Bought a new Sony DSC-HX400V Yesterday

DHPatrick

Member
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
Location
Romania
Most might think it is a bit presumptuous of me to write a review of a camera I just so recently purchased. I took it on a trial run this morning and almost fell over with it's features.

I'm barely an amateur in this field, but have been heavily interested into photography since 1967, when I purchased my first Pentax Spotmatic F. I liked it so well I purchased another one as well. I've purchased a number of cameras over the years and have enjoyed each of them, but have learned from each as well. Recently, I noticed a scratch on the lens pf my Nikon Coolpix L610, so I went by a local store here at Sibiu, Romania to replace it.

In the store I spotted a camera with a Carl Zeiss lenses - Sony DSC-HX400V. It was their demo model, but I had to have it anyway. They had a hard time separating the camera from their security system. The security guard, trying to help, put a big figure print on the lens. Then we discovered the battery was missing. Replaced with another battery, I still wanted the camera.

This morning I went out into the orchard and put the camera though it's paces. I am shocked at the capabilities of this camera. Just keeping track of them is challenge. I think a novice could well use this camera well, but feel that they should stay clear - else they will be paying good money for features they will not understand or use.

I looked for a macro feature to no avail. I attempted to use the wide-angle setting and it worked well as a macro lens. Even telephoto worked if you stepped back far enough. Actually good; since the telephoto will eliminate your own shadows.

I was astounded at the telephoto capabilities. It was steady during shots and really drew the image in. I did notice some loss of detail and some flatness at the longer settings, but not a bad as I had experienced with my Vivitar or Nikkor long telephoto lens. I needed a telephoto capability, I like to crop my images as I'm taking my photos. Better resolution in my mind. Saves me from a lot of work in Photoshop later on. Before anyone gets excited, I know the telephoto introduces optical aberrations and loss of depth of field. Especially at long ranges. I deal with them though.

The camera lens does have a screw on filter/hood mount ability. The instruction book says the lens in 55mm. With such a lens, I advise that a UV or Skylight A1 filter be added to protect the lens coating. The latter is you desire some warmness to your photos. If I can't find one locally, I'll be sure to order one through the Internet.

I loved the auto eye piece setting arrangement, a feature I direly missed with most of my other digital cameras. There was very little lag between the press of the shutter button and the finished camera shot. A very big problem with many of the older digital cameras. I liked the distinct way the half way press of the shutter button behaved. The best grip on a camera I've had so far.

Low light shots are not as spectacular as some of my other cameras - but good enough for my purposes. I'm worried about the harm it may experience from it's most probable exposure to dust and rain. In some ways, the camera does not have a feeling of weight sturdiness as most of my previous cameras. ..but at the same time it does seem to be somewhat robust in feel. More flare in some photo shots than I had expected - a lens hood will be a must - probably a collapsible one. A bit bulkier than my little Nikon. I'll not be able to slide it into my pocket - a camera case will become a must. Guess I'll use my iPhone as a pocket camera backup.

A lot more features to discuss, but - all in time. Is it a keeper? You bet.
 
Some of my first photos with the Sony DSC-HX400V today.

















--
D.Patrick, MBA, MA, USA Ret
 

Attachments

  • 3261966.jpg
    3261966.jpg
    8.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 3261967.jpg
    3261967.jpg
    8.7 MB · Views: 0
  • 3261968.jpg
    3261968.jpg
    9.5 MB · Views: 0
Excellent observations, glad it is a keeper for you. Wonderful first photographs...I can see you made good use of your Spotmatic. You have a good eye for colours and composition. Welcome to the forum. Alexander
 
Some of my first photos with the Sony DSC-HX400V today.







--
D.Patrick, MBA, MA, USA Ret
Great shots! If I buy another camera, this is the camera I will get!!! I have the HX200V and just recently had to use it as my primary for a camping trip because I sold my RX-10 and was waiting on the RX-10M2. The 200 is a very capable camera, the HX300 didn't not appeal to me but the 400 seems like an improvement over the 200!!

Even though I own the RX10M2 also, the HX series has the reach and GPS to be a great all-in-one travel camera!

Enjoy!!
 
Alexander; thank you for your kind words. I'm not a real good photographer, I've resigned myself to that fate years ago, but I certainly do enjoy it's challenge and form. I was intrigued and loved your posted photos. I was disappointed when I only found one photo in your gallery. I suspect, I may have to go through all your posts to enjoy more of your photos.
 
