Bye bye D800

24 1.4G, 85 1.4D and 200vr 2 about a 5% hit rate on all compared to 95% on the D3.
I was sitting across from my girlfriend with the 85/1.8G shooting from about 3.5 feet away, which works out to a DOF less than 1" (by some measures closer to 1/2"):



Resized to 58% to match 12 MP at 100%.

Resized to 58% to match 12 MP at 100%.

As far as I'm concerned getting any of the eyelash in-focus is a hit given how difficult it is to focus on one eye, especially when dealing with such a narrow DOF. I suppose YMMV; not sure if we are operating under different standards, different camera settings, or if my D800 just does better than yours.

I hope your D810 brings you satisfaction.
 
24 1.4G, 85 1.4D and 200vr 2 about a 5% hit rate on all compared to 95% on the D3.
I was sitting across from my girlfriend with the 85/1.8G shooting from about 3.5 feet away, which works out to a DOF less than 1" (by some measures closer to 1/2"):

Resized to 58% to match 12 MP at 100%.

Resized to 58% to match 12 MP at 100%.

As far as I'm concerned getting any of the eyelash in-focus is a hit given how difficult it is to focus on one eye, especially when dealing with such a narrow DOF. I suppose YMMV; not sure if we are operating under different standards, different camera settings, or if my D800 just does better than yours.

I hope your D810 brings you satisfaction.
Am I reading this correctly? You are pleased the lens can focus at f/2.8? I should flippin' hope so the amount of money the camera and lens costs. The test is f/1.4 to f/2, and the D810 is much improved, try it.

--
facebook https://www.facebook.com/steverphotographer
google + https://plus.google.com/u/0/+StevenRobinsonPhotographer/
flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/steverphotographer/
 
Either one has a broken unit or doesn't! The broken focus can get help from getting serviced.

Hey I understand some have all sort of excuses to upgrade. My 16 year old is lik that too. :-)
 
Last edited:
24 1.4G, 85 1.4D and 200vr 2 about a 5% hit rate on all compared to 95% on the D3.
I was sitting across from my girlfriend with the 85/1.8G shooting from about 3.5 feet away, which works out to a DOF less than 1" (by some measures closer to 1/2"):

Resized to 58% to match 12 MP at 100%.

Resized to 58% to match 12 MP at 100%.

As far as I'm concerned getting any of the eyelash in-focus is a hit given how difficult it is to focus on one eye, especially when dealing with such a narrow DOF. I suppose YMMV; not sure if we are operating under different standards, different camera settings, or if my D800 just does better than yours.

I hope your D810 brings you satisfaction.
Am I reading this correctly? You are pleased the lens can focus at f/2.8?
I am pleased that the camera can nail the focus to within half an inch.
I should flippin' hope so the amount of money the camera and lens costs. The test is f/1.4 to f/2, and the D810 is much improved, try it.
I've done f/2 too and the hit rate is about the same. As I said, with such a narrow DOF just hitting part of the eyelash is all you can hope for. Further away and the DOF is greater, and the hit rate would be comparable even if I did narrow the DOF to where only one eye and a small portion of the face is in-focus.
 
You will be replaced with a nice and shiny new D810 which hopefully will focus with fast glass!

My daughter holding it for the very last time, emotional times...

256ed51895b24c44b363d9e0d962cd32.jpg

--
Martyn
D3
D800
24 1.4G
14-24
70-200VRII
85 1.4D
50 1.8G
200f2vr2
Please LIKE my page 8-))
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Martyn-Wilkes-Photography/134057003306205
[/QUOTE]
 

Attachments

  • 3c3c02fa2e5642baac847bb41ef12b63.jpg
    3c3c02fa2e5642baac847bb41ef12b63.jpg
    4.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 40306e4c8b214d91b110a523764bdd14.jpg
    40306e4c8b214d91b110a523764bdd14.jpg
    5.9 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Yeh, I would keep the camera and let her use it. She has talent. I can tell by the way she holds the camera.
Who told you this is the right way to hold the camera?... This is what I was hearing many times... Many "modern" highly paid photographers hold cameras different ways and "explain" why... "Whateva works"!!! I was bitten so many times for telling people how to hold it right and why classic way suggesting putting your left palm under and not over the lens... Just ridiculous...

Kudos to you for teaching your kid to hold it right way from the beginning... :-)

I am sure those "professionals" can explain this holding technique as well... LOL...



1414557743162_wps_4_Girl_holding_camera.jpg




--

Real photography - it's just the ability to see what was already created by God!
www.grigphoto.com
 
Last edited:
You will be replaced with a nice and shiny new D810 which hopefully will focus with fast glass!

My daughter holding it for the very last time, emotional times...

256ed51895b24c44b363d9e0d962cd32.jpg

--
Martyn
D3
D800
24 1.4G
14-24
70-200VRII
85 1.4D
50 1.8G
200f2vr2
Please LIKE my page 8-))
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Martyn-Wilkes-Photography/134057003306205
Three weeks ago I have done a portrait shoot with my new Sigma 50/1.4 Art on my D800E all wide open in the old town of Havanna.
There was some hit and miss well above a 5% hit rate for various reasons.
In particular with full body shots the focus sensors are a little big and sometimes too much in the centre of the frame requiring focus and recompose which introduces fuzzyness at that level of DOF. I was too keen trying to shoot at somewhat slow shutter speeds.
Well for the former I have not heard anything about a better size and coverage of the FX frame by the array of focus sensors with the D810. For the latter the camera is not to blame.
Cheers Andreas
--
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top