The first A6300 full/deep review (lots of image & demo video) :-)

lhkjacky

Senior Member
Messages
2,955
Solutions
15
Reaction score
3,071
Last edited:
Thanks lhkjacky for posting the link.

I played a little bit with those raws. I opened them in RawDigger (both for A6300 and A6000). Exported them as Tiffs and opened them in LR. I applied to all of them +51 Tint in WB because they had a horrible orange cast (RawDigger?). Nothing else done, did not touch NR. Exported them as Jpegs, quality 90%. This is what I got (view at 1:2):



aba1cff745024db6bb21c2e42285d567.jpg



856e5174dc6d460ba14b97091c7cde07.jpg



6e5ec8cb54d64853bee1f025cfc01ffc.jpg



b1f2a355961b4e91904a4c12d3bc704b.jpg
 
This is showing bigger advantage of 6300 vs 6000 at iso 6400 and up than I've seen in other comparisons, all of which were partial/early.

Interesting.

Thanks.
 
I was myself surprised. Could RawDigger mess the raws somehow?
 
ISO 6400 , A6300 VS A6000

RAW open in faststone at 100%

16eeb6aaeb804b15bfa6a4f6b11f49f9.jpg



b813e4c03add4b47becb2de4cb1d86fe.jpg



d4aad672b7ab4e64a3f283b82133eb1a.jpg
 
Hi,

Do you know what lens is he using taking the portrait images of the model, the images looked really good? at 82mm f1.8 at mainly ISO100.

Thanks for posting the link.
 
Last edited:
Unless I am reading his article wrong, the 3 lens he used is SEL1670Z, SEL55F18Z and also SEL70200G.

Looks like all but 1 of the model shot he used the SEL55F18Z
 
Hi,

Do you know what lens is he using taking the portrait images of the model, the images looked really good? at 82mm f1.8 at mainly ISO100.

Thanks for posting the link.
It seem it is the FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA.

Because he said he love this lens very much, and he like use it for portrait .

55mm in APSC is 82mm (35mm eqv.)
 
I think you just killed this thread.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top