FrankieJ
Senior Member
Shouldn't it be "gear are already plural...." ;-)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shouldn't it be "gear are already plural...." ;-)
Not 'we'. Some may do. Probably a small minority that should know better.Oh we say that here in the UK too - drives me bananas! Even people who seem quite intelligent do it.The rules aren't arbitrary, it's just a matter of education.And don't get me started on apostrophes. I know the contradictory and arbitrary rules surrounding them but as most of my countrymen don't they're pointless except as a trap for pedants.
My favourite is the Americanism of saying... "Don't loose your lens cap". -You see that alot.
-
As an exercise, punctuate this sentence so that it makes sense...
Jim where John had had had had had had had had had had had the teacher's approval.
My car has many gears.But in the case of the OP's rant, it's just a mistake by someone for whom English isn't his first language. No need for a rant.
I've never heard an English native speaker say 'gears'.
Cars have gears? No way! Sheesh!Not 'we'. Some may do. Probably a small minority that should know better.Oh we say that here in the UK too - drives me bananas! Even people who seem quite intelligent do it.The rules aren't arbitrary, it's just a matter of education.And don't get me started on apostrophes. I know the contradictory and arbitrary rules surrounding them but as most of my countrymen don't they're pointless except as a trap for pedants.
My favourite is the Americanism of saying... "Don't loose your lens cap". -You see that alot.
-
As an exercise, punctuate this sentence so that it makes sense...
Jim where John had had had had had had had had had had had the teacher's approval.
My car has many gears.But in the case of the OP's rant, it's just a mistake by someone for whom English isn't his first language. No need for a rant.
I've never heard an English native speaker say 'gears'.
Indeed. As a person who speaks English for less than 20% of the time, I strive to improve and welcome corrections to both spelling and grammar. However, mistakes and typos do often happen despite my best effort and some proof reading. More often than not I re-read my posts some time after the posting and am appalled by some blatant mistake I have made, which often can't be edited due to a reply being posted to it. Most embarrassing!It's perfectly ok to make mistakes, I know that if I were not using a language term properly that I would want to be corrected, that's how I improve myself. =)Hahha!! Hilarious! I love this quote from you, it's like teeth is already plural it wouldn't be added with tooths paste!what is a native english speaker speak, it is not necessarily we should make it perfect as non native. It is Okay to make mistakes, right ? Even my fave native teacher in Preply told me the same tone. http://preply.com/en/skype/english-native-speakers
Shouldn't it be "gear are already plural...." ;-)
Grammar Girl (admittedly, my idol)This was our largest argument when my husband I first started dating. He was from Long Island, as in NY, and insisted it was ON line. Whereas I was from RI and I always had to wait IN line.Here's my take - if the reference was towards multiple pieces of equipment, then sure, gear are.Shouldn't it be "gear are already plural...." ;-)
--
John Glover
WSSA #141PX
But in a linguistic discussion about the noun Gear I am referring to a singular item not a collective so gear is works most correctly. But you may be right - it pales compared to people who say waiting ON line, when they are waiting single file to gain admission to someplace, jeez. What, is there an imaginary painted line that they are referring to?
--
Yes Cathy, "There really is a Pink-footed goose, and I have the pictures to prove it." As told to my boss after she had seen "The Big Year"
Really its all getting very confusing for meLet's have less of Len losing his lenses.So you have Len's lenses? He was asking about them over on the Canon forum.No - you have two len's ;-)I had one len, now I got two lens.
Cheers
Brian![]()