Thanks for your kind words. With a passion, I hope one day to be able to take truly great photos.

I think you will be very happy with the HX400V. After having used many cameras, I find it is a culmination of most all the things I desire in a camera. Lens included. Whats more I find myself excited about photography again. I can hardly wait to get out and take more photos.
 
Some of my first photos with the Sony DSC-HX400V today.







--
D.Patrick, MBA, MA, USA Ret
Great shots! If I buy another camera, this is the camera I will get!!! I have the HX200V and just recently had to use it as my primary for a camping trip because I sold my RX-10 and was waiting on the RX-10M2. The 200 is a very capable camera, the HX300 didn't not appeal to me but the 400 seems like an improvement over the 200!!

Even though I own the RX10M2 also, the HX series has the reach and GPS to be a great all-in-one travel camera!

Enjoy!!
I don't agree that the HX400V is a great all-in-one travel camera. You should be saying that about the RX10 line. The IQ of the HX400V is no where near the RX10. IMO the RX400 is a Cam for pulling in wildlife, etc and in a pinch anything else. But IQ is my top priority so maybe others are less worried about that. Don't get me wrong...I do own both and am perfectly happy with the HX400V. And do think nit's a great deal for the money!

--
Wild Bill
Bill's Photos
 
I would edit Quicky422's last sentence and write ' the HX series has the reach, GPS and GPS logger to be a good choice for an all-in-one travel camera!'

So if IQ is paramount you will have to carry your higher IQ gear (DSLR+lenses for best IQ), defeating the "travelling Light", I am on vacation adage. For a lot of, 'I am on vacation' type photography the RX10 would certainly fit most of the requirements, but IMHO doesn't really have the reach and the IQ is okay for a 1" sensor, (definitely much better than the HX series up to 200mm), but not great.

So we are back to compromises and that is what the HX series and others like it are designed for, jack of all trades and master of none.
 
Last edited:
I would edit Quicky422's last sentence and write ' the HX series has the reach, GPS and GPS logger to be a good choice for an all-in-one travel camera!'

So if IQ is paramount you will have to carry your higher IQ gear (DSLR+lenses for best IQ), defeating the "travelling Light", I am on vacation adage. For a lot of, 'I am on vacation' type photography the RX10 would certainly fit most of the requirements, but IMHO doesn't really have the reach and the IQ is okay for a 1" sensor, (definitely much better than the HX series up to 200mm), but not great.

So we are back to compromises and that is what the HX series and others like it are designed for, jack of all trades and master of none.
Well, I will admit that the HX400v is an excellent cam for getting telephoto shots, and even that the IQ of it is pretty good for overall viewing. Especially when shooter learns how to get the best from it. JUst IMO it is a cam to compliment other cams used by a shooter. I just don't think it is the right choice as an only cam to use.
 
Maybe I need to give the RX100 a look see. I wasn't aware of it until these recent posts. Shows you how active I am researching different cameras.

As I own a lot more cameras than I have admitted to, I suspect I'd be looking at a divorce if I started looking at another so soon. The demise of my pocket Nikon allowed me to get my foot in the door with the HX. Besides the ones I list on my profile, I own another six or so cameras.

I will say I'm incredibly thrilled with the capability of the HX400V. I took more photos today. Will post shortly. This camera has rejuvenated my photo taking ways. Feel like a young kid again.
 
I have owned several in the HX series, and used them all to great benefit for flexibility and zoom reach. If you have regular occasion for that extra zoom reach, you have a good cam for the purpose. Hope you enjoy using the 400.

I currently am using the RX10. I miss the reach the HX series has, but love the RX series IQ. Since I shoot "normal range" shots about 75% of the time in practical terms, I chose not to sacrifice IQ over zoom this go round.
 
Maybe I need to give the RX100 a look see. I wasn't aware of it until these recent posts. Shows you how active I am researching different cameras.

As I own a lot more cameras than I have admitted to, I suspect I'd be looking at a divorce if I started looking at another so soon. The demise of my pocket Nikon allowed me to get my foot in the door with the HX. Besides the ones I list on my profile, I own another six or so cameras.

I will say I'm incredibly thrilled with the capability of the HX400V. I took more photos today. Will post shortly. This camera has rejuvenated my photo taking ways. Feel like a young kid again.
 
