In market for a new pc for photography more or less, An opinion of
what you would purchasen, Brand, Ram, HD, Memory etc. ( Off the
shelf XP ) Thanks for your input. Lee
Well, since I know a lot more about computers than I do about
photography, I might as well toss a couple of pennies into the
discussion. I spec new workstations fairly regularly, so I'm at
least somewhat up-to-date on technology.
Firstly, if you're going to spend more than $1500 or so, I'd go
with something custom rather than a Dell. For $600 you really
can't beat the deals Dell has these days (especially considering
warranty), but I definitely wouldn't shell out a couple of grand
for a Dell.
I like Antec cases. Simple enough, good power supplies, easy to
work on. They've got a pretty nice-looking case called the Sonata,
which seems to be well-built. Not the case I'd want if I were
overclocking, but should be a great desktop case.
As far as motherboards go, I like Asus, although you probably won't
go wrong with something like Abit or Tyan. There are lots of other
good ones, but those are a couple.
For the processor, I'd go with a P4 with an 800 MHz FSB. If the
price is too steep, The AMD Athlon XPs with the 333 MHz FSB are
solid performers.
For RAM, grab a stick or two of 512MB Crucial. Kingston, Corsair,
and Mushkin are other good brands. If you're running an 800 MHz
FSB, I'd go with PC3200, but if you're running a 333 MHz FSB,
PC2700 will do nicely.
One of the most exciting products to come out recently is Western
Digital's 10k RPM serial ATA Raptor hard drive. They run about
$170 for a 36.something GB model, but it greatly speeds up one of
the major bottlenecks in today's computers. Make sure your choice
of motherboard has a SATA controller. If you really want fast disk
access, get two and configure them as a RAID-0 array. Either way,
you'll probably want more disk space, so grab one or two Western
Digital 7200 RPM drives with the 8MB cache. You choose the size,
but less than 80GB isn't really cost-effective.
A quick aside related to hard disks: many people only use one large
partition these days, as all recent operating systems can recognize
such large partitions. However, doing this does have one advantage
that you may or may not care about. With partitions of 16-32GB,
the cluster size is 16KB, which means that no matter how small a
file is, it will use 16KB of disk space. If you go above a 32GB
partition, up to 2TB, the cluster size jumps to 32KB. Since disk
space is cheap these days, most people don't worry about this
cluster waste, but it's worth thinking about if you're going to
have a partition close to the 32GB limit anyway (if my math is
correct, 32GB = 34,359,738,368 bytes, or 33,554,432 kilobytes).
As far as monitors go, a 21" CRT will probably look better than a
19" LCD, and will be a little cheaper too. Personal preference
here.
Matrox video cards are considered excellent for 2D, but if you want
3D I'd probably go with an ATI Radeon 9500 Pro. Really, either one
should perform great.
The other components won't factor into the performance as much, so
I won't bother mentioning anything specific. Don't forget that
decent sound and network support will likely come on the
motherboard.
Good luck.