Reading mode: Light Dark

Dear NIKON , i want a d760 like that one . WHO'S WITH ME ?

Go to last post
krikman said:
Liebe Volkswagen!
wassim al malak said:
Hello for all .
Click to expand...
Hallo fuer Alles!
krikman said:
no doubt , the d750 is an excellent camera , armed with a lot of features packed in a light weight body , but , nothing can live forever .
Click to expand...
No doubt, VW golf ist das excellent Auto.
krikman said:
in such cameras evolution , a d750 must have a successor more versatile , more powerful , which can meet other competitors .

for me (and i think for a lot of photographers) , i need to power the d760 with :
Click to expand...
But for me, I need to power VW Golf 5+ with:
krikman said:
0- IBIS .
Click to expand...
0. front skid for stability in snow.
krikman said:
1- no low-pass filter .
Click to expand...
1. no shock absorbers and springs
krikman said:
2- enhance ISO performance .
Click to expand...
2. enhance mood performance
krikman said:
3- AF points : all cross-type , covering all the VF .
Click to expand...
3. Seats: all with their own steering wheel, covering entire car. (I want randomly choose seat for driving)
krikman said:
4- deeper buffer .
Click to expand...
4. more seats for more passengers.
krikman said:
5- more speed .
Click to expand...
5. more speed
krikman said:
6- more FPS .
Click to expand...
6. even more speed
krikman said:
7- something like the dual-pixel AF system such as canon .
Click to expand...
7. something like the very long handlebars such as choppers.
krikman said:
8- one SD , one CF .
Click to expand...
one gazoline tank, one coal bunker
krikman said:
9- circular eye piece .
Click to expand...
AEW radar .
krikman said:
dear NIKON , i think that will be acceptable due the competition from SONY and others :)
Click to expand...
Liebe Volkswagen, I think that will be same price, due to competition from steam rollers, maritime patrol aircrafts, Harley-Davidson, snowmobiles, ferrari sportcars and bulldozers.
krikman said:
dear photographer , your votes and comments are appreciated .
Click to expand...
Dear Mad Max, your votes and comments are appreciated.
Click to expand...
i'm a cars spare parts agent in my country for :

Renault - Dacia - Peugeot - Citroen - Opel - Hyundai - Kia .

you're playing with the wrong guy :)
 
Tech Addict said:
I just hope with their next body Nikon don't utilise what they see as the next cutting edge storage card (that subsequently nobody adopts) that brings with it near impossible to find card readers and extremely high card prices, as they did with the D4S and XQD, the Betamax of memory cards!

A dumb and expensive decision in my opinion. Pull that trick again and I'll DEFINITELY be giving that body a miss. Don't want to spend half as much as the camera on cards and readers to only to find the technology getting binned for the next iteration, as I suspect XQD will be next time around, requiring yet more money to go down the drain.
Click to expand...
Actually in the D5 generation XQD might not be quite the silliness it seems now, assuming high bit rate 4K video to the card is "on the cards (boom boom!!!).

I wouldn't be totally surprised if CF (over 20 years or so old) was dropped in favour of dual XQD or if XQD is kept if some features are only available on XQD, e.g. high bit rate 4k video.

As such XQD may not have been totally silly in the D4 as a sort of half way step.

-
www.flickr.com

jtan163

Explore jtan163’s 443 photos on Flickr!
www.flickr.com www.flickr.com
 
Tech Addict said:
I just hope with their next body Nikon don't utilise what they see as the next cutting edge storage card (that subsequently nobody adopts) that brings with it near impossible to find card readers and extremely high card prices, as they did with the D4S and XQD, the Betamax of memory cards!

A dumb and expensive decision in my opinion. Pull that trick again and I'll DEFINITELY be giving that body a miss. Don't want to spend half as much as the camera on cards and readers to only to find the technology getting binned for the next iteration, as I suspect XQD will be next time around, requiring yet more money to go down the drain.
Click to expand...
I heard that the next Nikon is going to use Memorystick
 
jtan163 said:
Tech Addict said:
I just hope with their next body Nikon don't utilise what they see as the next cutting edge storage card (that subsequently nobody adopts) that brings with it near impossible to find card readers and extremely high card prices, as they did with the D4S and XQD, the Betamax of memory cards!

A dumb and expensive decision in my opinion. Pull that trick again and I'll DEFINITELY be giving that body a miss. Don't want to spend half as much as the camera on cards and readers to only to find the technology getting binned for the next iteration, as I suspect XQD will be next time around, requiring yet more money to go down the drain.
Click to expand...
Actually in the D5 generation XQD might not be quite the silliness it seems now, assuming high bit rate 4K video to the card is "on the cards (boom boom!!!).

I wouldn't be totally surprised if CF (over 20 years or so old) was dropped in favour of dual XQD or if XQD is kept if some features are only available on XQD, e.g. high bit rate 4k video.

