For me, I don't care about video one bit, I never use it. I have not found any problem with low light shooting with mk III and have no intention of moving to the new camera. There is not enough to justify a change. I did change from the Mk I to the three for the viewfinder.
I agree with all, except the part about low light. I find it hard to believe. rx100m3 does well in low light, but to say that there is no single problem - is exaggeration. I find that for example indoors I have to often go as high as ISO3200 - and that is not so good, pics are noisy. I would limit low light to ISO800 or ISO1600 as max to get more or less clean pictures. But in that case shutter speed drops to low - 1/15 or so - that is unacceptable for shooting people. The only way to save the moment is flash - but I can't use flash in all situations, besides I don't like the photos that come out using flash (including bounce mode). So not good enough. If it was good enough for low light - people won't buy A7s and would stay with rx100m3 and all successor cameras like rx100m4 etc - will be unneeded. We all know it is not the case. Yes, we need better low light - we meed cleaner high ISO - exactly the thing that rx100m4 failed to provide so far. Hopefully reviews will come soon and we will see at least some improvements.
P.S. And EVF is the last feature I personally want in such portable cameras like rx100. Much useful feature would be longer range of lens