80D announced

Anyone else fund it odd the 80D and G7 X2 have the same ISO range topping out at only 25600 in extended custom settings? The 3.2m ISO of the D500 is a stupidly high and even 800,000 will be unusable on it but not even 51200 from Canon.
Canon tends to be relatively conservative with most things they do. They're slow. Methodical. They don't take many chances. And they tend to understate things (usually - occasionally it's the opposite).
You didn't get my point. The 80D sensor is much bigger than the 1 inch sensor in the G7 yet the iso ranges are the same. If iso 25600 is OK for Canon QC in the G7 X2, the upper limit should be iso 102400 in the much larger sensor 80D.
I meant to type more...

They're being conservative with expectations of the target audience of the 70D. I'm sure 25600 on the 1" sensor will be pretty awful. But 1" sensor buyers aren't as picky as DSLR buyers.

Heck, the 5DS/R only goes to what, 6400?
5Ds has small pixels so high noise at very high iso. It's OK to be conservative in the normal iso range but give users an option for more than just 1 measly extra stop in custom functions!
 
as a possible returnee to the canon fold (I went Olympian some years ago) I'm wondering about whether the 80D or the 7D mk2 (which seem to be around the same price) would be the best option for wildlife and BIF shooting

I realise the 80D is just released but based on the specs + early comments I wondered what anyone here thought?
 
as a possible returnee to the canon fold (I went Olympian some years ago) I'm wondering about whether the 80D or the 7D mk2 (which seem to be around the same price) would be the best option for wildlife and BIF shooting

I realise the 80D is just released but based on the specs + early comments I wondered what anyone here thought?
 
as a possible returnee to the canon fold (I went Olympian some years ago) I'm wondering about whether the 80D or the 7D mk2 (which seem to be around the same price) would be the best option for wildlife and BIF shooting

I realise the 80D is just released but based on the specs + early comments I wondered what anyone here thought?
 
5Ds has small pixels so high noise at very high iso. It's OK to be conservative in the normal iso range but give users an option for more than just 1 measly extra stop in custom functions!
And the 80D has smaller pixels than the 5Ds.
 
as a possible returnee to the canon fold (I went Olympian some years ago) I'm wondering about whether the 80D or the 7D mk2 (which seem to be around the same price) would be the best option for wildlife and BIF shooting

I realise the 80D is just released but based on the specs + early comments I wondered what anyone here thought?
 
Seems like an amazing camera.

And the sensor? Pretty similar to 1D XII.

http://cweb.canon.jp/eos/lineup/80d/feature-highquality.html

So, most likely on chip ADC.

This is 70D, scrol down for the sensor pic and see the difference.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/canon-70d/canon-70dA.HTM

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/catch45/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aftab/
I hope you're right.

But I don't give much credit to the difference between 80D sensor picture and 70D sensor picture.

Have you compared 80D sensor picture to 760D sensor picture? To me they're almost the same.
 
not all lenses can use the 45 cross type point either

Link

* The vast majority of currently-available Canon EF and EF-S lenses provide cross-type coverage at all 45 AF points. Among current lenses, noteworthy exceptions are the EF-S 10–18mm f/4.5–5.6 IS STM lens (all 45 points active, but cross-type AF only at central 15 points); the EF 11–24mm f/4L USM (outer-most vertical row at left/right become single-line sensors; cross-type at all other AF points); and the EF 100mm f/2.8 USM macro lens (without IS), which limits AF to the central 35 AF points, with cross-type coverage at the central 15 points. Note that many older, discontinued EF and EF-S lenses may limit AF coverage as well.
 
Man this camera comes with more asterisks, exceptions and, buts than anything i've ever seen...
 
not all lenses can use the 45 cross type point either

Link

* The vast majority of currently-available Canon EF and EF-S lenses provide cross-type coverage at all 45 AF points. Among current lenses, noteworthy exceptions are the EF-S 10–18mm f/4.5–5.6 IS STM lens (all 45 points active, but cross-type AF only at central 15 points); the EF 11–24mm f/4L USM (outer-most vertical row at left/right become single-line sensors; cross-type at all other AF points); and the EF 100mm f/2.8 USM macro lens (without IS), which limits AF to the central 35 AF points, with cross-type coverage at the central 15 points. Note that many older, discontinued EF and EF-S lenses may limit AF coverage as well.
yes. most canon cameras have this once you get past a certain number of points. 7D2, 1 series / 5D III,etc.
 
Seems like an amazing camera.

And the sensor? Pretty similar to 1D XII.

http://cweb.canon.jp/eos/lineup/80d/feature-highquality.html

So, most likely on chip ADC.

This is 70D, scrol down for the sensor pic and see the difference.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/canon-70d/canon-70dA.HTM

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/catch45/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aftab/
I hope you're right.

