
who wins the race the runner or the ball



coaching the team between innings
coaching the team between innings



pitcher from 1st base side
pitcher from 1st base side



Safe at first
Safe at first
 
some new shots of baseball action

some on field coaching
some on field coaching

no eyes in the shot, but the number and a play at first
no eyes in the shot, but the number and a play at first

a beautiful strike
a beautiful strike

pitcher
pitcher

an error
an error

an out on a sliding play at 3rd
an out on a sliding play at 3rd

barely safe at first
barely safe at first

who wins the race the runner or the ball
who wins the race the runner or the ball

coaching the team between innings
coaching the team between innings

pitcher from 1st base side
pitcher from 1st base side

Safe at first
Safe at first
OK, but it looks like you may have some exposure issues



 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top