Is there a going to be be a big difference between rx100m3 and rx100m4?

Sush15

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
396
Reaction score
56
Location
New York, NY, US
I understand the major upgrade is on video side. I rarely do any video. Is the new sensor going to show a big difference in still images? better/cleaner high ISO shots? I'm interested in seeing if low light no flash photos are improved with new sensor.
 
I understand the major upgrade is on video side. I rarely do any video. Is the new sensor going to show a big difference in still images? better/cleaner high ISO shots? I'm interested in seeing if low light no flash photos are improved with new sensor.
If there was going to be a significant improvement in image quality (ISO performance, dynamic range) Sony would have said something about it. But their press release mentioned nothing in this regard - only performance improvements (fast sensor readout for full sensor 4K, high shutter speeds and frame rates, high burst rates). So I wouldn't be expecting anything.
 
I understand the major upgrade is on video side. I rarely do any video. Is the new sensor going to show a big difference in still images? better/cleaner high ISO shots? I'm interested in seeing if low light no flash photos are improved with new sensor.
If there was going to be a significant improvement in image quality (ISO performance, dynamic range) Sony would have said something about it. But their press release mentioned nothing in this regard - only performance improvements (fast sensor readout for full sensor 4K, high shutter speeds and frame rates, high burst rates). So I wouldn't be expecting anything.
There may be some differences if the jpeg processing engine is different from the previous models. There have been remarks of over enthusiastic noise removal by the processor leaving artefacts on very close examination. Of course if shooting raw this may not be a problem.


Dave. (UK)
 
No one knows. Everything at this point is speculation. Do you want to make a purchase decision based off speculation? All we have to do is wait about 30 days and there will be plenty of reviews to dig through.
 
Found this online as I was trying to find info regarding this new sensor.

http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news_archives/img/pdf/vol_68/sideview_vol68.pdf
That's a 2011 article - it's been 4 years since. Eternity in technology terms. Sony used same picture with birthday cake many times and yet I don't see any users saying that their rx100m2 can do perfect stills in such dark conditions with those "RGBW" magical coding ;)

It's all BS. I'll wait for reviews and if rx100m4 will have some improvements in low light - even 1/3 stop would be enough for me - then I'll buy it. If it's going to be same - meh.....
 
No one knows. Everything at this point is speculation. Do you want to make a purchase decision based off speculation? All we have to do is wait about 30 days and there will be plenty of reviews to dig through.
30 days is a month! That's too long. Many people can't wait that long. They have to plan purchase ahead, especially that price is $1000 and not $150. Summer is not going to last long, folsk have plans and vacations and trips planned. If they are not going to know ahead what rx100m4 is going to give them - then it's all useless. Might as well wait for next summer and next rx100m5 then.

A7RII hands on reports are already coming in. So why is rx100m4 any different for us to wait another 30 days? That's unacceptable. Time is of essence nowadays. Sony has played us enough keeping us waiting in darkness and no info on what to expect before they announced new cameras. That alone cost some big money already - since many folks lost hope and bought other cameras. yes, only because Sony was arrogant enough to not tell us what to expect in advance. Like they could have done 2-3 month ago. So that everyone would waited knowing what's coming. Now Sony finally announced something, but it's too late, too little. And if no reviews will come within a 3-4 days from now - then sales are not going to hit high marks.
 
Last edited:
For me, I don't care about video one bit, I never use it. I have not found any problem with low light shooting with mk III and have no intention of moving to the new camera. There is not enough to justify a change. I did change from the Mk I to the three for the viewfinder.
 
Last edited:
[No message]
 
Found this online as I was trying to find info regarding this new sensor.

http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news_archives/img/pdf/vol_68/sideview_vol68.pdf
That's a 2011 article - it's been 4 years since. Eternity in technology terms. Sony used same picture with birthday cake many times and yet I don't see any users saying that their rx100m2 can do perfect stills in such dark conditions with those "RGBW" magical coding ;)

It's all BS. I'll wait for reviews and if rx100m4 will have some improvements in low light - even 1/3 stop would be enough for me - then I'll buy it. If it's going to be same - meh.....
I would but m4 for improvements in low light as well. Though I rarely have complaints with m3
 
For me, I don't care about video one bit, I never use it. I have not found any problem with low light shooting with mk III and have no intention of moving to the new camera. There is not enough to justify a change. I did change from the Mk I to the three for the viewfinder.
I agree with all, except the part about low light. I find it hard to believe. rx100m3 does well in low light, but to say that there is no single problem - is exaggeration. I find that for example indoors I have to often go as high as ISO3200 - and that is not so good, pics are noisy. I would limit low light to ISO800 or ISO1600 as max to get more or less clean pictures. But in that case shutter speed drops to low - 1/15 or so - that is unacceptable for shooting people. The only way to save the moment is flash - but I can't use flash in all situations, besides I don't like the photos that come out using flash (including bounce mode). So not good enough. If it was good enough for low light - people won't buy A7s and would stay with rx100m3 and all successor cameras like rx100m4 etc - will be unneeded. We all know it is not the case. Yes, we need better low light - we meed cleaner high ISO - exactly the thing that rx100m4 failed to provide so far. Hopefully reviews will come soon and we will see at least some improvements.

