First images of the soon to come E-M5II.

- Much improved PDAF based C-AF
- Much faster shooting with C-AF (6.5fps is hardly fast today)

- Much better "viewfinder usability" during continuous shooting
You are perfectly describing a GH4 here (with PDAF exchanged by DOF, which works just as good or better) :)
 
- Much improved PDAF based C-AF

- Much faster shooting with C-AF (6.5fps is hardly fast today)

- Much better "viewfinder usability" during continuous shooting
You are perfectly describing a GH4 here (with PDAF exchanged by DOF, which works just as good or better) :)
Well, I'd like to keep some features in:

- Great IBIS

- Great OOC JPEGs

- Perfect balance of small size and comfortable grip and button layout :)

- Sub 500grams Body

- Plenty Customizable Buttons
 
I wonder if we're seeing some clever stratification of the OM-D line.

I'm wondering if Olympus are going E-M5 -> Landscapes and studio optimised. E-M1 -> wildlife, sport, like the D4/D810 combo.

That would make a lot of sense, and would be a persuasive argument for people to own both E-Mx models.
Yes, I think so, and it's a wise step for Olympus to take I believe. But I thought they should take this step by bringing a new high-res sensor into EM5 and enhancing PDAF and low-light performance in EM1. Maybe there is no high-res MFT sensor available yet so they try sensor-shift instead. But as there are good 20MP 1" sensors it wouldn't be impossible to make a 24 MP mft one. So I'm a little confused.
Oly doesn't make their own sensors so they're shackled by the roadmap and motivations of others... Now if we were talking about a Panasonic...
Yes I know they are dependent on others, but three years after Sony made the 4/3 16 MP sensor exclusively for Olympus you could expect some development from them.
 
I wonder if we're seeing some clever stratification of the OM-D line.

I'm wondering if Olympus are going E-M5 -> Landscapes and studio optimised. E-M1 -> wildlife, sport, like the D4/D810 combo.

That would make a lot of sense, and would be a persuasive argument for people to own both E-Mx models.
Yes, I think so, and it's a wise step for Olympus to take I believe. But I thought they should take this step by bringing a new high-res sensor into EM5 and enhancing PDAF and low-light performance in EM1. Maybe there is no high-res MFT sensor available yet so they try sensor-shift instead. But as there are good 20MP 1" sensors it wouldn't be impossible to make a 24 MP mft one. So I'm a little confused.
Oly doesn't make their own sensors so they're shackled by the roadmap and motivations of others... Now if we were talking about a Panasonic...
Yes I know they are dependent on others, but three years after Sony made the 4/3 16 MP sensor exclusively for Olympus you could expect some development from them.
That's exactly what I was hoping for.
 
I mean they should have developed a new sensor.
Olympus does not develop any sensors that I know of. They could have selected a different sensor from a third party, with higher pixel density, but I do not believe that any sensor currently available on the market can deliver a higher resolution while at the same time equal/higher Signal/Noise ratio AND equal/higher DR, hence there would be a performance cost to using a higher density sensor at the expense of Noise and/or DR and the overall performance would drop below that currently offered on APS-C 24Mpix (which is marginally superior still to the best 16Mpix M43 sensor available right now).

Photosites on 16Mpix M43 sensor are 1.08x smaller than those of a 24Mpix APS-C sensor, and would be 1.63x smaller if it were 24Mpix M43 sensor, how can M43 possibly compete on Noise and DR with such smaller photosites? Hence, noise control is perhaps the most challenging issue with M43 at the moment. Recent developments on NR algorithms have closed the gap, but nonetheless, the sensor technology still has to come a long way and the RAW noise data hasn't changed all that much in the past two years.

Don't you think that Olympus wouldn't jump on it if it was such a sensor available? This is what every camera manufacturer dream of.
 
I can understand your point of view. It's just that I am so addicted to the tilt and swivel screen and take almost as many photos in portrait orientation often overhead and from all kinds of awkward positions. People have different needs obviously so I think it could be quite a smart move if someone introduced interchangeable screens.
 
Why would one buy the em-1/em5m2 over the gh4, other than wanting the retro styling? Size, better stabilization?
 
Why would one buy the em-1/em5m2 over the gh4, other than wanting the retro styling? Size, better stabilization?
Smaller and lighter.

IBIS, IBIS, and IBIS again :)

Better colors in OOC JPEGs

Very good ergonomics (2x2 and all)

Did I mention IBIS? :-)

Incredible weather sealing with 12-40 "Kit" lens.
 
