LX100. What questions do you still have?

ISO6400 is insanely good for such a small camera. I held it in my hand, it's actually not far bigger than a G7x but it handles a lot better. it's smaller than my Nikon P7800. I think it's going to be my new baby.
 
I've read conflicting reports about the 1080p video recording limit - is it 29:59 or 60 minutes? It would be fantastic if you could just let it shoot until the camera automatically stops recording and report back.

Many thanks for this Q/A opportunity.
 
Nice photos. I was testing mine indoors yesterday with the rainy weather and noticed the auto iso is limited to ISO 1600 and it doesn't push above that until it drops 1/10sec which is too low esp at 75mm. No reviews mentions this except I see in your post.

I tried the intelligent iso last night and it picked up from 1/6 to 1/60 sec shots w/ shooting the same subject, eg no movement. I tried this morning eg first shots have always higher shutter, then lowers it since there is no movement. I have to try with moving subjects, but I agree with a post that says it has its own mind. I have gm1/gx7 and their auto iso usually limits the low end 1/60-1/80sec if I remember correctly, so I never tried the intelligent iso, etc. I thought Sony RX100 has a low limit at 1/30sec as Sony increased it with its nex cameras from 1/30 sec (nex-5) to 1/60 sec (to others including A7's)...

Only remedy for now is using the manual mode and pick the shutter, then auto iso picks the right iso...
Here are a few sample pictures. These are by no means great pictures. I was simply trying to find what the limits of the camera are

Auto ISO is terrible for moving subjects. Thankfully they fixed the Intelligent ISO and now it works perfectly for anything alive. The Auto ISO works great for everything else.

IS seemed to be great. The camera doesn't compensate for large amplitude vibrations. You can't just swing the camera around and expect it to correct your errors. It corrects for vibrations not large translations. It seemed to do that fairly well even when I used 1 full second of shutter duration.

\\\

--
GH4, GH3(For Sale), and Full Spectrum GF1 Sample movies
http://www.youtube.com/user/mpgxsvcd#play/uploads
GH3 Tips and Tricks
GH2 Setup Walk through
http://vimeo.com/user442745
GH3, GH2, GF1 Pictures
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/4222674355/albums
--
Serhan
http://www.pbase.com/sc_20170/
http://www.pbase.com/sc_20170/image/101814518/medium.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here are a few sample pictures. These are by no means great pictures. I was simply trying to find what the limits of the camera are.

A few interesting things of note. Check out the picture with the flash activated indoors. 1/4000 of a second flash synch speed?

ISO 25000 isn't terrible. Not great but a lot better than the small sensor cameras would do.

Auto ISO is terrible for moving subjects. Thankfully they fixed the Intelligent ISO and now it works perfectly for anything alive. The Auto ISO works great for everything else.

IS seemed to be great. The camera doesn't compensate for large amplitude vibrations. You can't just swing the camera around and expect it to correct your errors. It corrects for vibrations not large translations. It seemed to do that fairly well even when I used 1 full second of shutter duration.
















1/4000 Flash Synch Speed?








Some lens Flare


Flash












ISO 25,800

--
GH4, GH3(For Sale), and Full Spectrum GF1 Sample movies
http://www.youtube.com/user/mpgxsvcd#play/uploads
GH3 Tips and Tricks
GH2 Setup Walk through
http://vimeo.com/user442745
GH3, GH2, GF1 Pictures
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/4222674355/albums
The camera is in very capable hands and seems a lot better than what I expected after the flood of original posts. The only thing I do not like, but I do not like it on any cameras is the foliage, it is better than many others for sure and as good as the APSc cameras I have used. Thanks again for such kind postings.

--
If i am typing on my iPad, please excuse any typos.
Flickr page. https://www.flickr.com/photos/84089808@N06/
 
How does it compare to the LX7 for deep DOF shooting in low light?

For example, to get the same DOF as f/1.7 on the LX7, I'd need to stop down to f/4 on the LX100. F/4 on the LX7 would be f/9 on the LX100. Which performs better under those conditions?

Thanks!
Neither of the cameras need to be stopped down at wide angles. These aren't full frame cameras. Even at wide apertures these cameras usually have infinite depth of field. I would stop down to F4.0 if there is plenty of light. Otherwise close to wide open is just fine. I would never intentionally shoot at F8.0 or above with the LX100.
 
The JPG for a 16:9 is 4480 x 2520

A RAW for 16:9 opened by;

PSP or Qimage is 4496 x 2536

RawTherapee is 4488 x 2528

The JPG is 24m at the wide end so what is it for the others?

22m or 20m.

8)
 
I,m not so happy with the pinocchio-nose extending lens on the LX100 and have a question: Will I have the wide end with extended lens equal to my LX3? (I use the wide end to 80-90%)
 
Nice photos. I was testing mine indoors yesterday with the rainy weather and noticed the auto iso is limited to ISO 1600 and it doesn't push above that until it drops 1/10sec which is too low esp at 75mm. No reviews mentions this except I see in your post.

I tried the intelligent iso last night and it picked up from 1/6 to 1/60 sec shots w/ shooting the same subject, eg no movement. I tried this morning eg first shots have always higher shutter, then lowers it since there is no movement. I have to try with moving subjects, but I agree with a post that says it has its own mind. I have gm1/gx7 and their auto iso usually limits the low end 1/60-1/80sec if I remember correctly, so I never tried the intelligent iso, etc. I thought Sony RX100 has a low limit at 1/30sec as Sony increased it with its nex cameras from 1/30 sec (nex-5) to 1/60 sec (to others including A7's)...

Only remedy for now is using the manual mode and pick the shutter, then auto iso picks the right iso...

