I'm not basing this on a video! I wouldn't make such claims based on just viewing a video as you did.
You going to be alright? Need a tissue? I don't feel bad for you, you paid for a product and got said product. You still have access to said product.
Until others can test this themselves, I'll say again, no, you can't get the same results the 'old way', this new technology doesn't exist in the current toolset.
Agreed although I have to ask, why has the topic gone OT from the new DeHaze filter?
I am allright. I still have cs6 creative suite and i will buy supplemental software. Not going into the subscription trap. As i need more then just Photoshop and Lightroom, it's way more expensive for me. Looking for alternatives.
I think he don't need explanation.
I was going to say the same thing. In fact, I took a screenshot of the before image in the video and very quickly created a very similar effect in LR 5. If I had access to the original file I probably could have created the same exact look. Adobe should be focusing on more meaningful improvements to LR 6, especially considering its less than perfect state with existing and newly added tools.
PURE speculation, you don't have access to the new feature, and you really don't have a clue about what you're suggesting!
All companies find ways to entice their customers to spend money with them. That is just business 101. I am not going to get into the Adobe argument too far since it has been one of those arguments that I have been on both sides of the fence on. I used to be pretty adamant about refusing to go with the subscription model, but I finally drank the cool aide, and I have to say, now that I have, I am much less stressed about the whole issue. I think I wasted more energy and strife fighting the system for the sake of fighting it than anything else.
LOL. It's a just a slider. The demo video showed what it does. If I was able to very quickly get near identical results with just a very low quality screenshot of the first image that he worked with then it is very likely I could get even better results with the original high quality file. That's just common sense. Your defensiveness about this tool is odd, considering that.
LOL, that's kind of an idiotic statement considering LR is filled with sliders!
Wrong! You neither have the raw data or the software with the slider. You're way off base but when the product ships, you'll see that your so called testing has no merit.
It's really the opposite of common sense for all the reasons I've outlined above!
Your missing the point. The point is, there are no other adjustments to that slider. He showed what was happening when you used it.
Obviously. As I said, I was able to get near identical with results with Lightroom 5 with just a very low quality screen shot of the unedited image.
How am I way off base if I got near indentical results?
And yet, I was able to get near identical results.
What experience is that?
--
