FastRawViewer

  • Thread starter Thread starter malch
  • Start date Start date
M

malch

Guest
I haven't seen this new program discussed here. Maybe folks were simply not aware of it or maybe they didn't like it. Anyway, I think it's interesting although I'm not sure where it fits in my own personal workflow. It comes from the talented if acerbic Iliah Borg who some will know as quite a character. I have to say the RAW conversions are blazingly fast:

 
. . . talented if acerbic . . .

the RAW conversions are blazingly fast
Excuse me, just a little nit I feel the urge to pick: does the program demand (a la RawDigger beta) an active internet connection just "to check for updates" each and every single time you run it? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Excuse me, just a little nit I feel the urge to pick: does the program demand (a la RawDigger beta) an active internet connection just "to check for updates" each and every single time you run it? Thanks.
I don't speak for the vendor/author but...

I blocked all connections for that program with my firewall and it still runs just fine.

If you care about these things (and I do too) I highly recommend installing some good firewall software. I use this one:

 
Excuse me, just a little nit I feel the urge to pick: does the program demand (a la RawDigger beta) an active internet connection just "to check for updates" each and every single time you run it? Thanks.
FastRawViewer does not demand internet connection. It uses it for updates check (once a week in default config, you may change it), but updates check is in background, so it does not affects your interaction with the program even internet is not available.

--
Alex Tutubalin
http://www.libraw.org
 
Last edited:
I see it's still in beta, it really needs a 'Folders' panel with thumbnail views. (Unless I've missed it)

Brian
 
I see it's still in beta, it really needs a 'Folders' panel with thumbnail views. (Unless I've missed it)
We do not have this feature, and it is a matter of debate if it is needed, quite a lot of beta testers see it as unnecessary for the intended workflow of pre-selecting keepers. To resolve this conflict, we are trying to come up with something that has a better ergonomics than just a generic light table.
 
When compiling dcraw yesterday I noticed that it optionally called for the Jasper library. This might be the same as...

JasPer is an open source JPEG 2000 encoder.Very nice - most previous JP2K encoders have been royalty-based, although Irfanview has one I just noticed. Adobe removed JPEG 2000 support from Photoshop, if I recall correctly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JasPer
 
Last edited:
When compiling dcraw yesterday I noticed that it optionally called for the Jasper library. This might be the same as...
Same as the JasPer JPEG 2000 encoder?

You never know nowadays, we have so many things with the same name. Actually I don't think it is the same. Here is a line from the dcraw.c source code:

#include /* Decode Red camera movies */

I installed the jasper(1) program on Linux, but still could not compile dcraw except with -NODEPS.
 
When compiling dcraw yesterday I noticed that it optionally called for the Jasper library. This might be the same as...
Same as the JasPer JPEG 2000 encoder?

You never know nowadays, we have so many things with the same name. Actually I don't think it is the same. Here is a line from the dcraw.c source code:

#include /* Decode Red camera movies */

I installed the jasper(1) program on Linux, but still could not compile dcraw except with -NODEPS.
Complies on my Mac using

gcc -o dcraw -O4 dcraw.c -lm -ljasper -ljpeg -llcms2 -I /opt/local/include -L/opt/local/lib -lpcre
 
Compiles on my Mac using

gcc -o dcraw -O4 dcraw.c -lm -ljasper -ljpeg -llcms2 -I /opt/local/include -L/opt/local/lib -lpcre
Thanks, it compiles on Linux after installing libjasper-dev.

I guess the RED camera outputs JPEG 2000, or something.

It does seem to be the same JasPer.
 
Last edited:
Compiles on my Mac using

gcc -o dcraw -O4 dcraw.c -lm -ljasper -ljpeg -llcms2 -I /opt/local/include -L/opt/local/lib -lpcre
Thanks, it compiles on Linux after installing libjasper-dev.
Excellent.
I guess the RED camera outputs JPEG 2000, or something.
RED are using an extension of JPEG2000, and jasper is used exactly for the purpose of decoding Red camera footage. Normally you can see jas_stream as a part of it.

--

 
I haven't seen this new program discussed here. Maybe folks were simply not aware of it or maybe they didn't like it. Anyway, I think it's interesting although I'm not sure where it fits in my own personal workflow... I have to say the RAW conversions are blazingly fast:

http://www.fastrawviewer.com/
One possible workflow would be to put your Raw files in a folder for each day (or week) of shooting. Back 'em up twice to different media. Then run FRV to decide which ones to convert with added effort in postprocessing. You could use a slow converter with best quality, or ACR, and possibly a superior NR tool as well.

Because let's face it, not every photo taken is worth preserving and/or deserves editing.
 
0.9.4 is out this morning, it is a major update, includes colour management, extended exif display, and some other new and improved features. Download and changelog http://www.fastrawviewer.com/download
Impressive list of enhancements. Thanks!

FYI: I would love to see a fast click-to-zoom feature rather like FastPictureViewer. That's something I use all of the time. It's a really good way to quickly access whether certain features are sharp and in focus, to check shadows for noise, and more.
 
One possible workflow would be to put your Raw files in a folder for each day (or week) of shooting. Back 'em up twice to different media. Then run FRV to decide which ones to convert with added effort in postprocessing. You could use a slow converter with best quality, or ACR, and possibly a superior NR tool as well.
That's pretty much what I do currently using FastPictureViewer. I think FastRawViewer could do a very good job too. And although I prefer the clean line of FPV as an image viewer, FRV has some nice features for the initial evaluation of RAW files.

I shall be interested to see what FRV offers over time for tagging the images; caption, keywords, location etc.

I guess Axel and Iliah will be battling it out for a while :-) Still, I think we'll all be winners and I shall most likely use both programs on a regular basis.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top