P.S. And EVF is the last feature I personally want in such portable cameras like rx100. Much useful feature would be longer range of lens or better jpeg engine.
 
Last edited:
For me, I don't care about video one bit, I never use it. I have not found any problem with low light shooting with mk III and have no intention of moving to the new camera. There is not enough to justify a change. I did change from the Mk I to the three for the viewfinder.
I agree with all, except the part about low light. I find it hard to believe. rx100m3 does well in low light, but to say that there is no single problem - is exaggeration. I find that for example indoors I have to often go as high as ISO3200 - and that is not so good, pics are noisy. I would limit low light to ISO800 or ISO1600 as max to get more or less clean pictures. But in that case shutter speed drops to low - 1/15 or so - that is unacceptable for shooting people. The only way to save the moment is flash - but I can't use flash in all situations, besides I don't like the photos that come out using flash (including bounce mode). So not good enough. If it was good enough for low light - people won't buy A7s and would stay with rx100m3 and all successor cameras like rx100m4 etc - will be unneeded. We all know it is not the case. Yes, we need better low light - we meed cleaner high ISO - exactly the thing that rx100m4 failed to provide so far. Hopefully reviews will come soon and we will see at least some improvements.
From what you've said it's pretty clear that no 1" sensor camera is going to give you the ISO performance you desire. So don't get you hopes up about the RX100M4.

I don't understand your aversion to even a little bounce flash indoors though. Indoor light is usually terrible in both quantity and quality. How can adding a bit bounce flash as a little fill light not help? I use bounce flash all the time on my RX100M3 with great results.
 
No one knows. Everything at this point is speculation. Do you want to make a purchase decision based off speculation? All we have to do is wait about 30 days and there will be plenty of reviews to dig through.
30 days is a month! That's too long. Many people can't wait that long. They have to plan purchase ahead, especially that price is $1000 and not $150. Summer is not going to last long, folsk have plans and vacations and trips planned. If they are not going to know ahead what rx100m4 is going to give them - then it's all useless. Might as well wait for next summer and next rx100m5 then.
He said 30 days for 'plenty of reviews'. You'll see plenty of samples and early reviews before then. Thorough reviews like the ones that DPR do though take about 2 weeks.
A7RII hands on reports are already coming in. So why is rx100m4 any different for us to wait another 30 days? That's unacceptable. Time is of essence nowadays. Sony has played us enough keeping us waiting in darkness and no info on what to expect before they announced new cameras. That alone cost some big money already - since many folks lost hope and bought other cameras. yes, only because Sony was arrogant enough to not tell us what to expect in advance. Like they could have done 2-3 month ago. So that everyone would waited knowing what's coming. Now Sony finally announced something, but it's too late, too little. And if no reviews will come within a 3-4 days from now - then sales are not going to hit high marks.
Sony has told us exactly what to expect - they held a press conference and issued a press release. A sensor with faster readout that gives the RX100M4 full sensor 4K, high frame rates, burst rates and shutter speeds.

They haven't told us there will be improved ISO performance or dynamic range, so don't expect any.
 
No one knows. Everything at this point is speculation. Do you want to make a purchase decision based off speculation? All we have to do is wait about 30 days and there will be plenty of reviews to dig through.
30 days is a month! That's too long. Many people can't wait that long. They have to plan purchase ahead, especially that price is $1000 and not $150. Summer is not going to last long, folsk have plans and vacations and trips planned. If they are not going to know ahead what rx100m4 is going to give them - then it's all useless. Might as well wait for next summer and next rx100m5 then.
He said 30 days for 'plenty of reviews'. You'll see plenty of samples and early reviews before then. Thorough reviews like the ones that DPR do though take about 2 weeks.
A7RII hands on reports are already coming in. So why is rx100m4 any different for us to wait another 30 days? That's unacceptable. Time is of essence nowadays. Sony has played us enough keeping us waiting in darkness and no info on what to expect before they announced new cameras. That alone cost some big money already - since many folks lost hope and bought other cameras. yes, only because Sony was arrogant enough to not tell us what to expect in advance. Like they could have done 2-3 month ago. So that everyone would waited knowing what's coming. Now Sony finally announced something, but it's too late, too little. And if no reviews will come within a 3-4 days from now - then sales are not going to hit high marks.
Sony has told us exactly what to expect - they held a press conference and issued a press release. A sensor with faster readout that gives the RX100M4 full sensor 4K, high frame rates, burst rates and shutter speeds.

They haven't told us there will be improved ISO performance or dynamic range, so don't expect any.
The only clue we have AT ALL about improved performance with the new stacked sensor regarding sensitivity is the lower number on the non-expanded iso range, which we assume is the base ISO. Current sensor base is 125, new camera is 100 (maybe!) So, it might be 1/3 stop better vs the current sensor.
 
Using a stacked chip design for a camera sensor is really a big deal and has great potential ramifications. Initially, however, Sony is playing it safe -- only separating the imager from the logic circuitry, which is why the improvements offered in the M4 are somewhat conservative.