Why would one buy the em-1/em5m2 over the gh4, other than wanting the retro styling? Size, better stabilization?
Smaller and lighter.

IBIS, IBIS, and IBIS again :)

Better colors in OOC JPEGs

Very good ergonomics (2x2 and all)

Did I mention IBIS? :-)

Incredible weather sealing with 12-40 "Kit" lens.
Doesn't the gh4 have stabilization and good ergonomics? The em5 needed an add on grip. That's not good ergonomics. And can't you use the 12-40 on the gh4, where using something like the 7-14 gives you purple blobs on Olympus? And I haven't seen the video specs for the em52, and they may be improved, but will they be as good?

I am looking at jumping in but can't decide, so I don't have a dog in this fight, just wondering what I missed.
 
Why would one buy the em-1/em5m2 over the gh4, other than wanting the retro styling? Size, better stabilization?
Smaller and lighter.
Maybe, or maybe not. There are other M43 options that smaller and lighter.
IBIS, IBIS, and IBIS again :)
This is for you. For me - no suspended sensor. I want sensor to be welded into the body, so I have proper sensor cooling, and no suspicions about shutter shock. There are other old fashion options to stabilize camera, and I know how to use them.
Better colors in OOC JPEGs
Come on. Keep this for yourself
Very good ergonomics (2x2 and all)
2 x 2, 4 x 4, and whatever else. GH4 is perfect in hands, and straight forward in menu structure
Did I mention IBIS? :-)
Yes, you did
Incredible weather sealing with 12-40 "Kit" lens.
I think that in this case weather sealing is quite credible for those who may concerned.
 
Sensor shift annoys me to be honest, because I've been doing it for so long WITH a tripod. Now hacks can bang out a 40mp landscape photo without even thinking about it :-( bloody why should camera noobs have this tool.
Just because some soccer mom somewhere in South Elbonia bought a GH4 to video from the stans her kid playing baseball, in auto-everything mode using the built in mic, it should not devaluate the GH4 as a tool.

Yes I can imagine that some are going to shoot in merge mode by default. Their problem...
 
Why would one buy the em-1/em5m2 over the gh4, other than wanting the retro styling? Size, better stabilization?
Smaller and lighter.

IBIS, IBIS, and IBIS again :)

Better colors in OOC JPEGs

Very good ergonomics (2x2 and all)

Did I mention IBIS? :-)

Incredible weather sealing with 12-40 "Kit" lens.
Doesn't the gh4 have stabilization and good ergonomics? The em5 needed an add on grip. That's
No stabilization for GH4... There's stabilization in some of the lenses (mainly the zoom ones) but not in most primes and also some zooms are missing.

You are right about EM5... I was referring to EM1
not good ergonomics. And can't you use the 12-40 on the gh4, where using something like the 7-
Can't use the 12-40 and still get IS.
14 gives you purple blobs on Olympus? And I haven't seen the video specs for the em52, and they may be improved, but will they be as good?
If you want Video - GH4 is your friend. it's a killer cam for video. Oly is years behind no questions asked. I don't do Video. EM5 might have better video though. Keep in mind if u wanna shoot video with Prime lenses, lack of IBIS is a huge nono.
I am looking at jumping in but can't decide, so I don't have a dog in this fight, just wondering what I missed.
 
This seems to be the same Sony sensor that the previous model used. For their flagship body, the EM!, Olympus went to a new Panasonic sensor, the same one that is in the GH4.

F.
 
Smaller and lighter.
Maybe, or maybe not. There are other M43 options that smaller and lighter.
There are others for sure. But specifically EM1 is 497 grams vs 560grams of GH4. And physically, the GH4 is taller and thicker.
IBIS, IBIS, and IBIS again :)
This is for you. For me - no suspended sensor. I want sensor to be welded into the body, so I have proper sensor cooling, and no suspicions about shutter shock. There are other old fashion options to stabilize camera, and I know how to use them.
Fair enough. I love IS. I love getting IS in my primes. It's one of the main reasons for me to switch to Olympus...
Better colors in OOC JPEGs
Come on. Keep this for yourself
Why? I can't express my opinions? I like the output from Olympus better, and I'd rather minimize RAW editing to extreme conditions only.
Very good ergonomics (2x2 and all)
2 x 2, 4 x 4, and whatever else. GH4 is perfect in hands, and straight forward in menu structure
I'll give you that. I LOVE the ergonomics of the EM1, but I'm sure I'll be happy with GH 4 in that sense too...
Did I mention IBIS? :-)
Yes, you did
Incredible weather sealing with 12-40 "Kit" lens.
I think that in this case weather sealing is quite credible for those who may concerned.
I believe the GH4 is properly weather sealed - I do not have anything to base it on, but from the way its built it feels that way. HOWEVER, I have read a lot of complaining threads on the 12-35/2.8IS in terms of weather sealing. It is sealed to some degree, but it cannot withstand REAL abuse in terms of weather. After reading quite a bit of threads here on DPR on ppl who had moisture getting into their 12-35 - I would not be very comfortable walking with it in the rain uncovered. The 12-40 is really truly sealed. (and the 12-40 won't go on a GH4 cause then u get no IS...)

