merengues
Leading Member
# 3 is sharpest but # 1 is my choice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The cord is a necessary safety measureIt was between 3 and 1 for me--picked 3. I liked the higher contrast in 1, but overall there is a better balance in 3, and I liked that you can make out the plant leaves more in 3 for some context and interesting shapes against the couch texture, and an overall balance of light and color. When a background is blurred enough to be unrecognizable, it should make sense for the composition or color balance, and in this case I think the shots where the green is too blurred are not as balanced. Also the cord is distracting![]()
Ahh, 45mm 1.8Feel Free to comment after you pick one.
Why di you like it... compared to others..
After selecting my choice, I was gladly rewarded with the fact that it was shot with the lens I currently have on Amazon's shopping cart. Just waiting a couple days to hit Checkout :-D
I've been saving gift cards for quite some time. Is now time to collect ;-)
Jim,I picked number 2 based on contrast, but number 3 seems to be the only one with the whole bottle in focus, so it wins on that count. Number 4 seems to be the favorite for bokeh, but apparently none of the other lenses actually have wide apertures at 45mm, so that's not much of a deal. If I wanted bokeh, I'd step back and shoot this with the 75 at 1.8, but that's not an available choice.
BTW, it might be interesting to see the comparison of all of them at the same aperture, which i guess would have to be f6 (which is now the 12-50, I presume).
--
Jim Salvas
"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky
Jim,I picked number 2 based on contrast, but number 3 seems to be the only one with the whole bottle in focus, so it wins on that count. Number 4 seems to be the favorite for bokeh, but apparently none of the other lenses actually have wide apertures at 45mm, so that's not much of a deal. If I wanted bokeh, I'd step back and shoot this with the 75 at 1.8, but that's not an available choice.
BTW, it might be interesting to see the comparison of all of them at the same aperture, which i guess would have to be f6 (which is now the 12-50, I presume).
--
Jim Salvas
"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky
I think you nailed my next plan... will compare them in f6.0.
before i posted it here, I posted it in FB... and somebody asked for a common aperture comparison also... and I told her I would do f6 also.
Like what you said this is the common maximum aperture among my 4 lenses.
Actually I would like to see f8.0 also, just to give some allowance.
The good news is the 2nd voted is picture #1 which is the stopped down version of Picture #4 the top voted. So there is still hope.I think the fact that #4 is winning the poll illustrates the very problem of people being obsessed with shallow depth of field to the point where if it starts eating at the subject, it's ignored in favor of as much blur as possible. Just like all the close-ups I've been seeing using maximum apertures of fast lenses, and a flower being only half in focus, or even less so.
Ever notice how people who get DSLRs to take photos of their gear on electronics forums often use the P mode or Auto and end up with indoor photos that have very shallow depth of field with only a small part of their subject being in focus. They might think it's artsy, but it just blurs what they are trying to show, and I find it distracting.
I chose 3 for the same reason. I also feel that the amount of blur in #3 allows for texture that compliments the texture in the leather of the foreground. The background of #4 is so blurred that it creates this harsh transition between the leather foreground and the background that I find distracting.I like 3 because of the background. Just enough blur to show the depth, but also enough definition to show that it's a bottle in a nice environment, like a tropical island.
Which do you prefer among this
Pictures taken with different lenses at their widest opening. Aperture priority.
ISO = fixed at 200
Tried to maintain the same field of view.
Please try to ignore the exif data.
Blog at:
http://robertevangelista.blogspot.com/2015/04/37-olympus-prime-vs-zoom-shutter-speed.html
1)
2)
3.)
4)
5.)
Sharing the joys of photography
http://www.dpreview.com/members/9704169684/galleries
http://robertevangelista.blogspot.com/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/robert_evangelista/sets/72157647543027710/show
Be kinder than necessary, lets make this a better community.