Tonkotsu Ramen
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,380
- Reaction score
- 1,326
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will not happen. Can not happen. For reasons I went in to elsewhere.What about comparable glass for N1 that people have been begging for for years?
Sure agree with your comments. It is hard to imagine Nikon will abandon the V3/70-300/32/6.7-13/etc line. If they do, they will seriously damage any existing users for the future. Time will tell, but i hope they have the integrity to tell us . . .I actually find this a little depressing. It's like they took the best stuff from Nikon 1 (PDAF, fast shooting speeds, J5 sensor) and updated it with the glass everyone wanted for N1 and a few other bells and whistles (e.g. NFC). That's all fine and good, but what about something for those that bought into Nikon 1? What about a new V-series body? What about comparable glass for N1 that people have been begging for for years?
If this is a separate line that is successful for them while they still support N1 with new bodies and glass, ok fine. If this is them canabilizing the N1 system just to make some new fixed lens camera, I'm not happy at all.
I admit I don't quite follow why you would need so many cameras, or what goal you achieve by doing so, but if the DL18-50 covers those needs then great!The DL18-50 will single handedly replace 3 of my current cameras.[this J4 with its primes, my Canon G9 X, and my Canon EOS-M3 with the 22mm and 11-22mm.]
About that, the G9 X will be my gf's camera during this trip. My original plan was to just use the M3 + 11-22 during the day, then switch to the 22mm at night. My friend then lent me his J4 with the 10mm and 18.5mm, and I really can't say no to using more gadgets on a trip. If not for the M3's wide zoom, I would just leave it at home, since the J4 with its 2 primes work well enough for me to replace the M3. And by well enough, I mean using the J4 is actually really fun and enjoyable, and the results are great for my purposes.I admit I don't quite follow why you would need so many cameras, or what goal you achieve by doing so, but if the DL18-50 covers those needs then great!The DL18-50 will single handedly replace 3 of my current cameras.[this J4 with its primes, my Canon G9 X, and my Canon EOS-M3 with the 22mm and 11-22mm.]
Although I have a lot of gear, this is mostly for variety and flexibility going out, I almost never carry more than one camera and lens with me at a time.
Since I have all the lenses for my V1, and since the V1 has a built in viewfinder, I will stick with where I am. For the times I need wide angle, the 6.7-13 is more than good enough for me.
TR , are you Hakata , Krume , Nagahama , or other ?
I am of the basic hakata style! Though with each trip to japan, I try to expand and learn more about other styles. Sometimes, the differences are too subtle I don't know that I've eaten a different type of ramen until I get home to review the pics! Though I must say I'm starting to enjoy shoyu/tonkotsu-shoyu ramen more often, especially kitakata and tokushima type ramen.TR , are you Hakata , Krume , Nagahama , or other ?
I like in Kurume.I am of the basic hakata style! Though with each trip to japan, I try to expand and learn more about other styles. Sometimes, the differences are too subtle I don't know that I've eaten a different type of ramen until I get home to review the pics! Though I must say I'm starting to enjoy shoyu/tonkotsu-shoyu ramen more often, especially kitakata and tokushima type ramen.TR , are you Hakata , Krume , Nagahama , or other ?
I like in Kurume.I am of the basic hakata style! Though with each trip to japan, I try to expand and learn more about other styles. Sometimes, the differences are too subtle I don't know that I've eaten a different type of ramen until I get home to review the pics! Though I must say I'm starting to enjoy shoyu/tonkotsu-shoyu ramen more often, especially kitakata and tokushima type ramen.TR , are you Hakata , Krume , Nagahama , or other ?![]()
The AF speed and accuracy. This is the one thing I have found the Sony lacking ( and that's the rX100 MKIV). That's the big win of the Nikon. Also the ergonomics for photography seem better.It's a precise list of everything people wanted, from the EV comp dial and standard hot shoe to f/1.8 and 4K video. Can't say they didn't listen. If you liked the LX100 you'll love these cameras. I would say it's an "RX100 killer" but I'm not yet convinced on that point. The extra EVF for one thing, while the larger lens protrusion and blockier body generally means it isn't quite as pocketable as the RX100.
