Reading mode: Light Dark

Differences between d7200 & d750 ?

Go to last post
i get your point .

but for me , i lean to the d750 now more , because of the low-light capability .

in fact , i need that feature more then bigger DOF since i don't shoot wildlife and long zoom shots .

thanks for your help , other advices are appreciate :)
 
as opposite of you , i don't shoot wildlife , and i'll not :)

seems the d750 will be my final choice , since i don't need that reach of DOF and i need low light features more as high ISO , -3ev focusing , and i want that group AF and the face detection in view finder .

thanks for your help , other advices are appreciate :)
 
wassim al malak said:
...

but what i didn't know is which one produce the better image .

...

after a lot of readings , i came more confused , someone said the d7200 has the sharper most detailed pic. (due to its 24mp in crop sensor) and other said NO , the d750 has .
Click to expand...
If you cannot get close enough to your subject to fill the frame with it, then a crop sensor of the same pixel count will put more pixels on the subject, so the crop sensor is more likely to give you a sharp image of your subject. However, if you can get close enough to the subject to fill the frame with the subject, than the FF will probably give you the sharper picture because the pixels are farther apart but at the same flange distance. For this reason, crop sensor cameras are often the choice for distant subjects (e.g. wildlife) but FF will give better results for most other subject types.

The FF will give you the option to reduce noise and DOF while increasing DR.
 
that's very helpful .

since i indoor events , landscapes , family often in low light , the FF will help more .

is that right ?
 
RemcoDo said:
wassim al malak said:
thanks for replying ,

i know everything about those two cameras spec.

but what i didn't know is which one produce the better image .

since i just have a DX , i can't really know the difference between it and the FX .

after a lot of readings , i came more confused , someone said the d7200 has the sharper most detailed pic. (due to its 24mp in crop sensor) and other said NO , the d750 has .
Click to expand...
What Hans was telling you, you are comparing a DX with a FX. Both cameras have their advantages and disadvantages. You choose a FX because of the FX advantages.

If detail is your own concern, choose the DX because you got more DOF on it so in your observation more detail.
Click to expand...
I agree with Hans. Two different formats. DX basically for DOF and up to ISO 1600 without noise pics. The FX is much better for wide shots and no problem to increase ISO up to 3200-6400.

You are asking which one produce better images and the answer is simple : none, but whoever is behind the wheel. Most important thing is to have very good lenses than the camera. If you are looking to shoot wild nature, then the D7200 is probably your camera. If you are shooting indoor sport, the D750 will provide better results ( because of its ISO capabilities ). That is why, some people have both formats so they are able to handle different type of photography.

What type of photography you do ? Personally, I had the D300 for 7 years. Sold it and I got now the D750 ( because I shoot weddings ) but I will buy the D7200 to shoot wild nature with my 80-400 AF-S ED VR so instead having 400 mm, it will be 600. For indoor I will use my D750 with my 70-200 f/4 VR. Probably this help you.

Best regards
 
thanks for your notes , sure you're helping a lot .

i was confused about the IQ issue between those two , but now i'm pretty sure what i really need .

i need the d750 , because i shoot indoors and often low light situations .

i think i'll go with the d750 with 24-120 f4 and tamron 15-30 f2.8 vc and sigma 50 f1.4 with a sb-700 .

that will satisfy all my needs since i don't shoot wildlife or sports .

any other advices are appreciated .
 
wassim al malak said:
thanks for your notes , sure you're helping a lot .

i was confused about the IQ issue between those two , but now i'm pretty sure what i really need .

i need the d750 , because i shoot indoors and often low light situations .

i think i'll go with the d750 with 24-120 f4 and tamron 15-30 f2.8 vc and sigma 50 f1.4 with a sb-700 .

that will satisfy all my needs since i don't shoot wildlife or sports .

any other advices are appreciated .
Click to expand...
Are you using the 15-30 inside as well? You are used to your 18-55 on your DX. The equivalent is the 24-70 on FX.
 
Good choices and good conclusion.