I would edit Quicky422's last sentence and write ' the HX series has the reach, GPS and GPS logger to be a good choice for an all-in-one travel camera!'

So if IQ is paramount you will have to carry your higher IQ gear (DSLR+lenses for best IQ), defeating the "travelling Light", I am on vacation adage. For a lot of, 'I am on vacation' type photography the RX10 would certainly fit most of the requirements, but IMHO doesn't really have the reach and the IQ is okay for a 1" sensor, (definitely much better than the HX series up to 200mm), but not great.

So we are back to compromises and that is what the HX series and others like it are designed for, jack of all trades and master of none.
Well, I will admit that the HX400v is an excellent cam for getting telephoto shots, and even that the IQ of it is pretty good for overall viewing. Especially when shooter learns how to get the best from it. JUst IMO it is a cam to compliment other cams used by a shooter. I just don't think it is the right choice as an only cam to use.
Well, I guess my definition of a travel camera is a bit different and I was not trying to make a comparison between the two, OF COURSE, the m2 has better IQ!!

But that is why I own the 200 AND the 10M2!!!!! My ideal camera, for me, IMO, would be a merger of the 400 and 10M2 but we all know that's not physically possible at the moment!

The HX400V is a great all-in-one travel camera and I made that statement referring to the long reach to cover a lot of scenarios and the incorporation of GPS! I love GPS for traveling, hence a great all in one for travel!!!!

The RX10M2 is also a great travel camera, and may have superior IQ but has a lot less reach and NO GPS!

I will agree, IQ is top priority, that's why I made the move from the HX series, first to the RX10, and then RX10M2. I longed for a bigger sensor but didn't want to get into different lenses. And love the HX200 because of the longer zoom and GPS, so now I have two cameras that I carry with me most of the time!!

When I saw these pics from the HX400 I just had to reinforce my love for the HX series :)
 
I would edit Quicky422's last sentence and write ' the HX series has the reach, GPS and GPS logger to be a good choice for an all-in-one travel camera!'

So if IQ is paramount you will have to carry your higher IQ gear (DSLR+lenses for best IQ), defeating the "travelling Light", I am on vacation adage. For a lot of, 'I am on vacation' type photography the RX10 would certainly fit most of the requirements, but IMHO doesn't really have the reach and the IQ is okay for a 1" sensor, (definitely much better than the HX series up to 200mm), but not great.

So we are back to compromises and that is what the HX series and others like it are designed for, jack of all trades and master of none.
Well, I will admit that the HX400v is an excellent cam for getting telephoto shots, and even that the IQ of it is pretty good for overall viewing. Especially when shooter learns how to get the best from it. JUst IMO it is a cam to compliment other cams used by a shooter. I just don't think it is the right choice as an only cam to use.
Well, I guess my definition of a travel camera is a bit different and I was not trying to make a comparison between the two, OF COURSE, the m2 has better IQ!!

But that is why I own the 200 AND the 10M2!!!!! My ideal camera, for me, IMO, would be a merger of the 400 and 10M2 but we all know that's not physically possible at the moment!

The HX400V is a great all-in-one travel camera and I made that statement referring to the long reach to cover a lot of scenarios and the incorporation of GPS! I love GPS for traveling, hence a great all in one for travel!!!!

The RX10M2 is also a great travel camera, and may have superior IQ but has a lot less reach and NO GPS!

I will agree, IQ is top priority, that's why I made the move from the HX series, first to the RX10, and then RX10M2. I longed for a bigger sensor but didn't want to get into different lenses. And love the HX200 because of the longer zoom and GPS, so now I have two cameras that I carry with me most of the time!!

When I saw these pics from the HX400 I just had to reinforce my love for the HX series :)
GPS in a camera means nothing to me! Usually very slow. Buit Don't get me wrong..I am an avid fan of GPS embedded photos, so I carry a small Portable GPS Unit on my belt. Now I can embed GPS in any file from any camera! And it records log files so I can see everywhere I've gone on a trip



Map of the last trip I took in June 2015

Map of the last trip I took in June 2015



--
Wild Bill
Bill's Photos
 
I would edit Quicky422's last sentence and write ' the HX series has the reach, GPS and GPS logger to be a good choice for an all-in-one travel camera!'