Serhan
http://www.pbase.com/sc_20170/
http://www.pbase.com/sc_20170/image/101814518/medium.jpg
A good portion of the review I am working on explains exactly what Auto ISO and Intelligent ISO do. Panasonic finally got those right with the LX100. You just have to know what they are doing to utilize them properly.

Honestly, I use Auto ISO for 99% of my pictures and videos with the LX100. The logic is spot on this time.

The LX100 really is a revolutionary camera. Not because it has aperture and shutter speed dials. That has been done before. What is truly unique is that its Auto ISO feature finally works with the optimal settings for the camera.

In the past the user was almost always smarter than the camera’s auto ISO. Now with the LX100 it is just as smart as the user if it knows all of the parameters the user knows.
 
How does it compare to the LX7 for deep DOF shooting in low light?

For example, to get the same DOF as f/1.7 on the LX7, I'd need to stop down to f/4 on the LX100. F/4 on the LX7 would be f/9 on the LX100. Which performs better under those conditions?

Thanks!
Neither of the cameras need to be stopped down at wide angles. These aren't full frame cameras. Even at wide apertures these cameras usually have infinite depth of field. I would stop down to F4.0 if there is plenty of light. Otherwise close to wide open is just fine. I would never intentionally shoot at F8.0 or above with the LX100.
Thanks for your reply...

I mostly shoot small-ish items that fill the frame (e.g., book or magazine size) so I'm always running into depth of field issues.

For that stuff, I'd shoot with my LX7 wide open, but on my m4/3 gear, I always have to stop down to at least f/4.

Thanks again.
 
How does it compare to the LX7 for deep DOF shooting in low light?

For example, to get the same DOF as f/1.7 on the LX7, I'd need to stop down to f/4 on the LX100. F/4 on the LX7 would be f/9 on the LX100. Which performs better under those conditions?

Thanks!
Neither of the cameras need to be stopped down at wide angles. These aren't full frame cameras. Even at wide apertures these cameras usually have infinite depth of field. I would stop down to F4.0 if there is plenty of light. Otherwise close to wide open is just fine. I would never intentionally shoot at F8.0 or above with the LX100.
Thanks for your reply...

I mostly shoot small-ish items that fill the frame (e.g., book or magazine size) so I'm always running into depth of field issues.

For that stuff, I'd shoot with my LX7 wide open, but on my m4/3 gear, I always have to stop down to at least f/4.

Thanks again.
That is an interesting scenario. If the books are not well lit you will need wide apertures to keep ISO low. However, you probably can’t get too close to them with some of the m4/3s lenses because of minimum focus distance issues.

I would say that the LX100 would be good for that type of work. Just shoot wide angle with a relatively wide aperture. F1.7 might be too shallow even on the LX100 if the book is very small. However, this really is more macro work than normal everyday shooting.

For macro work you might have to stop down…. a little. I wouldn’t go hog wild with it though. F2.8 or perhaps F4.0 will work with wide angles. Most shots I have seen so far are using F7.0 or greater for normal everyday pictures. That shows a lack of understanding of how to use a smaller sensor camera.
 
Mine will arrive tomorrow & need to find a USB composite video cable for my FPV setup on my UAV.

Thanks for any information on this!

Cheers, Jon
 
Mine will arrive tomorrow & need to find a USB composite video cable for my FPV setup on my UAV.

Thanks for any information on this!

Cheers, Jon
 
I do aerial photography & need a video connection to my video transmitter, so I can see what is being recorded. I need to know what cable I need to get. I just need 2 wires from the camera .... video & ground.

Cheers, Jon
Mine will arrive tomorrow & need to find a USB composite video cable for my FPV setup on my UAV.

Thanks for any information on this!

Cheers, Jon
 
I do aerial photography & need a video connection to my video transmitter, so I can see what is being recorded. I need to know what cable I need to get. I just need 2 wires from the camera .... video & ground.

Cheers, Jon
I doubt that you will be able to do what you want to do with the LX100 but I will test it out anyway. I think the GHx is the only line that allows monitoring over HDMI. I don’t think the LX100 allows monitoring over HDMI or RCA but I am not sure on that so I will check it tonight.
 
I appreciate that ... the specs do say "USB av/audio". I do this with my GoPro & also did it with the Sony Nex 6.

Cheers, Jon
 
I do aerial photography & need a video connection to my video transmitter, so I can see what is being recorded. I need to know what cable I need to get. I just need 2 wires from the camera .... video & ground.

Cheers, Jon
I doubt that you will be able to do what you want to do with the LX100 but I will test it out anyway. I think the GHx is the only line that allows monitoring over HDMI. I don’t think the LX100 allows monitoring over HDMI or RCA but I am not sure on that so I will check it tonight.
 
Only interested in the LX100 composite video out. No HDMI needed!

Cheers, Jon
 
According to page 71 of the LX100 manual, the compatible cable is listed as DMW-AVC1

 
Maybe you missed my question from earlier in the thread:

I've read conflicting reports about the 1080p video recording limit - is it 29:59 or 120 minutes? It would be fantastic if you could just let it shoot until the camera automatically stops recording and report back.

1. Page 18 of the PDF manual I downloaded from Panasonic UK says:

"[AVCHD] motion pictures: Recording stops when the continuous recording time exceeds 29 minutes and 59 seconds"

2. Whereas the Panasonic UK website says:

"Continuous recordable time (motion pictures) AVCHD Approx. 120 min (FHD/50p), Approx. 125 min (FHD/50i)"

http://www.panasonic.com/uk/consume...nd-shoot/compact-cameras/dmc-lx100.html#specs

Many thanks for this Q/A opportunity.
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top