Affordability would be the next concern. Just make sure you're not taking a loan to get all that gear. You'll end up working more and shooting less to pay it off ;)

Also, to those saying that the APSC D7200 has the same dynamic range (or even better?) than the D750, that's simply not true. I don't know what methodology DxO uses, but I've played with both the D750 and D7100. I can definitely pull up less noisy shadows and pull down highlights with the Full-Frame than with any crop sensor. I've done the same with Crop sensors, but the shadows were too noisy to use. To me, practical dynamic range is better. Is it hundreds of dollars better? That's up to your skill set and wallet to decide. Some people train themselves to take the perfect exposure for any given setting, so don't need to use as much latitude. But its always nice to have options :)
 
i really will go with the 24-120 kit and the tamron 15-30 ,

i really need and like the UWA more :)
 
thank you for your helpful notes .

for me , i prefer to shoot the right exposure as i can and take all the power of the gear and at the end edit less , i hate editing , i love my pure raw files more then the editing files , the raw one is my experience and the editing one the is the software power :)

a lot may disagree , but that what i love , i understand photography like this and i'm happy with that .

so i agree with you about that DR issue .

about the money , yes it's expensive , BUT i'll live only once , why don't i enjoy what i love ?
 
Random Photographer said:
Also, to those saying that the APSC D7200 has the same dynamic range (or even better?) than the D750, that's simply not true. I don't know what methodology DxO uses, but I've played with both the D750 and D7100. I can definitely pull up less noisy shadows and pull down highlights with the Full-Frame than with any crop sensor. I've done the same with Crop sensors, but the shadows were too noisy to use. To me, practical dynamic range is better. Is it hundreds of dollars better? That's up to your skill set and wallet to decide. Some people train themselves to take the perfect exposure for any given setting, so don't need to use as much latitude. But its always nice to have options :)
Click to expand...
I don't know either what methodology DxO uses and I don't have a D750, but I can show you this:

This image was taken 5 stops underexposed @ISO 100 with the D7200 (exif says D5300 as I took the image when ACR could not develop D7200 files yet and I had to use the exif trick):





I then pushed it 5 stops (equivalent of ISO 3200) in the latest ACR that is compatible with the D7200 and got this, see original for 100%:



Seems pretty amazing to me while there's no unusable noise in the shadows.

--
Philip
 
Last edited:
wassim al malak said:
thanks for your help ,

i really don't care about the reach of DOF of the d7200 because i don't shoot birds or wildlife .

i often shoot in low light , or landscapes in day light , so seems like the d750 will be my final word , even the budget !

hwo want thing , must pay for it :)
Click to expand...
If you go with the D750, you could always use the new Nikon FX 24-85mm VR lens (new or used around $400) which has good reviews for sharpness, lower priced than many other FX lens, and then add more lens as you go.

Or if you buying D750 go with 24-120mm VR as combo for best deal on this lens when bought together new. It may be expensive, but it will last years with great photos.
 
sure it is .

awesome !
 
sure , i'll get the d750 with 24-120 f4 then the tamron 15-30 f2.8 vc , a 50m f1.8 and a sb-700 .
 
That is really excellent, makes you appreciate how far digital camera tech has evolved. Though, I don't doubt the results and for many, the quality obtained by the D7200 is excellent (I loved my a6000 99% of the time), there are simply things you obtain with the full frame that you physically can't get on smaller crop sensors. The need for those specialized abilities dictates the specialized price.

I just put it simply as this. A Full Frame can do everything a Crop sensor can do (with sometimes heavier lenses of course), but a crop can't do everything a full frame can't. Again factors like controls and ergonomics also come into play. That's why its always nice to have options. But I believe that the D750 is the perfect balance of price, ergonomicss, and quality, which is finally nice to have.

Random
 
Flashlight said:
Random Photographer said:
Also, to those saying that the APSC D7200 has the same dynamic range (or even better?) than the D750, that's simply not true. I don't know what methodology DxO uses, but I've played with both the D750 and D7100. I can definitely pull up less noisy shadows and pull down highlights with the Full-Frame than with any crop sensor. I've done the same with Crop sensors, but the shadows were too noisy to use. To me, practical dynamic range is better. Is it hundreds of dollars better? That's up to your skill set and wallet to decide. Some people train themselves to take the perfect exposure for any given setting, so don't need to use as much latitude. But its always nice to have options :)
Click to expand...
I don't know either what methodology DxO uses and I don't have a D750, but I can show you this:

This image was taken 5 stops underexposed @ISO 100 with the D7200 (exif says D5300 as I took the image when ACR could not develop D7200 files yet and I had to use the exif trick):



I then pushed it 5 stops (equivalent of ISO 3200) in the latest ACR that is compatible with the D7200 and got this, see original for 100%:



Seems pretty amazing to me while there's no unusable noise in the shadows.

--
Philip
Click to expand...


That is impressive at iso100. At a much higher iso the results for the D750 will be superior to the D7200 that far underexposed.

--
Lora
Profile is wrong, I've been on Dpreview since June 2006.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top