So if IQ is paramount you will have to carry your higher IQ gear (DSLR+lenses for best IQ), defeating the "travelling Light", I am on vacation adage. For a lot of, 'I am on vacation' type photography the RX10 would certainly fit most of the requirements, but IMHO doesn't really have the reach and the IQ is okay for a 1" sensor, (definitely much better than the HX series up to 200mm), but not great.

So we are back to compromises and that is what the HX series and others like it are designed for, jack of all trades and master of none.
Well, I will admit that the HX400v is an excellent cam for getting telephoto shots, and even that the IQ of it is pretty good for overall viewing. Especially when shooter learns how to get the best from it. JUst IMO it is a cam to compliment other cams used by a shooter. I just don't think it is the right choice as an only cam to use.
Well, I guess my definition of a travel camera is a bit different and I was not trying to make a comparison between the two, OF COURSE, the m2 has better IQ!!

But that is why I own the 200 AND the 10M2!!!!! My ideal camera, for me, IMO, would be a merger of the 400 and 10M2 but we all know that's not physically possible at the moment!

The HX400V is a great all-in-one travel camera and I made that statement referring to the long reach to cover a lot of scenarios and the incorporation of GPS! I love GPS for traveling, hence a great all in one for travel!!!!

The RX10M2 is also a great travel camera, and may have superior IQ but has a lot less reach and NO GPS!

I will agree, IQ is top priority, that's why I made the move from the HX series, first to the RX10, and then RX10M2. I longed for a bigger sensor but didn't want to get into different lenses. And love the HX200 because of the longer zoom and GPS, so now I have two cameras that I carry with me most of the time!!

When I saw these pics from the HX400 I just had to reinforce my love for the HX series :)
GPS in a camera means nothing to me! Usually very slow. Buit Don't get me wrong..I am an avid fan of GPS embedded photos, so I carry a small Portable GPS Unit on my belt. Now I can embed GPS in any file from any camera! And it records log files so I can see everywhere I've gone on a trip

Map of the last trip I took in June 2015

Map of the last trip I took in June 2015
What a trip!! I see you went through Ft. Smith, AR and I'm just 1hr north from there!

My first experience with GPS integration was the HX100V and I loved it. Worked well for me and even included the direction you were standing when the shot was taken!! I had a lot of fun mapping my journey with pictures!!

I've had others make suggestions, like using a smart device, i.e. phone, to record GPS. Never thought you could wear just a GPS unit on your belt!!! It sounds like a great solution but just adds to the equipment list and then having to sync that info to the pictures, remembering which picture I took where, just too much for me. I really like the convenience of having it integrated!

I'm sure you took a lot of pictures and would like to know how you insert the GPS info into your pics? Do you do it for all of them or just a certain few? Thanks
 
I would edit Quicky422's last sentence and write ' the HX series has the reach, GPS and GPS logger to be a good choice for an all-in-one travel camera!'

So if IQ is paramount you will have to carry your higher IQ gear (DSLR+lenses for best IQ), defeating the "travelling Light", I am on vacation adage. For a lot of, 'I am on vacation' type photography the RX10 would certainly fit most of the requirements, but IMHO doesn't really have the reach and the IQ is okay for a 1" sensor, (definitely much better than the HX series up to 200mm), but not great.

So we are back to compromises and that is what the HX series and others like it are designed for, jack of all trades and master of none.
Well, I will admit that the HX400v is an excellent cam for getting telephoto shots, and even that the IQ of it is pretty good for overall viewing. Especially when shooter learns how to get the best from it. JUst IMO it is a cam to compliment other cams used by a shooter. I just don't think it is the right choice as an only cam to use.
Well, I guess my definition of a travel camera is a bit different and I was not trying to make a comparison between the two, OF COURSE, the m2 has better IQ!!

But that is why I own the 200 AND the 10M2!!!!! My ideal camera, for me, IMO, would be a merger of the 400 and 10M2 but we all know that's not physically possible at the moment!

The HX400V is a great all-in-one travel camera and I made that statement referring to the long reach to cover a lot of scenarios and the incorporation of GPS! I love GPS for traveling, hence a great all in one for travel!!!!

The RX10M2 is also a great travel camera, and may have superior IQ but has a lot less reach and NO GPS!

I will agree, IQ is top priority, that's why I made the move from the HX series, first to the RX10, and then RX10M2. I longed for a bigger sensor but didn't want to get into different lenses. And love the HX200 because of the longer zoom and GPS, so now I have two cameras that I carry with me most of the time!!