Down the road, however, Sony will have the option of either increasing the number of pixels in its 1" sensor or increasing their size (I hope they opt for the latter). Then such enhancements as greater light sensitivity, etc. will be easily realized.

And so, let me add my name to the chorus "I can't wait for the M5!).
 
No one knows. Everything at this point is speculation. Do you want to make a purchase decision based off speculation? All we have to do is wait about 30 days and there will be plenty of reviews to dig through.
30 days is a month! That's too long. Many people can't wait that long. They have to plan purchase ahead, especially that price is $1000 and not $150. Summer is not going to last long, folsk have plans and vacations and trips planned. If they are not going to know ahead what rx100m4 is going to give them - then it's all useless. Might as well wait for next summer and next rx100m5 then.
He said 30 days for 'plenty of reviews'. You'll see plenty of samples and early reviews before then. Thorough reviews like the ones that DPR do though take about 2 weeks.
That would be wonderful!
A7RII hands on reports are already coming in. So why is rx100m4 any different for us to wait another 30 days? That's unacceptable. Time is of essence nowadays. Sony has played us enough keeping us waiting in darkness and no info on what to expect before they announced new cameras. That alone cost some big money already - since many folks lost hope and bought other cameras. yes, only because Sony was arrogant enough to not tell us what to expect in advance. Like they could have done 2-3 month ago. So that everyone would waited knowing what's coming. Now Sony finally announced something, but it's too late, too little. And if no reviews will come within a 3-4 days from now - then sales are not going to hit high marks.
Sony has told us exactly what to expect - they held a press conference and issued a press release. A sensor with faster readout that gives the RX100M4 full sensor 4K, high frame rates, burst rates and shutter speeds.

They haven't told us there will be improved ISO performance or dynamic range, so don't expect any.
See that's where I disagree. Sony is playing a hide and seek game recently. Take A7RII - they haven't told about increase of ISO either. They focused on 4K, resolution, 5-axis IBIS, 399 AF points, readout speed etc. However, reports already indicate about +1 stop! increase. It may be that ISO will be + 1/3 speed better. That's enough to convince some users to upgrade and other users to buy it. That's a 1/3 more light for each picture.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
He said 30 days for 'plenty of reviews'. You'll see plenty of samples and early reviews before then. Thorough reviews like the ones that DPR do though take about 2 weeks.
That would be wonderful!
The RX100M4 is showing as shipping on 3 July from B&H, so only about 2 weeks before you'll see plenty of user reports too.

They haven't told us there will be improved ISO performance or dynamic range, so don't expect any.
See that's where I disagree. Sony is playing a hide and seek game recently. Take A7RII - they haven't told about increase of ISO either. They focused on 4K, resolution, 5-axis IBIS, 399 AF points, readout speed etc. However, reports already indicate about +1 stop! increase. It may be that ISO will be + 1/3 speed better. That's enough to convince some users to upgrade and other users to buy it. That's a 1/3 more light for each picture.
The difference is that A7RII got a BSI sensor, technology that is know to improve ISO performance. Sony also mention it a number of times in their press release for the A7RII - they mention "high sensitivity" on four occasions and "low noise" twice.

So Sony have clearly signaled better ISO performance on the A7RII. Not such indication for the RX10M2 and RX100M4.
 
For me, I don't care about video one bit, I never use it. I have not found any problem with low light shooting with mk III and have no intention of moving to the new camera. There is not enough to justify a change. I did change from the Mk I to the three for the viewfinder.
I agree with all, except the part about low light. I find it hard to believe. rx100m3 does well in low light, but to say that there is no single problem - is exaggeration. I find that for example indoors I have to often go as high as ISO3200 - and that is not so good, pics are noisy. I would limit low light to ISO800 or ISO1600 as max to get more or less clean pictures. But in that case shutter speed drops to low - 1/15 or so - that is unacceptable for shooting people. The only way to save the moment is flash - but I can't use flash in all situations, besides I don't like the photos that come out using flash (including bounce mode). So not good enough. If it was good enough for low light - people won't buy A7s and would stay with rx100m3 and all successor cameras like rx100m4 etc - will be unneeded. We all know it is not the case. Yes, we need better low light - we meed cleaner high ISO - exactly the thing that rx100m4 failed to provide so far. Hopefully reviews will come soon and we will see at least some improvements.

P.S. And EVF is the last feature I personally want in such portable cameras like rx100. Much useful feature would be longer range of lens
thank you, sir. Well stated.

or better jpeg engine.
 
P.S. And EVF is the last feature I personally want in such portable cameras like rx100. Much useful feature would be longer range of lens or better jpeg engine.
RX100 I, RX100 II, Canon G7X - all have longer lenses and no EVF. It's not like you don't have other choices. That's the great thing about Sony keeping the older RX100's on the market.

The problem is, putting a longer lens on a pocket camera with a large-ish sensor is a challenge. The RX100 III (and presumable IV as it has the same lens) has the sharpest lens across the range, but in doing so has sacrificed range. The RX100 I and II go to 100mm but is slow at f/4.9. The G7X is fast at 100mm, but compromised at wide angles.

Take your pick on which set of compromises you prefer.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top