I thought the Nikon D810A was a joke

primeshooter

Veteran Member
Messages
8,962
Solutions
5
Reaction score
9,041
Location
Scotland
Last edited:
When I saw all these threads about yet another D800 iteration I thought it was just a joke! Seems pretty random when there other potential areas nikon could address in it's lineup to target a wider audience?
 
8c0f52cf02934b66b0145f0f34dc3905.jpg



--
 
From what I've read the new camera will have different filtration on the sensor and some firmware changes for shutter speeds. Not a lot of R&D or manufacturing costs involved. I say give those guys standing out in the cold what they want.
 
When I saw all these threads about yet another D800 iteration I thought it was just a joke! Seems pretty random when there other potential areas nikon could address in it's lineup to target a wider audience?
 
I think this D810a is not that bad after all. You may go to the astrophotography forum side and have a look. How many of them convert their existing camera to an IR camera? The only draw back from this model is it doesn't doesn't open up the full protential of it's CCD by removing the IR cut filter totally. They are IR and UV beside visible light out there in space. May be Nikon don't have their lens that correct the aberration s from IV to IR yet. Thats why. Hahahha......
 
I think this D810a is not that bad after all. You may go to the astrophotography forum side and have a look. How many of them convert their existing camera to an IR camera? The only draw back from this model is it doesn't doesn't open up the full protential of it's CCD by removing the IR cut filter totally. They are IR and UV beside visible light out there in space. May be Nikon don't have their lens that correct the aberration s from IV to IR yet. Thats why. Hahahha......
Nikon says CMOS sensor. That's a very big deal,
 
Anyone else note Nikon saying the A model goes to 15 mins (900s). I thought the D810 did that already, I have only shot a max of a 7 min exposure though so have not tested this out. Can anyone confirm the limit of the D810 shutter speed?
 
Anyone else note Nikon saying the A model goes to 15 mins (900s). I thought the D810 did that already, I have only shot a max of a 7 min exposure though so have not tested this out. Can anyone confirm the limit of the D810 shutter speed?
 
When I saw all these threads about yet another D800 iteration I thought it was just a joke! Seems pretty random when there other potential areas nikon could address in it's lineup to target a wider audience?

--
facebook https://www.facebook.com/steverphotographer
google + https://plus.google.com/u/0/+StevenRobinsonPhotographer/
flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/steverphotographer/
I've got to be honest, the market for astrophotography (which, don't forget, Canon has had all to itself) may well be bigger than the market for a pro grade APS-C cameras. Outside of DPR forums I don't know a single person who wants an APS-C pro grade body.
most of those will stick to their actively cooled SBIG's, QHY,etc cameras which are far better and not much more expensive than a D810A with a very simplistic cut filter.

while the original 20Da made sense (as it added in liveview into the camera and didn't just change the filter) and at the time, sensor were few and far between. The 60Da or this make little sense with the newer sensors from Sony and the Kodak full frame monochromatic sensor with significantly higher QE, and full electronic shutters. not to mention most have guide ports.

They are also better because they will have less thermal drift over time, being actively cooled - versus a D810A being passive cooled.

DSLR's for this scenario were always a "hack" because you could get a cheap DSLR that was 1/3 or the price or more off of what a dedicated CCD senor would cost you. So you put up with the poorer capability, heavier payload weight because you were saving money by doing so.

however when you're talking about nearly 4K for a dedicated astro camera - there's a ton of better options for astrophotography. heck take a D810, convert to full spectrum and you are ahead of the game - you can use it for color and far better astro work than this camera.

the timer modes really show that Nikon has very little clue on what and how this would be used.

if Nikon really wanted to rock some worlds - put this sensor into a stripped down assembly like one of the QX's from sony. cool it, without an LCD, with tethering working right and they'd have something.
 
Last edited:
I'll have to admit that a small part of me suspected it was a joke as well... probably something that Nikon leaked to prevent people from making rash decisions because of the recent 5DS and 5DSR releases. I've always knew that astrophotography is a market on it's own but I never thought it was big enough to warrant a specialty camera... Don't think this camera applies to anyone but astrophotographers though... Which means Nikon will probably only sell a few thousand of these.
 
If Leica's M Monochrome is viable within the product line at 7200$ US certainly an D810M monochrome would be as well for half the price and all those available Zeiss F mount lenses to shoot with.
 
Anyone else note Nikon saying the A model goes to 15 mins (900s). I thought the D810 did that already, I have only shot a max of a 7 min exposure though so have not tested this out. Can anyone confirm the limit of the D810 shutter speed?

--
facebook https://www.facebook.com/steverphotographer
google + https://plus.google.com/u/0/+StevenRobinsonPhotographer/
flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/steverphotographer/
Above 30 seconds and you are in bulb mode. I'm guessing the new camera allows you to set a long shutter speed.
Yes, so not practically that different then, but will be useful for the astro geeks I guess if they have a specific time they want to shoot over and over at and then stack. Bulb mode let's you do it already you just need the hard task of having a stopwatch, a watch, or a phone with you and a release with the standard D800's/10s.

--
facebook https://www.facebook.com/steverphotographer
google + https://plus.google.com/u/0/+StevenRobinsonPhotographer/
flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/steverphotographer/
 
Last edited:
When I saw all these threads about yet another D800 iteration I thought it was just a joke! Seems pretty random when there other potential areas nikon could address in it's lineup to target a wider audience?

--
facebook https://www.facebook.com/steverphotographer
google + https://plus.google.com/u/0/+StevenRobinsonPhotographer/
flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/steverphotographer/
I've got to be honest, the market for astrophotography (which, don't forget, Canon has had all to itself) may well be bigger than the market for a pro grade APS-C cameras. Outside of DPR forums I don't know a single person who wants an APS-C pro grade body.
Do you really think there are more people shooting night skies than those interested in innumerable football, soccer, lacrosse, rugby, field hockey, -- you name it -- games played at countless high schools, colleges, recreational and semi-professional leagues, etc, etc.

And I don't even mention all the guys and gals shooting flying subjects.

I'm not trying to start a major argument, I shoot both DX and FX, but I honestly think you're slightly off base here, and so is Nikon.
 
Last edited:
I'm the sort of person that would most likely buy the D810a, but I know I can get a set point cooled monochrome CCD, complete with an integrated filter wheel and a set of LRGB and narrowband filters and an apochromat astrograph to use it on and still have change over a D810a.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top