When I saw these pics from the HX400 I just had to reinforce my love for the HX series :)
GPS in a camera means nothing to me! Usually very slow. Buit Don't get me wrong..I am an avid fan of GPS embedded photos, so I carry a small Portable GPS Unit on my belt. Now I can embed GPS in any file from any camera! And it records log files so I can see everywhere I've gone on a trip

Map of the last trip I took in June 2015

Map of the last trip I took in June 2015
What a trip!! I see you went through Ft. Smith, AR and I'm just 1hr north from there!

My first experience with GPS integration was the HX100V and I loved it. Worked well for me and even included the direction you were standing when the shot was taken!! I had a lot of fun mapping my journey with pictures!!

I've had others make suggestions, like using a smart device, i.e. phone, to record GPS. Never thought you could wear just a GPS unit on your belt!!! It sounds like a great solution but just adds to the equipment list and then having to sync that info to the pictures, remembering which picture I took where, just too much for me. I really like the convenience of having it integrated!

I'm sure you took a lot of pictures and would like to know how you insert the GPS info into your pics? Do you do it for all of them or just a certain few? Thanks
I embed it in all of them. Unit has to be set to same time as cameras to sync. Unit comes with program to sync files but I prefer to use breezebrowser pro to do it. So all I do is turn unit on as soon as I get in my van and turn off when I get to my last destination of the day. then upload log file to puter, upload any photos from all cameras and then tell program to embed gps in all photos. that's it. At same time program make the map and IF I want the full trip map I have to copy paste each days log file together in a txt file and then change txt to log and it will now make the full map. The unit is a sony t is discontinued now but any protable gps unit that creates log files will work.

--
Wild Bill
Bill's Photos
 
I would edit Quicky422's last sentence and write ' the HX series has the reach, GPS and GPS logger to be a good choice for an all-in-one travel camera!'

So if IQ is paramount you will have to carry your higher IQ gear (DSLR+lenses for best IQ), defeating the "travelling Light", I am on vacation adage. For a lot of, 'I am on vacation' type photography the RX10 would certainly fit most of the requirements, but IMHO doesn't really have the reach and the IQ is okay for a 1" sensor, (definitely much better than the HX series up to 200mm), but not great.

So we are back to compromises and that is what the HX series and others like it are designed for, jack of all trades and master of none.
Well, I will admit that the HX400v is an excellent cam for getting telephoto shots, and even that the IQ of it is pretty good for overall viewing. Especially when shooter learns how to get the best from it. JUst IMO it is a cam to compliment other cams used by a shooter. I just don't think it is the right choice as an only cam to use.
Well, I guess my definition of a travel camera is a bit different and I was not trying to make a comparison between the two, OF COURSE, the m2 has better IQ!!

But that is why I own the 200 AND the 10M2!!!!! My ideal camera, for me, IMO, would be a merger of the 400 and 10M2 but we all know that's not physically possible at the moment!

The HX400V is a great all-in-one travel camera and I made that statement referring to the long reach to cover a lot of scenarios and the incorporation of GPS! I love GPS for traveling, hence a great all in one for travel!!!!

The RX10M2 is also a great travel camera, and may have superior IQ but has a lot less reach and NO GPS!

I will agree, IQ is top priority, that's why I made the move from the HX series, first to the RX10, and then RX10M2. I longed for a bigger sensor but didn't want to get into different lenses. And love the HX200 because of the longer zoom and GPS, so now I have two cameras that I carry with me most of the time!!

When I saw these pics from the HX400 I just had to reinforce my love for the HX series :)
GPS in a camera means nothing to me! Usually very slow. Buit Don't get me wrong..I am an avid fan of GPS embedded photos, so I carry a small Portable GPS Unit on my belt. Now I can embed GPS in any file from any camera! And it records log files so I can see everywhere I've gone on a trip

Map of the last trip I took in June 2015

Map of the last trip I took in June 2015
What a trip!! I see you went through Ft. Smith, AR and I'm just 1hr north from there!

My first experience with GPS integration was the HX100V and I loved it. Worked well for me and even included the direction you were standing when the shot was taken!! I had a lot of fun mapping my journey with pictures!!

