Okay, now that's impressive to me. Neat.
- For OSS E-mount lenses, the two stabilization systems will work together.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, now that's impressive to me. Neat.
- For OSS E-mount lenses, the two stabilization systems will work together.
The current A7 does 5fps with tracking. It is ok with that too (both the A7s and A7r are a lot slower as only the A7 has hybrid AF).So they increased the size to 600 grams in order to fit in IBIS. This is almost the weight of Nikon DF.
Sensitivity is EV (-1) nowhere close to EV(-4) of A7s
AF is clearly not based on A6000
Silent shutter of A7s is not mentioned, so it is safe to say it is not there
Likely the same sensor that is in A7 (otherwise would have said "a new sensor.")
It says AF is 30% better than A7. That does not explain much to me. Why not keep (-4) of A7s? Why not keep silent shutter feature. I am not even talking about 4K recording.
I was going to sell my A7r to get this, but now I am thinking about waiting for rumored A9 which supposedly per rumors site will get full A6000 autofocus. I assume IBIS will be build in as well. 47MP won't hurt either.
One thing I kind of would wanted and hoped for is build-in spring flash. I guess that ain't happening. I don't buy the argument that pro cameras don't have a build-in flash - Nikons up to D810 all have it.
Overall it is an exciting new product, IBIS in a full frame mirrorless camera..... coming from someone who have owned Olympus EM5 and EM1.....this is a great feature to have, especially on full frame sensor where any sort of shake is critical. I might sell my Oly EM1 to get this though....
The new A7ii is only a few grams heavier than the Olympus OMD E-M1. Sure, most Olympus lenses are smaller, but if you use only a few Sony lenses that are not massive, then the size-weight advantage of M43 is negligible in comparison to the massive advantage in image quality.-JM43 is a smaller and lighter system overall. Not everyone does want to carry around big lenses, you know. I agree, the EM1 is going to have a tougher time of it, but M43 really does have a unique product in terms of overall system size/performance ratio.
Well, Nikon DF is 700 grams without battery, 750 with battery I believe.Abs, D750 is 840 grams with batt/card; against 600g. And much smaller, too, you would definitely not confuse the two.
As in, "eat your hat sigma"?If the mount isn't large enough for a FF sensor, how is it possible to have a FF sensor bouncing around in it?
Press release says 190,000 yen, which is about $1600. Usually Japan's a bit cheaper so I'll guess about $1800
well the only two native AF lenses I know that match your description are 35FE and 55FE.The new A7ii is only a few grams heavier than the Olympus OMD E-M1. Sure, most Olympus lenses are smaller, but if you use only a few Sony lenses that are not massive, then the size-weight advantage of M43 is negligible in comparison to the massive advantage in image quality.-JM43 is a smaller and lighter system overall. Not everyone does want to carry around big lenses, you know. I agree, the EM1 is going to have a tougher time of it, but M43 really does have a unique product in terms of overall system size/performance ratio.
Funny that you don't mention the FE 16-35mm being significantly smaller than the DSLR lens counterparts. The FE 24-70mm f/4 is lighter than its Canon counterpart (460g vs 600g). The 70-200,, F/4 is an exception it seems ;-)well the only two native AF lenses I know that match your description are 35FE and 55FE.The new A7ii is only a few grams heavier than the Olympus OMD E-M1. Sure, most Olympus lenses are smaller, but if you use only a few Sony lenses that are not massive, then the size-weight advantage of M43 is negligible in comparison to the massive advantage in image quality.-JM43 is a smaller and lighter system overall. Not everyone does want to carry around big lenses, you know. I agree, the EM1 is going to have a tougher time of it, but M43 really does have a unique product in terms of overall system size/performance ratio.
24-70 is about the same size as Canon full frame 24-70/4 and 70-200/4 is actually heavier than 70-200/4 Canon.
As far as 85FE which is the lens I am waiting the most for, it is not even on the road map, so who knows how much it would weigh and what the size it would be. I hope they do 85 1.8 and not 1.4 to keep it manageable in terms of size and weight. At least now they dont have to worry about putting in extra weight of Image stabilizer in that 85!!!!
In any case, I am probably selling my Olympus EM1 to get this. The image quality advantage, as you pointed, is MASSIVE.