I do like the zoom ring though. Nice touch.
Styling overall seems unnecessarily harsh though. Almost no curves at all. The echoes to the Nikon film bodies (S3?) in the camera's lines are perceptible, but so faint that most people won't appreciate them anyway.
My opinion? Well, it's not my thing. And not just because the EVF alone costs as much as what three V1 bodies go for nowadays. I'm a lens junkie. A prime lens junkie at that. I'd buy a Coolpix A before I got any of these.
For Nikon my concern is that they've built an RX100, but they haven't outdone the RX100. Not in the 24-70 version anyway. Not that I can see.
Wins are wins. If people disliked the RX100 AF or ergonomics, then Nikon can leverage that. If they are basically happy already maybe not so much.The AF speed and accuracy. This is the one thing I have found the Sony lacking ( and that's the rX100 MKIV). That's the big win of the Nikon. Also the ergonomics for photography seem better.It's a precise list of everything people wanted, from the EV comp dial and standard hot shoe to f/1.8 and 4K video. Can't say they didn't listen. If you liked the LX100 you'll love these cameras. I would say it's an "RX100 killer" but I'm not yet convinced on that point. The extra EVF for one thing, while the larger lens protrusion and blockier body generally means it isn't quite as pocketable as the RX100.
I do like the zoom ring though. Nice touch.
Styling overall seems unnecessarily harsh though. Almost no curves at all. The echoes to the Nikon film bodies (S3?) in the camera's lines are perceptible, but so faint that most people won't appreciate them anyway.
My opinion? Well, it's not my thing. And not just because the EVF alone costs as much as what three V1 bodies go for nowadays. I'm a lens junkie. A prime lens junkie at that. I'd buy a Coolpix A before I got any of these.
For Nikon my concern is that they've built an RX100, but they haven't outdone the RX100. Not in the 24-70 version anyway. Not that I can see.
No, not bad at all. As good as can be reasonably expected. The external EVF is the only real pain point, but I see the logic of not paying for something you don't need, and getting a really nice one if you do. I just prefer it built in, since I use it all the time.Honestly given the prices, not bad at all (ah yes, they outclass the Sony in price too). Unless the lens is bad, the Sony RX100 MKIII/MKIV lens is actually pretty darn good.
If the image quality is as good as an RX100, then in many situations that's as good as a Nikon 1.Wins are wins. If people disliked the RX100 AF or ergonomics, then Nikon can leverage that. If they are basically happy already maybe not so much.The AF speed and accuracy. This is the one thing I have found the Sony lacking ( and that's the rX100 MKIV). That's the big win of the Nikon. Also the ergonomics for photography seem better.It's a precise list of everything people wanted, from the EV comp dial and standard hot shoe to f/1.8 and 4K video. Can't say they didn't listen. If you liked the LX100 you'll love these cameras. I would say it's an "RX100 killer" but I'm not yet convinced on that point. The extra EVF for one thing, while the larger lens protrusion and blockier body generally means it isn't quite as pocketable as the RX100.
I do like the zoom ring though. Nice touch.
Styling overall seems unnecessarily harsh though. Almost no curves at all. The echoes to the Nikon film bodies (S3?) in the camera's lines are perceptible, but so faint that most people won't appreciate them anyway.
My opinion? Well, it's not my thing. And not just because the EVF alone costs as much as what three V1 bodies go for nowadays. I'm a lens junkie. A prime lens junkie at that. I'd buy a Coolpix A before I got any of these.
For Nikon my concern is that they've built an RX100, but they haven't outdone the RX100. Not in the 24-70 version anyway. Not that I can see.
No, not bad at all. As good as can be reasonably expected. The external EVF is the only real pain point, but I see the logic of not paying for something you don't need, and getting a really nice one if you do. I just prefer it built in, since I use it all the time.Honestly given the prices, not bad at all (ah yes, they outclass the Sony in price too). Unless the lens is bad, the Sony RX100 MKIII/MKIV lens is actually pretty darn good.
I'm sure the image quality will be as good as RX100. But as good as Nikon 1. This I doubt. One has to cling to something you know!!