I've had others make suggestions, like using a smart device, i.e. phone, to record GPS. Never thought you could wear just a GPS unit on your belt!!! It sounds like a great solution but just adds to the equipment list and then having to sync that info to the pictures, remembering which picture I took where, just too much for me. I really like the convenience of having it integrated!

I'm sure you took a lot of pictures and would like to know how you insert the GPS info into your pics? Do you do it for all of them or just a certain few? Thanks
I embed it in all of them. Unit has to be set to same time as cameras to sync. Unit comes with program to sync files but I prefer to use breezebrowser pro to do it. So all I do is turn unit on as soon as I get in my van and turn off when I get to my last destination of the day. then upload log file to puter, upload any photos from all cameras and then tell program to embed gps in all photos. that's it. At same time program make the map and IF I want the full trip map I have to copy paste each days log file together in a txt file and then change txt to log and it will now make the full map. The unit is a sony t is discontinued now but any protable gps unit that creates log files will work.

--
Wild Bill
Bill's Photos
Wow!, I never knew!!! Didn't think about the timestamp sync either! I'll have to look into a small GPS that I can use with the RX10m2. Maybe I can get a used Sony? I will look into this!

Thanks Bill, for taking the time to post!
 
I had to do a bit traveling and was unable to take many photos with the HX, but I did manage to find a electronic store, MEDIA, in Cluj, Romania that sold camera filters. They didn't have HOYA filters, but I did manage to pick up a Hama 360 coated UV filter. Hama is German and a fairly good filter in it's own right.

Apparently there is a debate by some whether a filter should be used on digital cameras. I did take the time to shoot two photos. One without the filter and another with with this Hama filter. In removing the filter I managed to jostle the camera a bit on the tripod (I left the stabilizer on for both shots), so there will be a very slight difference in composition. I manually refocused on the Marygolds, individually for both shots.

Fact check - I've normally always used filters and am a big believer in them. ...but having been an educator for many years I like to believe I'm always willing to learn.

I blew both shots up in Photoshop CC looking for differences in resolution/distortion. Couldn't find any. I did find a slight difference in some reflections and color contrast. The filtered shot seemed to subtly remove some reflection and add some contrast (particularly in green color).

Afterwards I did search the Internet and found a YouTube test of HOYA filters.
. According to this YouTube test the UV filter apparently does help a lens for flare and reflections (ghosting). They go on to state the big benefit is with damage control for the lens.I warn you their test does get a bit dramatic.

Traveling in Texas, I normally carry an Olympus E-P (with filter) in the side pocket of my car door. I do this so I'm always ready for an elusive photo shot. One day, opening the car door, the camera slipped from my hand and hit filter first on the cement road. There was serious damage to the filter - none of any note to the lens.

Here is my first photo with the Hama UV filter:

b500c35dc08f4fe8ac71123b112e5ece.jpg

Here is the subsequent photo without a UV filter.

70ec26819f4f4c07a645ba3e26873dd6.jpg

--
D.Patrick, MBA, MA, USA Ret
 
I failed to mention that the person doing testing in the YouTube clip indicates that the filter will take away from the nature of the lens - given the lens' original design. The tester also indicates he prefers to take photos without using a filter - he says it depends on how big a clutz you are.
 
Here is my first photo with the Hama UV filter.
I'm in the "no protective filter" camp myself. I do use one on rare occasions in the right conditions though (ie blowing sand/spray). I like the B+W MRC line (have their ND and polarizing filters also). Note: stay away from their close-up lenses.

It's a pretty well-established fact that filters can only contribute to flare and veiling glare, and can impact color and/or contrast (not to mention sharpness and bokeh if you get a cheap one). You'll also see the occasional thread where folks have experienced autofocus issues that were caused by a protective filter. I feel that filters are like any other tool: use them when you need them.

Camera and lens manufacturers go to great lengths to incorporate design elements that reduce flare, veiling glare, ghosting, and internal reflections, including those caused by reflections off of the highly reflective sensors themselves. Aspherical lens elements, special coatings, and even meniscus elements are often included to counter this. Adding two more (perfectly flat) glass/air surfaces can have detrimental effects OTOH.

Now I don't begrudge you the use of a protective filter all the time. Everyone has to do their own risk assessment. And any IQ impacts may reside in the completely acceptable realm.

Note: if you're testing for flare resistance, try some shots toward a light source.

Happy shooting! Enjoy the new cam.

R2

--
Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judg
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top