But I don't give much credit to the difference between 80D sensor picture and 70D sensor picture.

Have you compared 80D sensor picture to 760D sensor picture? To me they're almost the same.
that is a very very very good call on that.

it could certainly be there's different generations of sensors (we hope).

however there's a good chance that the 80D sensor may not be much better than the 760D sensor.

in which case I'll need popcorn.

to be fair, I find the 760D sensor to be quite good .. i rarely have a scene that I can't single expose, in which I would not want to bracket because the DR is extreme (extreme as in +2/-2EV AEB does not cover it)
 
Last edited:
as a possible returnee to the canon fold (I went Olympian some years ago) I'm wondering about whether the 80D or the 7D mk2 (which seem to be around the same price) would be the best option for wildlife and BIF shooting

I realise the 80D is just released but based on the specs + early comments I wondered what anyone here thought?
Hi Brian.

I'm planning to buy an 80D to use alongside my 7D2 - they have different strengths and I think they will complement each other superbly for my usage, which has a lot in common with yours I think. If I could only have one it would be a very tough choice but I'd have to stick with the 7D2. The 80D's new AF system looks superb but the 7D2 is still ahead, with more AF points and more sophisticated tracking. The 7D2 body also handles better than the XXD's, which is very important for wildlife, especially birds. 10 fps is very useful too!

Points against the 7D2 are the lack of a swivel/touch screen, and lack of wifi, but if you're not bothered by any of those then that's what I'd go for. And as you point out, at current pricing there is not much difference which makes the 7D2 a bargain.
 
as a possible returnee to the canon fold (I went Olympian some years ago) I'm wondering about whether the 80D or the 7D mk2 (which seem to be around the same price) would be the best option for wildlife and BIF shooting

I realise the 80D is just released but based on the specs + early comments I wondered what anyone here thought?
Hi Brian.

I'm planning to buy an 80D to use alongside my 7D2 - they have different strengths and I think they will complement each other superbly for my usage, which has a lot in common with yours I think. If I could only have one it would be a very tough choice but I'd have to stick with the 7D2. The 80D's new AF system looks superb but the 7D2 is still ahead, with more AF points and more sophisticated tracking. The 7D2 body also handles better than the XXD's, which is very important for wildlife, especially birds. 10 fps is very useful too!

Points against the 7D2 are the lack of a swivel/touch screen, and lack of wifi, but if you're not bothered by any of those then that's what I'd go for. And as you point out, at current pricing there is not much difference which makes the 7D2 a bargain.
 
not all lenses can use the 45 cross type point either

Link

* The vast majority of currently-available Canon EF and EF-S lenses provide cross-type coverage at all 45 AF points. Among current lenses, noteworthy exceptions are the EF-S 10–18mm f/4.5–5.6 IS STM lens (all 45 points active, but cross-type AF only at central 15 points); the EF 11–24mm f/4L USM (outer-most vertical row at left/right become single-line sensors; cross-type at all other AF points); and the EF 100mm f/2.8 USM macro lens (without IS), which limits AF to the central 35 AF points, with cross-type coverage at the central 15 points. Note that many older, discontinued EF and EF-S lenses may limit AF coverage as well.
Perhaps some 3rd party lenses as well.
 
Seems like an amazing camera.

And the sensor? Pretty similar to 1D XII.

http://cweb.canon.jp/eos/lineup/80d/feature-highquality.html

So, most likely on chip ADC.

This is 70D, scrol down for the sensor pic and see the difference.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/canon-70d/canon-70dA.HTM

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/catch45/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aftab/
I hope you're right.

But I don't give much credit to the difference between 80D sensor picture and 70D sensor picture.

Have you compared 80D sensor picture to 760D sensor picture? To me they're almost the same.
I am not an expert in any of these. But I read Bob's comments and this is what I understood.





70D here is very different. 760D, 80D and 1D XII are more similar, obvious difference between them is the size of the blue border (masking area) surrounding the pixel array, this is much larger in 80D and 1D XII. Look at 1D XII, inside or within the blue border at the top and bottom left (your left hand side), there are black structures. According to Bob those are likely to be termination of a bus suggesting column parallel ADC. You can see the similar structures (although finer) in 80D too, but not in 760D.

These are all speculations of course, but 760D doesn't appear quite the same as 80D or 1D XII.



--
 

Attachments

  • 3397878.jpg
    3397878.jpg
    198.4 KB · Views: 0
Yeah DPR seems impressed with this camera. And that doesn't happen often these days with Canon cameras. :)

--
You're not implying they have an agenda or anything are you? :)
I think they are a bit nerdy.

And maybe they are now more aware of the fact that there have been allegations of anti-Canon bias among some DPR staffs.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top