Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I had to tour the world with my K-3 and just one of my current lenses, it would be the DA* 60-250mm. It has been by far my used lens for several years. ("Travel lens" is usually used for a superzoom though, something that can serve as the one-and-only while you're traveling. I'm sure some would use it for traveling, but most would prefer to have more tele available.Maybe General Purpose or Travel Lens would be a better terminology Barry
Yes you are right EHD but the 16-85 does very well.
I've seen this Pentax lens referred to as a "kit" lens a couple of times.Thanks Dean for posting these shots, very close indeed. The 16-85mm will become one of the best "kit zoom" of Pentax and maybe of it's kind compared to the Canon 15-85mm and Nikon 16-85mm ! I know it's better than the Canon 15-85mm because I did owned it when I was shooting mostly Canon the last 2 years.
I've always assumed that a "kit lens" was a lens sold with a body to make a "ready to go" starter kit. Typically such a lens would be fairly cheap, because otherwise it would make the camera appear more expensive, and anyone willing to pay lots for it is likely to want to be a bit choosy with the camera + lens combination.
I've never thought of the term as meaning simply "any mid-range zoom". For example, I've never thought of my DA 17-70mm f/4 as a kit lens, yet I've seen that cheaper than the DA 16-85mm. And (perhaps I've missed something) I haven't yet seen the DA 16-85mm sold as part of a camera+lens kit.
Am I missing something? Has the terminology changed while I haven't been paying attention?