Anyway - to each his own. we have plenty of selection options - I think this thread started with "Why would anyone choose EM1 over GH4" - so here are the reasons. They may not apply to everyone, but for me, the size and weight, IBIS, Colors, Weather Sealing and Ergonomics are the main reasons. If I prioritized video or tracking AF, or dedicated ISO buttons, I'd take Panasonic.
 
The EM1 does not need a grip

and for EM5 - you can put just the landscape grip - it's not so heavy

in any case - to each his own :)
 
Why would one buy the em-1/em5m2 over the gh4, other than wanting the retro styling? Size, better stabilization?
Retro styled or not, it's a beautiful design, and that's not unimportant to many, including me. Can't help I think the typical DSLR design is ugly (which the GH4 reminds me on) while a classic slr like an OM1 is an excellent piece of design and functionality. I'm probably old enough to appreciate the EM5II design because it reminds me of a classic slr, but it has modern dslr-like controls, which I have nothing against.
 
I haven't seen anyone mention it yet, but there is a new icon on the mode dial, between the SCN and movie icon. I'd guess that's the 40mp mode.
 
Smaller and lighter.
Maybe, or maybe not. There are other M43 options that smaller and lighter.
There are others for sure. But specifically EM1 is 497 grams vs 560grams of GH4. And physically, the GH4 is taller and thicker.
IBIS, IBIS, and IBIS again :)
This is for you. For me - no suspended sensor. I want sensor to be welded into the body, so I have proper sensor cooling, and no suspicions about shutter shock. There are other old fashion options to stabilize camera, and I know how to use them.
Fair enough. I love IS. I love getting IS in my primes. It's one of the main reasons for me to switch to Olympus...
I need IS when I use lens with FL longer than 75mm handheld. I keep OIS on my primary 14-45 ZOOM "OFF" all the time for the very same reason - I want to avoid vibration.

Better colors in OOC JPEGs
Come on. Keep this for yourself
Why? I can't express my opinions? I like the output from Olympus better, and I'd rather minimize RAW editing to extreme conditions only.
RAW editing takes less time than JEPG editing, that is why I use RAW.
Very good ergonomics (2x2 and all)
2 x 2, 4 x 4, and whatever else. GH4 is perfect in hands, and straight forward in menu structure
I'll give you that. I LOVE the ergonomics of the EM1, but I'm sure I'll be happy with GH 4 in that sense too...
Did I mention IBIS? :-)
Yes, you did
Incredible weather sealing with 12-40 "Kit" lens.
I think that in this case weather sealing is quite credible for those who may concerned.
I believe the GH4 is properly weather sealed - I do not have anything to base it on, but from the way its built it feels that way. HOWEVER, I have read a lot of complaining threads on the 12-35/2.8IS in terms of weather sealing. It is sealed to some degree, but it cannot withstand REAL abuse in terms of weather. After reading quite a bit of threads here on DPR on ppl who had moisture getting into their 12-35 - I would not be very comfortable walking with it in the rain uncovered. The 12-40 is really truly sealed. (and the 12-40 won't go on a GH4 cause then u get no IS...)

Anyway - to each his own. we have plenty of selection options - I think this thread started with "Why would anyone choose EM1 over GH4" - so here are the reasons. They may not apply to everyone, but for me, the size and weight, IBIS, Colors, Weather Sealing and Ergonomics are the main reasons. If I prioritized video or tracking AF, or dedicated ISO buttons, I'd take Panasonic.
I do not do video, I use GH2, I have no reasons to replace it.

My problems with Olympus are:

1 for a long time Oly did not produce camera with built-in EVF, so I got used to Panasonic.

2. I do not trust the brand that sells enormous amounts of refurbished and reconditioned products (other words I have quality concerns)
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top