As such XQD may not have been totally silly in the D4 as a sort of half way step.

-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/9762497@N05
http://www.jtpix.com.au
Click to expand...
The fastest standard at the moment is CFast - scary fast, and enormous capacities available right now, at a price. Roughly the same physical size as CF, but roughly three times as fast.
 
AlephNull said:
jtan163 said:
Tech Addict said:
I just hope with their next body Nikon don't utilise what they see as the next cutting edge storage card (that subsequently nobody adopts) that brings with it near impossible to find card readers and extremely high card prices, as they did with the D4S and XQD, the Betamax of memory cards!

A dumb and expensive decision in my opinion. Pull that trick again and I'll DEFINITELY be giving that body a miss. Don't want to spend half as much as the camera on cards and readers to only to find the technology getting binned for the next iteration, as I suspect XQD will be next time around, requiring yet more money to go down the drain.
Click to expand...
Actually in the D5 generation XQD might not be quite the silliness it seems now, assuming high bit rate 4K video to the card is "on the cards (boom boom!!!).

I wouldn't be totally surprised if CF (over 20 years or so old) was dropped in favour of dual XQD or if XQD is kept if some features are only available on XQD, e.g. high bit rate 4k video.

As such XQD may not have been totally silly in the D4 as a sort of half way step.

-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/9762497@N05
http://www.jtpix.com.au
Click to expand...
The fastest standard at the moment is CFast - scary fast, and enormous capacities available right now, at a price. Roughly the same physical size as CF, but roughly three times as fast.
Click to expand...
CFast and XQD both use serial interface and so none of them is faster by design. I do not mind CFast neither XQD - both fast and both require to replace all media, so there is no difference here either. As I said above I do not mind SD either - it slower then any above because very old design, but it fast enough for me. What I hate, however, is compact flash with myriad pins that bends and brake, so one need to insert card very carefully that could be problematic in rush situation. And having two different cards in the same body is plainly stupid and idiotic decisions.
 
KSV said:
AlephNull said:
jtan163 said:
Tech Addict said:
I just hope with their next body Nikon don't utilise what they see as the next cutting edge storage card (that subsequently nobody adopts) that brings with it near impossible to find card readers and extremely high card prices, as they did with the D4S and XQD, the Betamax of memory cards!

A dumb and expensive decision in my opinion. Pull that trick again and I'll DEFINITELY be giving that body a miss. Don't want to spend half as much as the camera on cards and readers to only to find the technology getting binned for the next iteration, as I suspect XQD will be next time around, requiring yet more money to go down the drain.
Click to expand...
Actually in the D5 generation XQD might not be quite the silliness it seems now, assuming high bit rate 4K video to the card is "on the cards (boom boom!!!).

I wouldn't be totally surprised if CF (over 20 years or so old) was dropped in favour of dual XQD or if XQD is kept if some features are only available on XQD, e.g. high bit rate 4k video.

As such XQD may not have been totally silly in the D4 as a sort of half way step.
Click to expand...
The fastest standard at the moment is CFast - scary fast, and enormous capacities available right now, at a price. Roughly the same physical size as CF, but roughly three times as fast.
Click to expand...
CFast and XQD both use serial interface and so none of them is faster by design. I do not mind CFast neither XQD - both fast and both require to replace all media, so there is no difference here either. As I said above I do not mind SD either - it slower then any above because very old design, but it fast enough for me. What I hate, however, is compact flash with myriad pins that bends and brake, so one need to insert card very carefully that could be problematic in rush situation. And having two different cards in the same body is plainly stupid and idiotic decisions.
Click to expand...
So far ( touch wood), I haven't had any problems with CF cards & bent pins on my D2Xs, D3 and D3s, but, maybe because I'm careful when changing cards.

I do agree with you regarding Nikons decision to put two different cards in the D4 series. Add in another battery type ( compared to D2Xs and D3, and I decided not to purchase a D4. My pocket is much happier as well )

Regards Peter
 
wassim al malak said:
Hello for all .

no doubt , the d750 is an excellent camera , armed with a lot of features packed in a light weight body , but , nothing can live forever .

in such cameras evolution , a d750 must have a successor more versatile , more powerful , which can meet other competitors .

for me (and i think for a lot of photographers) , i need to power the d760 with :

0- IBIS .
Click to expand...
Why? Not without potential downsides (cleaning, repair).
wassim al malak said:
1- no low-pass filter .
Click to expand...
Not sure that is a good idea on a 24MP FX.
wassim al malak said:
2- enhance ISO performance .
Click to expand...
You can put this down for any camera.
wassim al malak said:
3- AF points : all cross-type , covering all the VF .
Click to expand...
Is the current AF failing you? Would you pay more for this feature?
wassim al malak said:
4- deeper buffer .

5- more speed .

6- more FPS .
Click to expand...
Three above, if you need those you are buying the wrong camera. D4s is built for speed, go buy that.
wassim al malak said:
7- something like the dual-pixel AF system such as canon .
Click to expand...
AF works quite well on the Nikon cams.
wassim al malak said:
8- one SD , one CF .
Click to expand...
That is what my D810 has, I would happily trade that for two of the same type, just pick one. Hate having two types of cards. Why???
wassim al malak said:
9- circular eye piece .
Click to expand...
Why? This will help you take better photos?
wassim al malak said:
dear NIKON , i think that will be acceptable due the competition from SONY and others :)

dear photographer , your votes and comments are appreciated .
Click to expand...
Nikon sells more cameras than Sony, so I guess they are doing something right.
 
knightmelodic said:
chuxter said:
knightmelodic said:
wassim al malak said:
knightmelodic said:
I'd want 1/8000 shutter and dedicated AF-ON button. I think those are more likely than what you listed because you can get your list on a D4.

--
Just keep clicking, something will turn out fantastic.
Click to expand...
NIKON reserve those the pro body , not for d760 .

anyway , i wish .
Click to expand...
Actually they list the 750 as a pro body.
Click to expand...
It depends on who "they" is and which list you look on. This issue of Nikon having two lists which don't agree as to the "Pro" status of the D750 has been around since the beginning.

All true Pro photographers know that a "real" Nikon pro camera has a round VF window. :-)
Click to expand...
Cheers. All true true Pro Photographers know a pro camera is one that makes them money....:-)
Click to expand...
Yep, but the issue is that Nikon has TWO lists of what it considers to be "Pro" camera for two different purposes. One is their NPS list:


I don't remember what the other list was for, but it was different.

 
KSV said:
AlephNull said:
jtan163 said:
Tech Addict said:
I just hope with their next body Nikon don't utilise what they see as the next cutting edge storage card (that subsequently nobody adopts) that brings with it near impossible to find card readers and extremely high card prices, as they did with the D4S and XQD, the Betamax of memory cards!

A dumb and expensive decision in my opinion. Pull that trick again and I'll DEFINITELY be giving that body a miss. Don't want to spend half as much as the camera on cards and readers to only to find the technology getting binned for the next iteration, as I suspect XQD will be next time around, requiring yet more money to go down the drain.
Click to expand...
Actually in the D5 generation XQD might not be quite the silliness it seems now, assuming high bit rate 4K video to the card is "on the cards (boom boom!!!).

I wouldn't be totally surprised if CF (over 20 years or so old) was dropped in favour of dual XQD or if XQD is kept if some features are only available on XQD, e.g. high bit rate 4k video.

As such XQD may not have been totally silly in the D4 as a sort of half way step.

-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/9762497@N05
http://www.jtpix.com.au
Click to expand...
The fastest standard at the moment is CFast - scary fast, and enormous capacities available right now, at a price. Roughly the same physical size as CF, but roughly three times as fast.
Click to expand...
CFast and XQD both use serial interface and so none of them is faster by design. I do not mind CFast neither XQD - both fast and both require to replace all media, so there is no difference here either. As I said above I do not mind SD either - it slower then any above because very old design, but it fast enough for me. What I hate, however, is compact flash with myriad pins that bends and brake, so one need to insert card very carefully that could be problematic in rush situation. And having two different cards in the same body is plainly stupid and idiotic decisions.
Click to expand...
Current fastest XQD I could find quotes 450MB/s read 350 MB/s write. The current fastest CFast I could find is 515 MB/s read, 440 MB/s write. So arguably CFast is current fastest, but yeah, they are comparable standards.

The CFast standard is physically larger, so it has more capacity for flash chips. At any given chip density, CFast will be able to hold more data than XQD.

Of course, we may not be able to afford the cards... :(
 
I'm not so sure about that. I consider my D610 a more serious camera than my A7II, the D610 has vastly better autofocus, better continuous burst, easier access to most controls and feels more substantially built. I can't believe that the A7II can really compare to the D750 favourably in any regard except resolution and body size.
 
a7II is the competitor to d750 due to the tilt screen , video features , which d610 doesn't have .
 
And what about the features the D610 and D750 have that the A7II doesn't? The A7II will only do 2.5fps with continuous autofocus and it's tracking is garbage compared to the D610. I love my A7II, but I'm telling you it's not a better camera than my D610 for any kind of photography that involves moving subjects.
 
Last edited:
i didn't say that a7II is better , i said it's the sony's competitor to the d750 .
 
I'm telling you it isn't. It has half the frame rate and can't track moving subjects anywhere close to as well. A tilting screen does not give it a competitive feature set with the D750.
 
sure , the d750 is better , no doubt .

it's my dream camera now :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top